%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : LCL176-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:11:58 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 10.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 14
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 39 ( 20 unt; 0 nHn; 18 RR)
% Number of literals : 65 ( 2 equ; 30 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 70 ( 9 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_2,axiom,
( ~ theorem(X2)
| ~ theorem(implies(X2,X1))
| theorem(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',rule_2) ).
cnf(implies_definition,axiom,
implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',implies_definition) ).
cnf(rule_1,axiom,
( ~ axiom(X1)
| theorem(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',rule_1) ).
cnf(axiom_1_5,axiom,
axiom(implies(or(X1,or(X2,X3)),or(X2,or(X1,X3)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_5) ).
cnf(axiom_1_3,axiom,
axiom(implies(X1,or(X2,X1))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_3) ).
cnf(axiom_1_4,axiom,
axiom(implies(or(X1,X2),or(X2,X1))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_4) ).
cnf(axiom_1_2,axiom,
axiom(implies(or(X1,X1),X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_2) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ theorem(implies(p,p)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ theorem(X2)
| ~ theorem(implies(X2,X1))
| theorem(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ theorem(X2)
| ~ theorem(implies(X2,X1))
| theorem(X1) ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2),
implies_definition ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ axiom(X1)
| theorem(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ theorem(or(not(X2),X1))
| ~ theorem(X2)
| theorem(X1) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ axiom(X1)
| theorem(X1) ),
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
axiom(implies(or(X1,or(X2,X3)),or(X2,or(X1,X3)))),
axiom_1_5 ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
axiom(implies(X1,or(X2,X1))),
axiom_1_3 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ axiom(or(not(X2),X1))
| ~ theorem(X2)
| theorem(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
axiom(or(not(or(X1,or(X2,X3))),or(X2,or(X1,X3)))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
axiom(or(not(X1),or(X2,X1))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ theorem(or(X2,or(X1,X3)))
| theorem(or(X1,or(X2,X3))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ theorem(X2)
| theorem(or(X1,X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ theorem(or(X1,X3))
| theorem(or(X1,or(X2,X3))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ theorem(X3)
| ~ theorem(or(not(X3),X2))
| theorem(or(X1,X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,axiom,
axiom(implies(or(X1,X2),or(X2,X1))),
axiom_1_4 ).
cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
axiom(implies(or(X1,X1),X1)),
axiom_1_2 ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( ~ axiom(or(not(X3),X2))
| ~ theorem(X3)
| theorem(or(X1,X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
axiom(or(not(or(X1,X2)),or(X2,X1))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
axiom(or(not(or(X1,X1)),X1)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( ~ theorem(or(X3,X2))
| theorem(or(X1,or(X2,X3))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( ~ theorem(or(X1,X1))
| theorem(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( ~ theorem(or(X3,X1))
| theorem(or(X1,or(X2,X3))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
~ theorem(implies(p,p)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( ~ theorem(or(X2,or(X1,X2)))
| theorem(or(X1,X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( ~ axiom(or(X2,or(X1,X3)))
| theorem(or(X1,or(X2,X3))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
~ theorem(implies(p,p)),
c_0_31 ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
( ~ axiom(or(X1,or(X2,X2)))
| theorem(or(X1,X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
~ theorem(or(not(p),p)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
theorem(or(not(X1),X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : LCL176-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/10.38 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.09/10.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/10.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/10.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/10.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/10.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/10.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/10.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 00:04:07 UTC 2026
% 0.09/10.39 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/10.39 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/10.43 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/10.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/10.46 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/10.46 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/10.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/10.46 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/10.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/10.46 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/10.46 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/10.46 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 987121 completed with status 0
% 0.14/10.46 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.14/10.46 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/10.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/10.46 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/10.46 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/10.46 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/10.46 % Search class: FHUNM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/10.46 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/10.46 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/10.46 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/10.46 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/10.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/10.46 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/10.46 % SubtermCWHack with pid 987126 completed with status 0
% 0.14/10.46 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.14/10.46 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/10.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/10.46 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/10.46 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/10.46 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/10.46 % Search class: FHUNM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/10.46 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/10.46 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/10.46 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.14/10.46
% 0.14/10.46 % Proof found!
% 0.14/10.46 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.14/10.46 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/10.46 % Parsed axioms : 9
% 0.14/10.46 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.14/10.46 % Initial clauses : 9
% 0.14/10.46 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.14/10.46 % Initial clauses in saturation : 8
% 0.14/10.46 % Processed clauses : 149
% 0.14/10.46 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.14/10.46 % ...subsumed : 88
% 0.14/10.46 % ...remaining for further processing : 61
% 0.14/10.46 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.14/10.46 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.14/10.46 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.14/10.46 % Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.14/10.46 % Generated clauses : 258
% 0.14/10.46 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 247
% 0.14/10.46 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.14/10.46 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.14/10.46 % Paramodulations : 258
% 0.14/10.46 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.14/10.46 % NegExts : 0
% 0.14/10.46 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.14/10.46 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.14/10.46 % Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.14/10.46 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.14/10.46 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.14/10.46 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.14/10.46 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/10.46 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.14/10.46 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/10.46 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.14/10.46 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.14/10.46 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/10.46 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/10.46 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.14/10.46 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/10.46 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/10.46 % Current number of processed clauses : 60
% 0.14/10.46 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 6
% 0.14/10.46 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/10.46 % Negative unit clauses : 6
% 0.14/10.46 % Non-unit-clauses : 48
% 0.14/10.46 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 106
% 0.14/10.46 % ...number of literals in the above : 240
% 0.14/10.46 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.14/10.46 % Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.14/10.46 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 857
% 0.14/10.46 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 857
% 0.14/10.46 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 88
% 0.14/10.46 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9
% 0.14/10.46 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.14/10.46 % BW rewrite match attempts : 14
% 0.14/10.46 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.14/10.46 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.14/10.46 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.14/10.46 % Termbank termtop insertions : 3076
% 0.14/10.46 % Search garbage collected termcells : 11
% 0.14/10.46
% 0.14/10.46 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/10.46 % User time : 0.008 s
% 0.14/10.46 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.14/10.46 % Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.14/10.46 % Maximum resident set size: 3640 pages
% 0.14/10.46
% 0.14/10.46 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/10.46 % User time : 0.029 s
% 0.14/10.46 % System time : 0.014 s
% 0.14/10.46 % Total time : 0.043 s
% 0.14/10.46 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.14/10.46 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------