↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : LCL178-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:58:11 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.37s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   37 (  28 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   49 (   2 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   31 (  19   ~;  12   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   76 (   4 sgn  15   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(rule_1,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] :
      ( ~ axiom(VAR_0)
      | theorem(VAR_0) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',rule_1) ).

cnf(c_1,plain,
    ( ~ axiom(A)
    | theorem(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[rule_1]) ).

fof(axiom_1_6,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] : axiom(implies(implies(VAR_0,VAR_1),implies(or(VAR_2,VAR_0),or(VAR_2,VAR_1)))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_1_6) ).

cnf(c_2,plain,
    axiom(implies(implies(A,B),implies(or(C,A),or(C,B)))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[axiom_1_6]) ).

fof(axiom_1_5,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] : axiom(implies(or(VAR_0,or(VAR_1,VAR_2)),or(VAR_1,or(VAR_0,VAR_2)))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_1_5) ).

cnf(c_3,plain,
    axiom(implies(or(A,or(B,C)),or(B,or(A,C)))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[axiom_1_5]) ).

fof(axiom_1_4,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : axiom(implies(or(VAR_0,VAR_1),or(VAR_1,VAR_0))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_1_4) ).

cnf(c_4,plain,
    axiom(implies(or(A,B),or(B,A))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[axiom_1_4]) ).

fof(axiom_1_3,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : axiom(implies(VAR_0,or(VAR_1,VAR_0))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_1_3) ).

cnf(c_5,plain,
    axiom(implies(A,or(B,A))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[axiom_1_3]) ).

cnf(c_8,plain,
    theorem(implies(A,or(B,A))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_5]) ).

cnf(c_9,plain,
    theorem(implies(or(A,B),or(B,A))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_4]) ).

cnf(c_10,plain,
    theorem(implies(or(A,or(B,C)),or(B,or(A,C)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_3]) ).

cnf(c_11,plain,
    theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(or(C,A),or(C,B)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_2]) ).

fof(prove_this,axiom,
    ~ theorem(implies(p,not(not(p)))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

cnf(c_12,plain,
    ~ theorem(implies(p,not(not(p)))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).

fof(rule_2,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
      ( ~ theorem(VAR_1)
      | ~ theorem(implies(VAR_1,VAR_0))
      | theorem(VAR_0) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',rule_2) ).

cnf(c_13,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(B)
    | ~ theorem(implies(B,A))
    | theorem(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[rule_2]) ).

fof(implies_definition,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : implies(VAR_0,VAR_1) = or(not(VAR_0),VAR_1),
    file('theBenchmark.p',implies_definition) ).

cnf(c_14,plain,
    implies(A,B) = or(not(A),B),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[implies_definition]) ).

cnf(c_15,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(B)
    | ~ theorem(or(not(B),A))
    | theorem(A) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_13]) ).

cnf(c_16,plain,
    ~ theorem(or(not(p),not(not(p)))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_12]) ).

cnf(c_70,plain,
    theorem(implies(or(not(A),B),implies(or(C,A),or(C,B)))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_11]) ).

cnf(c_71,plain,
    theorem(implies(or(not(A),B),or(not(or(C,A)),or(C,B)))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_70]) ).

cnf(c_17,plain,
    theorem(or(not(or(not(A),B)),or(not(or(C,A)),or(C,B)))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_71]) ).

cnf(c_18,plain,
    theorem(or(not(or(A,or(B,C))),or(B,or(A,C)))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_10]) ).

cnf(c_19,plain,
    theorem(or(not(or(A,B)),or(B,A))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_9]) ).

cnf(c_20,plain,
    theorem(or(not(A),or(B,A))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_8]) ).

cnf(c_72,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(or(not(B),C))
    | theorem(or(not(or(A,B)),or(A,C))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_15,c_17]) ).

cnf(c_22,plain,
    theorem(or(not(or(A,or(not(B),C))),or(A,or(not(or(D,B)),or(D,C))))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_72,c_17]) ).

cnf(c_73,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(A)
    | ~ theorem(or(not(A),or(not(p),not(not(p))))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_15,c_16]) ).

cnf(c_34,plain,
    ~ theorem(or(not(not(p)),not(p))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_73,c_19]) ).

cnf(c_74,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(or(B,or(A,C)))
    | theorem(or(A,or(B,C))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_15,c_18]) ).

cnf(c_37,plain,
    theorem(or(A,or(not(B),B))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_74,c_20]) ).

cnf(c_75,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(A)
    | ~ theorem(or(not(A),or(not(not(p)),not(p)))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_15,c_34]) ).

cnf(c_68,plain,
    ~ theorem(or(not(or(not(or(A,or(not(B),C))),or(A,or(not(or(D,B)),or(D,C))))),or(not(not(p)),not(p)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_75,c_22]) ).

cnf(c_69,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_68,c_37]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL178-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 22:03:40 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.35  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.09/0.35  % Process 161480 was started by sandbox on n001,
% 0.09/0.35  % Fri Sep 25 22:03:40 2026
% 0.09/0.35  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.09/0.36  
% 0.09/0.36  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.13/0.37  % Length of proof is 23.
% 0.13/0.37  % Level of proof is 5.
% 0.13/0.37  % Maximum clause weight is 27.000.
% 0.13/0.37  % Given clauses 11.
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------