↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : LCL182-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:11:59 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.17s 0.84s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   42 (  24 unt;   0 nHn;  21 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   67 (   2 equ;  29 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   78 (   3 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_2,axiom,
    ( ~ theorem(X2)
    | ~ theorem(implies(X2,X1))
    | theorem(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',rule_2) ).

cnf(implies_definition,axiom,
    implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',implies_definition) ).

cnf(rule_1,axiom,
    ( ~ axiom(X1)
    | theorem(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',rule_1) ).

cnf(axiom_1_6,axiom,
    axiom(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(or(X3,X1),or(X3,X2)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_6) ).

cnf(axiom_1_5,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(X1,or(X2,X3)),or(X2,or(X1,X3)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_5) ).

cnf(axiom_1_2,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(X1,X1),X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_2) ).

cnf(axiom_1_4,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(X1,X2),or(X2,X1))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_4) ).

cnf(axiom_1_3,axiom,
    axiom(implies(X1,or(X2,X1))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_3) ).

cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(implies(implies(p,q),implies(not(q),not(p)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(X2)
    | ~ theorem(implies(X2,X1))
    | theorem(X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(X2)
    | ~ theorem(implies(X2,X1))
    | theorem(X1) ),
    c_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2),
    implies_definition ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ axiom(X1)
    | theorem(X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(or(not(X2),X1))
    | ~ theorem(X2)
    | theorem(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ axiom(X1)
    | theorem(X1) ),
    c_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    axiom(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(or(X3,X1),or(X3,X2)))),
    axiom_1_6 ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(X1,or(X2,X3)),or(X2,or(X1,X3)))),
    axiom_1_5 ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ axiom(or(not(X2),X1))
    | ~ theorem(X2)
    | theorem(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    axiom(or(not(or(not(X1),X2)),or(not(or(X3,X1)),or(X3,X2)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_11]),c_0_11]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(X1,X1),X1)),
    axiom_1_2 ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    axiom(or(not(or(X1,or(X2,X3))),or(X2,or(X1,X3)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(or(not(X2),X3))
    | theorem(or(not(or(X1,X2)),or(X1,X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    axiom(or(not(or(X1,X1)),X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(or(X2,or(X1,X3)))
    | theorem(or(X1,or(X2,X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(or(X1,X3))
    | ~ theorem(or(not(X3),X2))
    | theorem(or(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(X1,X2),or(X2,X1))),
    axiom_1_4 ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(or(X1,X1))
    | theorem(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ axiom(or(X2,or(X1,X3)))
    | theorem(or(X1,or(X2,X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,axiom,
    axiom(implies(X1,or(X2,X1))),
    axiom_1_3 ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(implies(implies(p,q),implies(not(q),not(p)))),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ axiom(or(not(X3),X2))
    | ~ theorem(or(X1,X3))
    | theorem(or(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    axiom(or(not(or(X1,X2)),or(X2,X1))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ axiom(or(X1,or(or(X1,X2),X2)))
    | theorem(or(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    axiom(or(not(X1),or(X2,X1))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(implies(implies(p,q),implies(not(q),not(p)))),
    c_0_29 ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(or(X1,or(X3,X2)))
    | theorem(or(X1,or(X2,X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(or(X2,X1))
    | theorem(or(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    theorem(or(not(X1),X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(or(not(or(not(p),q)),or(not(not(q)),not(p)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_11]),c_0_11]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(or(not(X2),X3))
    | theorem(or(not(or(X1,X2)),or(X3,X1))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    theorem(or(X1,not(X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]),c_0_40])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : LCL182-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.60  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.60  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.60  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.60  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.60  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.61  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.61  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.61  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 00:09:20 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.61  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.61  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.64  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.64  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.84  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.17/0.84  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.84  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.84  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.84  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.84  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.84  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.84  % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 2735829 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.84  % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.17/0.84  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.84  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.84  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.84  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.17/0.84  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.17/0.84  % Search class: FHUNM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.84  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.17/0.84  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.84  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.84  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.84  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.84  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.84  % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with pid 2735836 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.84  % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN
% 0.17/0.84  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.84  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.84  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.84  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.17/0.84  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.17/0.84  % Search class: FHUNM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.84  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.17/0.84  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.84  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.84  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.84  % Preprocessing time       : 0.005 s
% 0.17/0.84  
% 0.17/0.84  % Proof found!
% 0.17/0.84  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.17/0.84  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.84  % Parsed axioms                        : 9
% 0.17/0.84  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.17/0.84  % Initial clauses                      : 9
% 0.17/0.84  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 0.17/0.84  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 8
% 0.17/0.84  % Processed clauses                    : 1103
% 0.17/0.84  % ...of these trivial                  : 6
% 0.17/0.84  % ...subsumed                          : 686
% 0.17/0.84  % ...remaining for further processing  : 411
% 0.17/0.84  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.17/0.84  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.17/0.84  % Backward-subsumed                    : 17
% 0.17/0.84  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.17/0.84  % Generated clauses                    : 7158
% 0.17/0.84  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 6974
% 0.17/0.84  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.17/0.84  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.17/0.84  % Paramodulations                      : 7158
% 0.17/0.84  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.17/0.84  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.17/0.84  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.17/0.84  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.17/0.84  % Total rewrite steps                  : 110
% 0.17/0.84  % ...of those cached                   : 80
% 0.17/0.84  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.17/0.84  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.17/0.84  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.84  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.17/0.84  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.84  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.17/0.84  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.17/0.84  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.17/0.84  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.17/0.84  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.17/0.84  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.17/0.84  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.17/0.84  % Current number of processed clauses  : 394
% 0.17/0.84  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 19
% 0.17/0.84  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.84  %    Negative unit clauses             : 33
% 0.17/0.84  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 342
% 0.17/0.84  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5798
% 0.17/0.84  % ...number of literals in the above   : 18140
% 0.17/0.84  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.17/0.84  % Current number of archived clauses   : 18
% 0.17/0.84  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 23685
% 0.17/0.84  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 21285
% 0.17/0.84  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 672
% 0.17/0.84  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 498
% 0.17/0.84  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.17/0.84  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 346
% 0.17/0.84  % BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.17/0.84  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.17/0.84  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.17/0.84  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 112478
% 0.17/0.84  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 11
% 0.17/0.84  
% 0.17/0.84  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.84  % User time                : 0.167 s
% 0.17/0.84  % System time              : 0.012 s
% 0.17/0.84  % Total time               : 0.178 s
% 0.17/0.84  % Maximum resident set size: 3640 pages
% 0.17/0.84  
% 0.17/0.84  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.84  % User time                : 0.823 s
% 0.17/0.84  % System time              : 0.073 s
% 0.17/0.84  % Total time               : 0.896 s
% 0.17/0.84  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.17/0.84  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------