%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : LCL188-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:12:01 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.26s 0.53s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 33 ( 18 unt; 0 nHn; 17 RR)
% Number of literals : 54 ( 2 equ; 26 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 61 ( 5 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_2,axiom,
( ~ theorem(X2)
| ~ theorem(implies(X2,X1))
| theorem(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',rule_2) ).
cnf(implies_definition,axiom,
implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',implies_definition) ).
cnf(rule_1,axiom,
( ~ axiom(X1)
| theorem(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',rule_1) ).
cnf(axiom_1_5,axiom,
axiom(implies(or(X1,or(X2,X3)),or(X2,or(X1,X3)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_5) ).
cnf(axiom_1_6,axiom,
axiom(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(or(X3,X1),or(X3,X2)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_6) ).
cnf(axiom_1_3,axiom,
axiom(implies(X1,or(X2,X1))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_3) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ theorem(or(p,implies(or(p,q),q))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ theorem(X2)
| ~ theorem(implies(X2,X1))
| theorem(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ theorem(X2)
| ~ theorem(implies(X2,X1))
| theorem(X1) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2),
implies_definition ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ axiom(X1)
| theorem(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ theorem(or(not(X2),X1))
| ~ theorem(X2)
| theorem(X1) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ axiom(X1)
| theorem(X1) ),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
axiom(implies(or(X1,or(X2,X3)),or(X2,or(X1,X3)))),
axiom_1_5 ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ axiom(or(not(X2),X1))
| ~ theorem(X2)
| theorem(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
axiom(or(not(or(X1,or(X2,X3))),or(X2,or(X1,X3)))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ theorem(or(X2,or(X1,X3)))
| theorem(or(X1,or(X2,X3))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
axiom(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(or(X3,X1),or(X3,X2)))),
axiom_1_6 ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ axiom(or(X2,or(X1,X3)))
| theorem(or(X1,or(X2,X3))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
axiom(implies(X1,or(X2,X1))),
axiom_1_3 ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ theorem(or(p,implies(or(p,q),q))),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
axiom(or(not(or(not(X1),X2)),or(not(or(X3,X1)),or(X3,X2)))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_9]),c_0_9]),c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ axiom(or(X1,or(not(X3),X2)))
| ~ theorem(X3)
| theorem(or(X1,X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
axiom(or(not(X1),or(X2,X1))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
~ theorem(or(p,implies(or(p,q),q))),
c_0_20 ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( ~ theorem(or(not(X2),X3))
| theorem(or(not(or(X1,X2)),or(X1,X3))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ theorem(X2)
| theorem(or(not(X1),X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
~ theorem(or(p,or(not(or(p,q)),q))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( ~ theorem(or(not(X2),X3))
| theorem(or(X1,or(not(or(X1,X2)),X3))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( ~ axiom(X2)
| theorem(or(not(X1),X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
~ theorem(or(not(q),q)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
theorem(or(not(X1),X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : LCL188-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.42 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.42 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.42 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.42 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.42 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.42 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.42 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.18/0.42 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 00:11:58 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.43 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.43 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.26/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.26/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/0.53 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.26/0.53 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.53 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.53 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.53 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.53 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.53 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.53 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 554132 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.26/0.53 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.53 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.53 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.53 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.26/0.53 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.26/0.53 % Search class: FHUNM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.53 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.26/0.53 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.53 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.53 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.53 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.53 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.53 % SubtermCWHack with pid 554137 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.26/0.53 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.53 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.53 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.53 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.26/0.53 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.26/0.53 % Search class: FHUNM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.53 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.26/0.53 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.53 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.26/0.53
% 0.26/0.53 % Proof found!
% 0.26/0.53 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.26/0.53 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/0.53 % Parsed axioms : 9
% 0.26/0.53 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Initial clauses : 9
% 0.26/0.53 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.26/0.53 % Initial clauses in saturation : 8
% 0.26/0.53 % Processed clauses : 134
% 0.26/0.53 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % ...subsumed : 63
% 0.26/0.53 % ...remaining for further processing : 71
% 0.26/0.53 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.26/0.53 % Generated clauses : 208
% 0.26/0.53 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 199
% 0.26/0.53 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Paramodulations : 208
% 0.26/0.53 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % NegExts : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Total rewrite steps : 3
% 0.26/0.53 % ...of those cached : 1
% 0.26/0.53 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.53 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.53 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.53 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.53 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.53 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.53 % Current number of processed clauses : 68
% 0.26/0.53 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 6
% 0.26/0.53 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Negative unit clauses : 22
% 0.26/0.53 % Non-unit-clauses : 40
% 0.26/0.53 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 73
% 0.26/0.53 % ...number of literals in the above : 167
% 0.26/0.53 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.26/0.53 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 497
% 0.26/0.53 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 497
% 0.26/0.53 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 54
% 0.26/0.53 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 62
% 0.26/0.53 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % BW rewrite match attempts : 15
% 0.26/0.53 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.26/0.53 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Termbank termtop insertions : 2389
% 0.26/0.53 % Search garbage collected termcells : 11
% 0.26/0.53
% 0.26/0.53 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.53 % User time : 0.009 s
% 0.26/0.53 % System time : 0.006 s
% 0.26/0.53 % Total time : 0.016 s
% 0.26/0.53 % Maximum resident set size: 3640 pages
% 0.26/0.53
% 0.26/0.53 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.53 % User time : 0.046 s
% 0.26/0.53 % System time : 0.023 s
% 0.26/0.53 % Total time : 0.069 s
% 0.26/0.53 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.26/0.53 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------