%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : LCL190-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:18:43 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 11 RR)
% Number of literals : 26 ( 0 equ; 14 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_2,axiom,
( ~ theorem(X2)
| ~ axiom(or(not(X2),X1))
| theorem(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL003-0.ax',rule_2) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ theorem(or(not(or(p,or(q,r))),or(p,or(r,q)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(axiom_1_6,axiom,
axiom(or(not(or(not(X1),X2)),or(not(or(X3,X1)),or(X3,X2)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL003-0.ax',axiom_1_6) ).
cnf(rule_1,axiom,
( ~ axiom(X1)
| theorem(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL003-0.ax',rule_1) ).
cnf(axiom_1_4,axiom,
axiom(or(not(or(X1,X2)),or(X2,X1))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL003-0.ax',axiom_1_4) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ theorem(X2)
| ~ axiom(or(not(X2),X1))
| theorem(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ theorem(or(not(or(p,or(q,r))),or(p,or(r,q)))),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ theorem(X2)
| ~ axiom(or(not(X2),X1))
| theorem(X1) ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
axiom(or(not(or(not(X1),X2)),or(not(or(X3,X1)),or(X3,X2)))),
axiom_1_6 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ theorem(or(not(or(p,or(q,r))),or(p,or(r,q)))),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ theorem(or(not(X2),X3))
| theorem(or(not(or(X1,X2)),or(X1,X3))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ axiom(X1)
| theorem(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ theorem(or(not(or(q,r)),or(r,q))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ axiom(X1)
| theorem(X1) ),
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
axiom(or(not(or(X1,X2)),or(X2,X1))),
axiom_1_4 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : LCL190-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.37 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 00:13:35 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.43 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 138888 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.15/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/0.43 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.43 % Search class: FHUNM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 138893 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.15/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/0.43 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.43 % Search class: FHUNM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.43 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 % Proof found!
% 0.15/0.43 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.43 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.43 % Parsed axioms : 9
% 0.15/0.43 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Initial clauses : 9
% 0.15/0.43 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Initial clauses in saturation : 9
% 0.15/0.43 % Processed clauses : 63
% 0.15/0.43 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % ...subsumed : 11
% 0.15/0.43 % ...remaining for further processing : 52
% 0.15/0.43 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Generated clauses : 74
% 0.15/0.43 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 67
% 0.15/0.43 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Paramodulations : 74
% 0.15/0.43 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.15/0.43 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 % Current number of processed clauses : 43
% 0.15/0.43 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 5
% 0.15/0.43 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Negative unit clauses : 18
% 0.15/0.43 % Non-unit-clauses : 20
% 0.15/0.43 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 22
% 0.15/0.43 % ...number of literals in the above : 49
% 0.15/0.43 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Current number of archived clauses : 9
% 0.15/0.43 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 120
% 0.15/0.43 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 120
% 0.15/0.43 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 9
% 0.15/0.43 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 30
% 0.15/0.43 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % BW rewrite match attempts : 20
% 0.15/0.43 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.43 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1174
% 0.15/0.43 % Search garbage collected termcells : 17
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.43 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.43 % Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.15/0.43 % Maximum resident set size: 3644 pages
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43 % User time : 0.019 s
% 0.15/0.43 % System time : 0.018 s
% 0.15/0.43 % Total time : 0.037 s
% 0.15/0.43 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.15/0.43 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------