↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : LCL192-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:12:02 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 12.11s 2.22s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 12.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   51 (  26 unt;   0 nHn;  25 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   86 (   2 equ;  40 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  106 (   8 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_2,axiom,
    ( ~ theorem(X2)
    | ~ theorem(implies(X2,X1))
    | theorem(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',rule_2) ).

cnf(implies_definition,axiom,
    implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',implies_definition) ).

cnf(rule_1,axiom,
    ( ~ axiom(X1)
    | theorem(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',rule_1) ).

cnf(axiom_1_5,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(X1,or(X2,X3)),or(X2,or(X1,X3)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_5) ).

cnf(axiom_1_3,axiom,
    axiom(implies(X1,or(X2,X1))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_3) ).

cnf(axiom_1_2,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(X1,X1),X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_2) ).

cnf(axiom_1_6,axiom,
    axiom(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(or(X3,X1),or(X3,X2)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_6) ).

cnf(axiom_1_4,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(X1,X2),or(X2,X1))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_4) ).

cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(implies(or(or(p,q),r),or(p,or(q,r)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(X2)
    | ~ theorem(implies(X2,X1))
    | theorem(X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(X2)
    | ~ theorem(implies(X2,X1))
    | theorem(X1) ),
    c_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2),
    implies_definition ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ axiom(X1)
    | theorem(X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(or(not(X2),X1))
    | ~ theorem(X2)
    | theorem(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ axiom(X1)
    | theorem(X1) ),
    c_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(X1,or(X2,X3)),or(X2,or(X1,X3)))),
    axiom_1_5 ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    axiom(implies(X1,or(X2,X1))),
    axiom_1_3 ).

cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(X1,X1),X1)),
    axiom_1_2 ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ axiom(or(not(X2),X1))
    | ~ theorem(X2)
    | theorem(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    axiom(or(not(or(X1,or(X2,X3))),or(X2,or(X1,X3)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    axiom(or(not(X1),or(X2,X1))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
    axiom(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(or(X3,X1),or(X3,X2)))),
    axiom_1_6 ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    axiom(or(not(or(X1,X1)),X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(or(X2,or(X1,X3)))
    | theorem(or(X1,or(X2,X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(X2)
    | theorem(or(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    axiom(or(not(or(not(X1),X2)),or(not(or(X3,X1)),or(X3,X2)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_11]),c_0_11]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(X1,X2),or(X2,X1))),
    axiom_1_4 ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(or(X1,X1))
    | theorem(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(or(X1,X3))
    | theorem(or(X1,or(X2,X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(or(not(X2),X3))
    | theorem(or(not(or(X1,X2)),or(X1,X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    axiom(or(not(or(X1,X2)),or(X2,X1))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(or(or(X1,X2),X2))
    | theorem(or(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ axiom(or(X2,or(X1,X3)))
    | theorem(or(X1,or(X2,X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(or(X1,X3))
    | ~ theorem(or(not(X3),X2))
    | theorem(or(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(or(X2,X1))
    | theorem(or(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(or(not(X2),X3))
    | theorem(or(X1,or(not(or(X1,X2)),X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( ~ axiom(or(X2,or(or(X1,or(X2,X3)),X3)))
    | theorem(or(X1,or(X2,X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(implies(or(or(p,q),r),or(p,or(q,r)))),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(or(not(X4),X3))
    | ~ theorem(or(X1,or(X2,X4)))
    | theorem(or(X1,or(X2,X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(or(not(X2),X3))
    | theorem(or(or(not(or(X1,X2)),X3),X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    ( ~ axiom(or(not(X3),X2))
    | ~ theorem(or(X1,X3))
    | theorem(or(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    theorem(or(X1,or(not(X2),X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(implies(or(or(p,q),r),or(p,or(q,r)))),
    c_0_37 ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(or(not(X3),X4))
    | ~ theorem(or(not(X2),X5))
    | theorem(or(or(not(or(or(X1,X2),X3)),X4),or(X1,X5))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(or(X1,or(X3,X2)))
    | theorem(or(X1,or(X2,X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    theorem(or(not(X1),or(X2,X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(or(not(or(or(p,q),r)),or(p,or(q,r)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(or(not(X2),X4))
    | ~ theorem(or(not(X3),or(X1,X4)))
    | theorem(or(not(or(or(X1,X2),X3)),or(X1,X4))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    theorem(or(not(X1),or(X1,X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(or(not(r),or(p,or(q,r)))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47]),c_0_48])]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_28]),c_0_45])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : LCL192-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 00:12:14 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.35  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.39  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.39  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 12.11/2.22  % Version: 3.5.1
% 12.11/2.22  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 12.11/2.22  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 12.11/2.22  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 12.11/2.22  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 12.11/2.22  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 12.11/2.22  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 12.11/2.22  % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 554880 completed with status 0
% 12.11/2.22  % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 12.11/2.22  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 12.11/2.22  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 12.11/2.22  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 12.11/2.22  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 12.11/2.22  % No SInE strategy applied
% 12.11/2.22  % Search class: FHUNM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 12.11/2.22  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 12.11/2.22  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 12.11/2.22  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 12.11/2.22  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 12.11/2.22  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 12.11/2.22  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 12.11/2.22  % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 554888 completed with status 0
% 12.11/2.22  % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 12.11/2.22  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 12.11/2.22  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 12.11/2.22  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 12.11/2.22  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 12.11/2.22  % No SInE strategy applied
% 12.11/2.22  % Search class: FHUNM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 12.11/2.22  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 12.11/2.22  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 12.11/2.22  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 12.11/2.22  % Preprocessing time       : 0.005 s
% 12.11/2.22  
% 12.11/2.22  % Proof found!
% 12.11/2.22  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 12.11/2.22  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 12.11/2.22  % Parsed axioms                        : 9
% 12.11/2.22  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 12.11/2.22  % Initial clauses                      : 9
% 12.11/2.22  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 12.11/2.22  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 8
% 12.11/2.22  % Processed clauses                    : 5033
% 12.11/2.22  % ...of these trivial                  : 22
% 12.11/2.22  % ...subsumed                          : 3503
% 12.11/2.22  % ...remaining for further processing  : 1508
% 12.11/2.22  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 12.11/2.22  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 12.11/2.22  % Backward-subsumed                    : 89
% 12.11/2.22  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 12.11/2.22  % Generated clauses                    : 95640
% 12.11/2.22  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 94411
% 12.11/2.22  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 12.11/2.22  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 12.11/2.22  % Paramodulations                      : 95640
% 12.11/2.22  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 12.11/2.22  % NegExts                              : 0
% 12.11/2.22  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 12.11/2.22  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 12.11/2.22  % Total rewrite steps                  : 969
% 12.11/2.22  % ...of those cached                   : 806
% 12.11/2.22  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 12.11/2.22  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 12.11/2.22  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 12.11/2.22  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 12.11/2.22  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 12.11/2.22  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 12.11/2.22  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 12.11/2.22  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 12.11/2.22  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 12.11/2.22  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 12.11/2.22  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 12.11/2.22  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 12.11/2.22  % Current number of processed clauses  : 1419
% 12.11/2.22  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 51
% 12.11/2.22  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 12.11/2.22  %    Negative unit clauses             : 110
% 12.11/2.22  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1258
% 12.11/2.22  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 89265
% 12.11/2.22  % ...number of literals in the above   : 281107
% 12.11/2.22  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 12.11/2.22  % Current number of archived clauses   : 90
% 12.11/2.22  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 242703
% 12.11/2.22  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 223702
% 12.11/2.22  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 3357
% 12.11/2.22  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4587
% 12.11/2.22  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 12.11/2.22  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 2834
% 12.11/2.22  % BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 12.11/2.22  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 12.11/2.22  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 12.11/2.22  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 1791176
% 12.11/2.22  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 11
% 12.11/2.22  
% 12.11/2.22  % -------------------------------------------------
% 12.11/2.22  % User time                : 1.653 s
% 12.11/2.22  % System time              : 0.083 s
% 12.11/2.22  % Total time               : 1.736 s
% 12.11/2.22  % Maximum resident set size: 3384 pages
% 12.11/2.22  
% 12.11/2.22  % -------------------------------------------------
% 12.11/2.22  % User time                : 8.347 s
% 12.11/2.22  % System time              : 0.362 s
% 12.11/2.22  % Total time               : 8.708 s
% 12.11/2.22  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 12.11/2.22  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------