↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : LCL194-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:58:15 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.03s 0.33s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.03s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (  26 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   47 (   2 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   33 (  21   ~;  12   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   71 (   0 sgn  13   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(rule_1,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] :
      ( ~ axiom(VAR_0)
      | theorem(VAR_0) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',rule_1) ).

cnf(c_1,plain,
    ( ~ axiom(A)
    | theorem(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[rule_1]) ).

fof(axiom_1_6,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] : axiom(implies(implies(VAR_0,VAR_1),implies(or(VAR_2,VAR_0),or(VAR_2,VAR_1)))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_1_6) ).

cnf(c_2,plain,
    axiom(implies(implies(A,B),implies(or(C,A),or(C,B)))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[axiom_1_6]) ).

fof(axiom_1_5,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] : axiom(implies(or(VAR_0,or(VAR_1,VAR_2)),or(VAR_1,or(VAR_0,VAR_2)))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_1_5) ).

cnf(c_3,plain,
    axiom(implies(or(A,or(B,C)),or(B,or(A,C)))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[axiom_1_5]) ).

fof(axiom_1_4,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : axiom(implies(or(VAR_0,VAR_1),or(VAR_1,VAR_0))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_1_4) ).

cnf(c_4,plain,
    axiom(implies(or(A,B),or(B,A))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[axiom_1_4]) ).

cnf(c_9,plain,
    theorem(implies(or(A,B),or(B,A))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_4]) ).

cnf(c_10,plain,
    theorem(implies(or(A,or(B,C)),or(B,or(A,C)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_3]) ).

cnf(c_11,plain,
    theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(or(C,A),or(C,B)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_2]) ).

fof(prove_this,axiom,
    ~ theorem(implies(implies(q,r),implies(or(q,p),or(p,r)))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

cnf(c_12,plain,
    ~ theorem(implies(implies(q,r),implies(or(q,p),or(p,r)))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).

fof(rule_2,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
      ( ~ theorem(VAR_1)
      | ~ theorem(implies(VAR_1,VAR_0))
      | theorem(VAR_0) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',rule_2) ).

cnf(c_13,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(B)
    | ~ theorem(implies(B,A))
    | theorem(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[rule_2]) ).

fof(implies_definition,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : implies(VAR_0,VAR_1) = or(not(VAR_0),VAR_1),
    file('theBenchmark.p',implies_definition) ).

cnf(c_14,plain,
    implies(A,B) = or(not(A),B),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[implies_definition]) ).

cnf(c_15,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(B)
    | ~ theorem(or(not(B),A))
    | theorem(A) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_13]) ).

cnf(c_214,plain,
    ~ theorem(implies(or(not(q),r),implies(or(q,p),or(p,r)))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_12]) ).

cnf(c_215,plain,
    ~ theorem(implies(or(not(q),r),or(not(or(q,p)),or(p,r)))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_214]) ).

cnf(c_16,plain,
    ~ theorem(or(not(or(not(q),r)),or(not(or(q,p)),or(p,r)))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_215]) ).

cnf(c_216,plain,
    theorem(implies(or(not(A),B),implies(or(C,A),or(C,B)))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_11]) ).

cnf(c_217,plain,
    theorem(implies(or(not(A),B),or(not(or(C,A)),or(C,B)))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_216]) ).

cnf(c_17,plain,
    theorem(or(not(or(not(A),B)),or(not(or(C,A)),or(C,B)))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_217]) ).

cnf(c_18,plain,
    theorem(or(not(or(A,or(B,C))),or(B,or(A,C)))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_10]) ).

cnf(c_19,plain,
    theorem(or(not(or(A,B)),or(B,A))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_9]) ).

cnf(c_218,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(A)
    | ~ theorem(or(not(A),or(not(or(not(q),r)),or(not(or(q,p)),or(p,r))))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_15,c_16]) ).

cnf(c_23,plain,
    ~ theorem(or(not(or(not(or(not(A),B)),or(not(or(C,A)),or(C,B)))),or(not(or(not(q),r)),or(not(or(q,p)),or(p,r))))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_218,c_17]) ).

cnf(c_219,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(or(B,or(A,C)))
    | theorem(or(A,or(B,C))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_15,c_18]) ).

cnf(c_26,plain,
    theorem(or(not(or(A,B)),or(not(or(not(B),C)),or(A,C)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_219,c_17]) ).

cnf(c_220,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(A)
    | ~ theorem(or(not(A),or(not(or(not(or(not(B),C)),or(not(or(D,B)),or(D,C)))),or(not(or(not(q),r)),or(not(or(q,p)),or(p,r)))))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_15,c_23]) ).

cnf(c_63,plain,
    ~ theorem(or(not(or(not(or(A,q)),or(A,r))),or(not(or(q,p)),or(p,r)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_220,c_17]) ).

cnf(c_221,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(or(C,A))
    | theorem(or(not(or(not(A),B)),or(C,B))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_15,c_26]) ).

cnf(c_212,plain,
    theorem(or(not(or(not(or(A,B)),C)),or(not(or(B,A)),C))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_221,c_19]) ).

cnf(c_213,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_212,c_63]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : LCL194-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.03/0.29  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.03/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.03/0.29  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.03/0.29  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.03/0.29  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.29  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.03/0.29  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 21:59:05 UTC 2026
% 0.03/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.03/0.30  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.03/0.30  % Process 3154039 was started by sandbox2 on n012,
% 0.03/0.30  % Fri Sep 25 21:59:05 2026
% 0.03/0.30  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.03/0.30  
% 0.03/0.30  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.03/0.33  
% 0.03/0.33  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.03/0.33  
% 0.03/0.33  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.01) seconds.
% 0.03/0.33  % Length of proof is 20.
% 0.03/0.33  % Level of proof is 5.
% 0.03/0.33  % Maximum clause weight is 91.000.
% 0.03/0.33  % Given clauses 23.
% 0.03/0.33  
% 0.03/0.33  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------