%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : LCL195-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:18:45 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 75.47s 11.57s
% Output : CNFRefutation 75.47s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 14
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 32 ( 17 unt; 0 nHn; 17 RR)
% Number of literals : 53 ( 0 equ; 24 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 71 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_2,axiom,
( ~ theorem(X2)
| ~ axiom(or(not(X2),X1))
| theorem(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL003-0.ax',rule_2) ).
cnf(axiom_1_4,axiom,
axiom(or(not(or(X1,X2)),or(X2,X1))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL003-0.ax',axiom_1_4) ).
cnf(rule_1,axiom,
( ~ axiom(X1)
| theorem(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL003-0.ax',rule_1) ).
cnf(axiom_1_6,axiom,
axiom(or(not(or(not(X1),X2)),or(not(or(X3,X1)),or(X3,X2)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL003-0.ax',axiom_1_6) ).
cnf(rule_3,axiom,
( ~ theorem(or(not(X3),X2))
| ~ axiom(or(not(X1),X3))
| theorem(or(not(X1),X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL003-0.ax',rule_3) ).
cnf(axiom_1_5,axiom,
axiom(or(not(or(X1,or(X2,X3))),or(X2,or(X1,X3)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL003-0.ax',axiom_1_5) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ theorem(or(not(or(not(q),r)),or(not(or(q,p)),or(r,p)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ theorem(X2)
| ~ axiom(or(not(X2),X1))
| theorem(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ theorem(X2)
| ~ axiom(or(not(X2),X1))
| theorem(X1) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
axiom(or(not(or(X1,X2)),or(X2,X1))),
axiom_1_4 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ axiom(X1)
| theorem(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ theorem(or(X2,X1))
| theorem(or(X1,X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ axiom(X1)
| theorem(X1) ),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ axiom(or(X2,X1))
| theorem(or(X1,X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
axiom(or(not(or(not(X1),X2)),or(not(or(X3,X1)),or(X3,X2)))),
axiom_1_6 ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
theorem(or(or(X1,X2),not(or(X2,X1)))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ theorem(or(not(X3),X2))
| ~ axiom(or(not(X1),X3))
| theorem(or(not(X1),X2)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ theorem(or(not(X2),X3))
| theorem(or(not(or(X1,X2)),or(X1,X3))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
theorem(or(not(or(X1,X2)),or(X2,X1))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ theorem(or(not(X3),X2))
| ~ axiom(or(not(X1),X3))
| theorem(or(not(X1),X2)) ),
c_0_16 ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
theorem(or(not(or(X1,or(X2,X3))),or(X1,or(X3,X2)))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
axiom(or(not(or(X1,or(X2,X3))),or(X2,or(X1,X3)))),
axiom_1_5 ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ axiom(or(not(X1),or(X2,or(X4,X3))))
| theorem(or(not(X1),or(X2,or(X3,X4)))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ theorem(or(X2,or(X1,X3)))
| theorem(or(X1,or(X2,X3))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
theorem(or(not(or(not(X1),X2)),or(not(or(X3,X1)),or(X2,X3)))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
theorem(or(not(or(X1,X2)),or(not(or(not(X2),X3)),or(X3,X1)))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ axiom(or(not(X1),or(X4,X2)))
| theorem(or(not(X1),or(not(or(not(X2),X3)),or(X3,X4)))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
~ theorem(or(not(or(not(q),r)),or(not(or(q,p)),or(r,p)))),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
theorem(or(not(or(X1,X2)),or(not(or(not(X1),X3)),or(X3,X2)))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
~ theorem(or(not(or(not(q),r)),or(not(or(q,p)),or(r,p)))),
c_0_27 ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
theorem(or(not(or(not(X1),X2)),or(not(or(X1,X3)),or(X2,X3)))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : LCL195-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.21/0.45 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.21/0.45 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.21/0.45 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.21/0.45 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.21/0.45 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.21/0.46 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.21/0.46 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.21/0.46 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 00:05:41 UTC 2026
% 0.21/0.46 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.46 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.23/0.53 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.53 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 75.47/11.57 % Version: 3.5.1
% 75.47/11.57 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 75.47/11.57 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 75.47/11.57 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 75.47/11.57 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 75.47/11.57 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 75.47/11.57 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 75.47/11.57 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 991059 completed with status 0
% 75.47/11.57 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 75.47/11.57 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 75.47/11.57 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 75.47/11.57 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 75.47/11.57 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 75.47/11.57 % No SInE strategy applied
% 75.47/11.57 % Search class: FHUNM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 75.47/11.57 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 75.47/11.57 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 75.47/11.57 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 75.47/11.57 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 75.47/11.57 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 75.47/11.57 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 75.47/11.57 % new_bool_1 with pid 991069 completed with status 0
% 75.47/11.57 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 75.47/11.57 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 75.47/11.57 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 75.47/11.57 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 75.47/11.57 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 75.47/11.57 % No SInE strategy applied
% 75.47/11.57 % Search class: FHUNM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 75.47/11.57 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 75.47/11.57 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 75.47/11.57 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 75.47/11.57 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 75.47/11.57 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 75.47/11.57 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 75.47/11.57 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 75.47/11.57 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 75.47/11.57
% 75.47/11.57 % Proof found!
% 75.47/11.57 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 75.47/11.57 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 75.47/11.57 % Parsed axioms : 9
% 75.47/11.57 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 75.47/11.57 % Initial clauses : 9
% 75.47/11.57 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 75.47/11.57 % Initial clauses in saturation : 9
% 75.47/11.57 % Processed clauses : 12620
% 75.47/11.57 % ...of these trivial : 545
% 75.47/11.57 % ...subsumed : 380
% 75.47/11.57 % ...remaining for further processing : 11695
% 75.47/11.57 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 75.47/11.57 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 75.47/11.57 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 75.47/11.57 % Backward-rewritten : 3
% 75.47/11.57 % Generated clauses : 50037
% 75.47/11.57 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 34982
% 75.47/11.57 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 75.47/11.57 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 75.47/11.57 % Paramodulations : 50037
% 75.47/11.57 % Factorizations : 0
% 75.47/11.57 % NegExts : 0
% 75.47/11.57 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 75.47/11.57 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 75.47/11.57 % Total rewrite steps : 15596
% 75.47/11.57 % ...of those cached : 6674
% 75.47/11.57 % Propositional unsat checks : 2
% 75.47/11.57 % Propositional check models : 2
% 75.47/11.57 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 75.47/11.57 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 75.47/11.57 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 75.47/11.57 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 75.47/11.57 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 75.47/11.57 % Propositional encoding time : 0.172
% 75.47/11.57 % Propositional solver time : 0.027
% 75.47/11.57 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 75.47/11.57 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 75.47/11.57 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 75.47/11.57 % Current number of processed clauses : 11683
% 75.47/11.57 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 8787
% 75.47/11.57 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 75.47/11.57 % Negative unit clauses : 13
% 75.47/11.57 % Non-unit-clauses : 2883
% 75.47/11.57 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 22380
% 75.47/11.57 % ...number of literals in the above : 22781
% 75.47/11.57 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 75.47/11.57 % Current number of archived clauses : 12
% 75.47/11.57 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 848636
% 75.47/11.57 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 848636
% 75.47/11.57 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 374
% 75.47/11.57 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1921700
% 75.47/11.57 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 75.47/11.57 % BW rewrite match attempts : 16129343
% 75.47/11.57 % BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 75.47/11.57 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 75.47/11.57 % Condensation successes : 0
% 75.47/11.57 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1331860
% 75.47/11.57 % Search garbage collected termcells : 17
% 75.47/11.57
% 75.47/11.57 % -------------------------------------------------
% 75.47/11.57 % User time : 10.587 s
% 75.47/11.57 % System time : 0.174 s
% 75.47/11.57 % Total time : 10.762 s
% 75.47/11.57 % Maximum resident set size: 3644 pages
% 75.47/11.57
% 75.47/11.57 % -------------------------------------------------
% 75.47/11.57 % User time : 52.014 s
% 75.47/11.57 % System time : 1.302 s
% 75.47/11.57 % Total time : 53.316 s
% 75.47/11.57 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 75.47/11.57 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------