↑ Up

SOS---2.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : LCL198-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:28:35 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.72s 1.90s
% Output   : Refutation 1.72s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : LCL198-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jul  3 16:20:23 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.36  The process was started by sandbox2 on n008.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.36  Sun Jul  3 16:20:23 2022
% 0.12/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 23933.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  list(usable).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  This is a Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.36  Knuth-Bendix and hyper_res, with positive clauses in
% 0.12/0.36  sos and nonpositive clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 12 during input processing: 0 [copy,12,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.12/0.39  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.12/0.39  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.12/0.39  number of clauses in intial UL: 2
% 0.12/0.39  number of clauses initially in problem: 11
% 0.12/0.39  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 18
% 0.12/0.39  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 37
% 0.12/0.39  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.12/0.39  absolute distinct symbol count: 8
% 0.12/0.39     distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.12/0.39     distinct function count: 3
% 0.12/0.39     distinct constant count: 2
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.47/0.67  
% 0.47/0.67  
% 0.47/0.67  Changing weight limit from 60 to 22.
% 0.47/0.67  
% 0.47/0.67  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.47/0.67  
% 0.47/0.67  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.47/0.67  
% 0.47/0.67  Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.47/0.67  
% 0.47/0.67  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.47/0.67  
% 0.47/0.67  Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.47/0.67  
% 0.47/0.67  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.47/0.67  
% 0.47/0.67  Resetting weight limit to 22 after 220 givens.
% 0.47/0.67  
% 0.47/0.70  
% 0.47/0.70  
% 0.47/0.70  Changing weight limit from 22 to 18.
% 0.47/0.70  
% 0.47/0.70  Resetting weight limit to 18 after 225 givens.
% 0.47/0.70  
% 0.47/0.72  
% 0.47/0.72  
% 0.47/0.72  Changing weight limit from 18 to 16.
% 0.47/0.72  
% 0.47/0.72  Resetting weight limit to 16 after 235 givens.
% 0.47/0.72  
% 0.56/0.74  
% 0.56/0.74  
% 0.56/0.74  Changing weight limit from 16 to 15.
% 0.56/0.74  
% 0.56/0.74  Resetting weight limit to 15 after 245 givens.
% 0.56/0.74  
% 0.56/0.74  
% 0.56/0.74  
% 0.56/0.74  Changing weight limit from 15 to 14.
% 0.56/0.74  
% 0.56/0.74  Resetting weight limit to 14 after 250 givens.
% 0.56/0.74  
% 0.68/0.86  
% 0.68/0.86  
% 0.68/0.86  Changing weight limit from 14 to 13.
% 0.68/0.86  
% 0.68/0.86  Resetting weight limit to 13 after 335 givens.
% 0.68/0.86  
% 0.77/1.02  
% 0.77/1.02  
% 0.77/1.02  Changing weight limit from 13 to 12.
% 0.77/1.02  
% 0.77/1.02  Resetting weight limit to 12 after 380 givens.
% 0.77/1.02  
% 0.86/1.08  
% 0.86/1.08  
% 0.86/1.08  Changing weight limit from 12 to 13.
% 0.86/1.08  
% 0.86/1.08  Resetting weight limit to 13 after 465 givens.
% 0.86/1.08  
% 0.91/1.09  
% 0.91/1.09  
% 0.91/1.09  Changing weight limit from 13 to 12.
% 0.91/1.09  
% 0.91/1.09  Resetting weight limit to 12 after 475 givens.
% 0.91/1.09  
% 0.91/1.09  
% 0.91/1.09  
% 0.91/1.09  Changing weight limit from 12 to 13.
% 0.91/1.09  
% 0.91/1.09  Resetting weight limit to 13 after 480 givens.
% 0.91/1.09  
% 0.91/1.10  
% 0.91/1.10  
% 0.91/1.10  Changing weight limit from 13 to 12.
% 0.91/1.10  
% 0.91/1.10  Resetting weight limit to 12 after 485 givens.
% 0.91/1.10  
% 0.91/1.10  
% 0.91/1.10  
% 0.91/1.10  Changing weight limit from 12 to 13.
% 0.91/1.10  
% 0.91/1.10  Resetting weight limit to 13 after 495 givens.
% 0.91/1.10  
% 0.91/1.11  
% 0.91/1.11  
% 0.91/1.11  Changing weight limit from 13 to 12.
% 0.91/1.11  
% 0.91/1.11  Resetting weight limit to 12 after 500 givens.
% 0.91/1.11  
% 0.91/1.14  
% 0.91/1.14  
% 0.91/1.14  Changing weight limit from 12 to 13.
% 0.91/1.14  
% 0.91/1.14  Resetting weight limit to 13 after 550 givens.
% 0.91/1.14  
% 0.91/1.14  
% 0.91/1.14  
% 0.91/1.14  Changing weight limit from 13 to 12.
% 0.91/1.14  
% 0.91/1.14  Resetting weight limit to 12 after 555 givens.
% 0.91/1.14  
% 0.91/1.16  
% 0.91/1.16  
% 0.91/1.16  Changing weight limit from 12 to 13.
% 0.91/1.16  
% 0.91/1.16  Resetting weight limit to 13 after 575 givens.
% 0.91/1.16  
% 0.91/1.16  
% 0.91/1.16  
% 0.91/1.16  Changing weight limit from 13 to 12.
% 0.91/1.16  
% 0.91/1.16  Resetting weight limit to 12 after 580 givens.
% 0.91/1.16  
% 1.06/1.27  
% 1.06/1.27  
% 1.06/1.27  Changing weight limit from 12 to 13.
% 1.06/1.27  
% 1.06/1.27  Resetting weight limit to 13 after 675 givens.
% 1.06/1.27  
% 1.06/1.29  
% 1.06/1.29  
% 1.06/1.29  Changing weight limit from 13 to 12.
% 1.06/1.29  
% 1.06/1.29  Resetting weight limit to 12 after 685 givens.
% 1.06/1.29  
% 1.72/1.90  
% 1.72/1.90  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.72/1.90  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.72/1.90  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.72/1.90  
% 1.72/1.90  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   1.40 sec ----> 12684 [binary,12683.1,13.1] {+} $F.
% 1.72/1.90  
% 1.72/1.90  Length of proof is 32.  Level of proof is 17.
% 1.72/1.90  
% 1.72/1.90  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.72/1.90  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.72/1.90  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.72/1.90  
% 1.72/1.90  1 [] {+} theorem(A)| -axiom(A).
% 1.72/1.90  2 [] {+} theorem(A)| -theorem(implies(B,A))| -theorem(B).
% 1.72/1.90  3 [] {-} -theorem(implies(or(not(p),implies(p,q)),implies(p,q))).
% 1.72/1.90  4 [] {+} axiom(implies(or(A,A),A)).
% 1.72/1.90  5 [] {+} axiom(implies(A,or(B,A))).
% 1.72/1.90  6 [] {+} axiom(implies(or(A,B),or(B,A))).
% 1.72/1.90  7 [] {+} axiom(implies(or(A,or(B,C)),or(B,or(A,C)))).
% 1.72/1.90  8 [] {+} axiom(implies(implies(A,B),implies(or(C,A),or(C,B)))).
% 1.72/1.90  9 [] {-} implies(A,B)=or(not(A),B).
% 1.72/1.90  11,10 [copy,9,flip.1] {+} or(not(A),B)=implies(A,B).
% 1.72/1.90  13 [back_demod,3,demod,11] {-} -theorem(implies(implies(p,implies(p,q)),implies(p,q))).
% 1.72/1.90  14 [hyper,4,1] {+} theorem(implies(or(A,A),A)).
% 1.72/1.90  15 [hyper,5,1] {+} theorem(implies(A,or(B,A))).
% 1.72/1.90  16 [hyper,6,1] {+} theorem(implies(or(A,B),or(B,A))).
% 1.72/1.90  21 [hyper,7,1] {+} theorem(implies(or(A,or(B,C)),or(B,or(A,C)))).
% 1.72/1.90  27 [para_into,15.1.1.2,10.1.1] {+} theorem(implies(A,implies(B,A))).
% 1.72/1.90  28 [hyper,8,1] {+} theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(or(C,A),or(C,B)))).
% 1.72/1.90  36 [para_into,16.1.1.1,10.1.1] {+} theorem(implies(implies(A,B),or(B,not(A)))).
% 1.72/1.90  37 [para_into,16.1.1.2,10.1.1] {+} theorem(implies(or(A,not(B)),implies(B,A))).
% 1.72/1.90  64 [para_into,21.1.1.1,10.1.1,demod,11] {+} theorem(implies(implies(A,or(B,C)),or(B,implies(A,C)))).
% 1.72/1.90  74 [hyper,36,2,15] {+} theorem(or(or(A,B),not(B))).
% 1.72/1.90  80 [hyper,74,2,15] {+} theorem(or(A,or(or(B,C),not(C)))).
% 1.72/1.90  128 [hyper,80,2,21] {+} theorem(or(or(A,B),or(C,not(B)))).
% 1.72/1.90  137 [hyper,28,2,37] {+} theorem(implies(or(A,or(B,not(C))),or(A,implies(C,B)))).
% 1.72/1.90  139 [hyper,28,2,27] {+} theorem(implies(or(A,B),or(A,implies(C,B)))).
% 1.72/1.90  143 [hyper,28,2,15] {+} theorem(implies(or(A,B),or(A,or(C,B)))).
% 1.72/1.90  144 [hyper,28,2,14] {+} theorem(implies(or(A,or(B,B)),or(A,B))).
% 1.72/1.90  166 [hyper,128,2,16] {+} theorem(or(or(A,not(B)),or(C,B))).
% 1.72/1.90  196 [hyper,166,2,21] {+} theorem(or(A,or(or(B,not(C)),C))).
% 1.72/1.90  223 [hyper,196,2,14] {+} theorem(or(or(A,not(B)),B)).
% 1.72/1.90  233 [hyper,223,2,16] {+} theorem(or(A,or(B,not(A)))).
% 1.72/1.90  237 [hyper,233,2,21] {+} theorem(or(A,or(B,not(B)))).
% 1.72/1.90  248 [hyper,237,2,14] {+} theorem(or(A,not(A))).
% 1.72/1.90  255 [hyper,248,2,37] {+} theorem(implies(A,A)).
% 1.72/1.90  1521 [hyper,64,2,255] {+} theorem(or(A,implies(or(A,B),B))).
% 1.72/1.90  1687 [hyper,1521,2,16] {+} theorem(or(implies(or(A,B),B),A)).
% 1.72/1.90  2464 [hyper,143,2,1687] {+} theorem(or(implies(or(A,B),B),or(C,A))).
% 1.72/1.90  2523 [para_into,144.1.1.1,10.1.1,demod,11] {+} theorem(implies(implies(A,or(B,B)),implies(A,B))).
% 1.72/1.90  7458 [hyper,2464,2,137,demod,11] {+} theorem(or(implies(implies(A,B),B),implies(A,C))).
% 1.72/1.90  7608 [hyper,2523,2,139] {+} theorem(implies(or(implies(A,B),B),implies(A,B))).
% 1.72/1.90  12683 [hyper,7608,2,7458] {-} theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(A,B)),implies(A,B))).
% 1.72/1.90  12684 [binary,12683.1,13.1] {+} $F.
% 1.72/1.90  
% 1.72/1.90  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.72/1.90  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.72/1.90  
% 1.72/1.90  
% 1.72/1.90  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.72/1.90  
% 1.72/1.90  
% 1.72/1.90  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.72/1.90  
% 1.72/1.90  ============ end of search ============
% 1.72/1.90  
% 1.72/1.90  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.72/1.90  
% 1.72/1.90  true clauses given        1165      (99.6%)
% 1.72/1.90  false clauses given          5
% 1.72/1.90  
% 1.72/1.90        FALSE     TRUE
% 1.72/1.90    10  0         241
% 1.72/1.90    11  0         1509
% 1.72/1.90    12  0         750
% 1.72/1.90  tot:  0         2500      (100.0% true)
% 1.72/1.90  
% 1.72/1.90  
% 1.72/1.90  Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.72/1.90  
% 1.72/1.90  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.72/1.90  
% 1.72/1.90  Process 23933 finished Sun Jul  3 16:20:24 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------