↑ Up

SOS---2.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : LCL201-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:28:37 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.21s 1.40s
% Output   : Refutation 1.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : LCL201-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jul  3 05:01:00 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.34  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.34  The process was started by sandbox on n024.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.34  Sun Jul  3 05:01:00 2022
% 0.12/0.34  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 14925.
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.34  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.34  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  list(usable).
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  This is a Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.34  Knuth-Bendix and hyper_res, with positive clauses in
% 0.12/0.34  sos and nonpositive clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.34    Following clause subsumed by 12 during input processing: 0 [copy,12,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.12/0.39  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.12/0.39  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.12/0.39  number of clauses in intial UL: 2
% 0.12/0.39  number of clauses initially in problem: 11
% 0.12/0.39  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 18
% 0.12/0.39  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 37
% 0.12/0.39  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.12/0.39  absolute distinct symbol count: 8
% 0.12/0.39     distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.12/0.39     distinct function count: 3
% 0.12/0.39     distinct constant count: 2
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.46/0.66  
% 0.46/0.66  
% 0.46/0.66  Changing weight limit from 60 to 22.
% 0.46/0.66  
% 0.46/0.66  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.46/0.66  
% 0.46/0.66  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.46/0.66  
% 0.46/0.66  Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.46/0.66  
% 0.46/0.66  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.46/0.66  
% 0.46/0.66  Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.46/0.66  
% 0.46/0.66  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.46/0.66  
% 0.46/0.66  Resetting weight limit to 22 after 220 givens.
% 0.46/0.66  
% 0.46/0.69  
% 0.46/0.69  
% 0.46/0.69  Changing weight limit from 22 to 18.
% 0.46/0.69  
% 0.46/0.69  Resetting weight limit to 18 after 225 givens.
% 0.46/0.69  
% 0.46/0.71  
% 0.46/0.71  
% 0.46/0.71  Changing weight limit from 18 to 16.
% 0.46/0.71  
% 0.46/0.71  Resetting weight limit to 16 after 235 givens.
% 0.46/0.71  
% 0.55/0.72  
% 0.55/0.72  
% 0.55/0.72  Changing weight limit from 16 to 15.
% 0.55/0.72  
% 0.55/0.72  Resetting weight limit to 15 after 245 givens.
% 0.55/0.72  
% 0.55/0.73  
% 0.55/0.73  
% 0.55/0.73  Changing weight limit from 15 to 14.
% 0.55/0.73  
% 0.55/0.73  Resetting weight limit to 14 after 250 givens.
% 0.55/0.73  
% 0.62/0.85  
% 0.62/0.85  
% 0.62/0.85  Changing weight limit from 14 to 13.
% 0.62/0.85  
% 0.62/0.85  Resetting weight limit to 13 after 335 givens.
% 0.62/0.85  
% 0.76/1.00  
% 0.76/1.00  
% 0.76/1.00  Changing weight limit from 13 to 12.
% 0.76/1.00  
% 0.76/1.00  Resetting weight limit to 12 after 380 givens.
% 0.76/1.00  
% 0.85/1.06  
% 0.85/1.06  
% 0.85/1.06  Changing weight limit from 12 to 13.
% 0.85/1.06  
% 0.85/1.06  Resetting weight limit to 13 after 465 givens.
% 0.85/1.06  
% 0.85/1.06  
% 0.85/1.06  
% 0.85/1.06  Changing weight limit from 13 to 12.
% 0.85/1.06  
% 0.85/1.06  Resetting weight limit to 12 after 475 givens.
% 0.85/1.06  
% 0.85/1.06  
% 0.85/1.06  
% 0.85/1.06  Changing weight limit from 12 to 13.
% 0.85/1.06  
% 0.85/1.06  Resetting weight limit to 13 after 480 givens.
% 0.85/1.06  
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  Changing weight limit from 13 to 12.
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  Resetting weight limit to 12 after 485 givens.
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  Changing weight limit from 12 to 13.
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  Resetting weight limit to 13 after 495 givens.
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.08  
% 0.85/1.08  
% 0.85/1.08  Changing weight limit from 13 to 12.
% 0.85/1.08  
% 0.85/1.08  Resetting weight limit to 12 after 500 givens.
% 0.85/1.08  
% 0.91/1.11  
% 0.91/1.11  
% 0.91/1.11  Changing weight limit from 12 to 13.
% 0.91/1.11  
% 0.91/1.11  Resetting weight limit to 13 after 550 givens.
% 0.91/1.11  
% 0.91/1.11  
% 0.91/1.11  
% 0.91/1.11  Changing weight limit from 13 to 12.
% 0.91/1.11  
% 0.91/1.11  Resetting weight limit to 12 after 555 givens.
% 0.91/1.11  
% 0.91/1.12  
% 0.91/1.12  
% 0.91/1.12  Changing weight limit from 12 to 13.
% 0.91/1.12  
% 0.91/1.12  Resetting weight limit to 13 after 575 givens.
% 0.91/1.12  
% 0.91/1.13  
% 0.91/1.13  
% 0.91/1.13  Changing weight limit from 13 to 12.
% 0.91/1.13  
% 0.91/1.13  Resetting weight limit to 12 after 580 givens.
% 0.91/1.13  
% 1.05/1.23  
% 1.05/1.23  
% 1.05/1.23  Changing weight limit from 12 to 13.
% 1.05/1.23  
% 1.05/1.23  Resetting weight limit to 13 after 675 givens.
% 1.05/1.23  
% 1.06/1.24  
% 1.06/1.24  
% 1.06/1.24  Changing weight limit from 13 to 12.
% 1.06/1.24  
% 1.06/1.24  Resetting weight limit to 12 after 685 givens.
% 1.06/1.24  
% 1.21/1.40  
% 1.21/1.40  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.21/1.40  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.21/1.40  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.21/1.40  
% 1.21/1.40  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.96 sec ----> 9838 [binary,9837.1,13.1] {+} $F.
% 1.21/1.40  
% 1.21/1.40  Length of proof is 31.  Level of proof is 17.
% 1.21/1.40  
% 1.21/1.40  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.21/1.40  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.21/1.40  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.21/1.40  
% 1.21/1.40  1 [] {+} theorem(A)| -axiom(A).
% 1.21/1.40  2 [] {+} theorem(A)| -theorem(implies(B,A))| -theorem(B).
% 1.21/1.40  3 [] {-} -theorem(implies(not(or(p,q)),or(not(p),q))).
% 1.21/1.40  4 [] {+} axiom(implies(or(A,A),A)).
% 1.21/1.40  5 [] {+} axiom(implies(A,or(B,A))).
% 1.21/1.40  6 [] {+} axiom(implies(or(A,B),or(B,A))).
% 1.21/1.40  7 [] {+} axiom(implies(or(A,or(B,C)),or(B,or(A,C)))).
% 1.21/1.40  8 [] {+} axiom(implies(implies(A,B),implies(or(C,A),or(C,B)))).
% 1.21/1.40  9 [] {-} implies(A,B)=or(not(A),B).
% 1.21/1.40  11,10 [copy,9,flip.1] {+} or(not(A),B)=implies(A,B).
% 1.21/1.40  13 [back_demod,3,demod,11] {-} -theorem(implies(not(or(p,q)),implies(p,q))).
% 1.21/1.40  14 [hyper,4,1] {+} theorem(implies(or(A,A),A)).
% 1.21/1.40  15 [hyper,5,1] {+} theorem(implies(A,or(B,A))).
% 1.21/1.40  16 [hyper,6,1] {+} theorem(implies(or(A,B),or(B,A))).
% 1.21/1.40  21 [hyper,7,1] {+} theorem(implies(or(A,or(B,C)),or(B,or(A,C)))).
% 1.21/1.40  28 [hyper,8,1] {+} theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(or(C,A),or(C,B)))).
% 1.21/1.40  36 [para_into,16.1.1.1,10.1.1] {+} theorem(implies(implies(A,B),or(B,not(A)))).
% 1.21/1.40  37 [para_into,16.1.1.2,10.1.1] {+} theorem(implies(or(A,not(B)),implies(B,A))).
% 1.21/1.40  63 [para_into,21.1.1.1.2,10.1.1,demod,11] {+} theorem(implies(or(A,implies(B,C)),implies(B,or(A,C)))).
% 1.21/1.40  74 [hyper,36,2,15] {+} theorem(or(or(A,B),not(B))).
% 1.21/1.40  76 [para_into,36.1.1.2,10.1.1] {+} theorem(implies(implies(A,not(B)),implies(B,not(A)))).
% 1.21/1.40  80 [hyper,74,2,15] {+} theorem(or(A,or(or(B,C),not(C)))).
% 1.21/1.40  128 [hyper,80,2,21] {+} theorem(or(or(A,B),or(C,not(B)))).
% 1.21/1.40  137 [hyper,28,2,37] {+} theorem(implies(or(A,or(B,not(C))),or(A,implies(C,B)))).
% 1.21/1.40  145 [para_into,28.1.1.2.1,10.1.1,demod,11] {+} theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(C,A),implies(C,B)))).
% 1.21/1.40  166 [hyper,128,2,16] {+} theorem(or(or(A,not(B)),or(C,B))).
% 1.21/1.40  196 [hyper,166,2,21] {+} theorem(or(A,or(or(B,not(C)),C))).
% 1.21/1.40  223 [hyper,196,2,14] {+} theorem(or(or(A,not(B)),B)).
% 1.21/1.40  233 [hyper,223,2,16] {+} theorem(or(A,or(B,not(A)))).
% 1.21/1.40  237 [hyper,233,2,21] {+} theorem(or(A,or(B,not(B)))).
% 1.21/1.40  248 [hyper,237,2,14] {+} theorem(or(A,not(A))).
% 1.21/1.40  256 [para_into,248.1.1,10.1.1] {+} theorem(implies(A,not(not(A)))).
% 1.21/1.40  262 [hyper,256,2,28] {+} theorem(implies(or(A,B),or(A,not(not(B))))).
% 1.21/1.40  3052 [para_into,262.1.1.1,10.1.1,demod,11] {+} theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(A,not(not(B))))).
% 1.21/1.40  4301 [hyper,137,2,233] {+} theorem(or(A,implies(A,B))).
% 1.21/1.40  4325 [hyper,4301,2,63] {+} theorem(implies(A,or(A,B))).
% 1.21/1.40  5112 [hyper,145,2,4325] {+} theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(A,or(B,C)))).
% 1.21/1.40  7788 [hyper,3052,2,4325] {+} theorem(implies(A,not(not(or(A,B))))).
% 1.21/1.40  8082 [hyper,7788,2,76] {+} theorem(implies(not(or(A,B)),not(A))).
% 1.21/1.40  9837 [hyper,5112,2,8082,demod,11] {-} theorem(implies(not(or(A,B)),implies(A,C))).
% 1.21/1.40  9838 [binary,9837.1,13.1] {+} $F.
% 1.21/1.40  
% 1.21/1.40  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.21/1.40  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.21/1.40  
% 1.21/1.40  
% 1.21/1.40  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.21/1.40  
% 1.21/1.40  
% 1.21/1.40  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.21/1.40  
% 1.21/1.40  ============ end of search ============
% 1.21/1.40  
% 1.21/1.40  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.21/1.40  
% 1.21/1.40  true clauses given         887      (99.4%)
% 1.21/1.40  false clauses given          5
% 1.21/1.40  
% 1.21/1.40        FALSE     TRUE
% 1.21/1.40    10  0         392
% 1.21/1.40    11  0         1303
% 1.21/1.40    12  0         807
% 1.21/1.40  tot:  0         2502      (100.0% true)
% 1.21/1.40  
% 1.21/1.40  
% 1.21/1.40  Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.21/1.40  
% 1.21/1.40  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.21/1.40  
% 1.21/1.40  Process 14925 finished Sun Jul  3 05:01:01 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------