↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : LCL207-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:58:18 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.40s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   34 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   27 (  15   ~;  12   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   41 (   6 sgn  13   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(rule_1,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] :
      ( ~ axiom(VAR_0)
      | theorem(VAR_0) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',rule_1) ).

cnf(c_1,plain,
    ( ~ axiom(A)
    | theorem(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[rule_1]) ).

fof(axiom_1_5,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] : axiom(or(not(or(VAR_0,or(VAR_1,VAR_2))),or(VAR_1,or(VAR_0,VAR_2)))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_1_5) ).

cnf(c_3,plain,
    axiom(or(not(or(A,or(B,C))),or(B,or(A,C)))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[axiom_1_5]) ).

fof(axiom_1_4,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : axiom(or(not(or(VAR_0,VAR_1)),or(VAR_1,VAR_0))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_1_4) ).

cnf(c_4,plain,
    axiom(or(not(or(A,B)),or(B,A))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[axiom_1_4]) ).

fof(axiom_1_3,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : axiom(or(not(VAR_0),or(VAR_1,VAR_0))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_1_3) ).

cnf(c_5,plain,
    axiom(or(not(A),or(B,A))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[axiom_1_3]) ).

fof(rule_2,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
      ( ~ theorem(VAR_1)
      | ~ axiom(or(not(VAR_1),VAR_0))
      | theorem(VAR_0) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',rule_2) ).

cnf(c_7,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(B)
    | ~ axiom(or(not(B),A))
    | theorem(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[rule_2]) ).

fof(rule_3,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
      ( ~ theorem(or(not(VAR_2),VAR_1))
      | ~ axiom(or(not(VAR_0),VAR_2))
      | theorem(or(not(VAR_0),VAR_1)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',rule_3) ).

cnf(c_8,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(or(not(C),B))
    | ~ axiom(or(not(A),C))
    | theorem(or(not(A),B)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[rule_3]) ).

cnf(c_10,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(or(not(or(C,A)),B))
    | theorem(or(not(A),B)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_8,c_5]) ).

cnf(c_17,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(or(B,or(A,C)))
    | theorem(or(A,or(B,C))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_7,c_3]) ).

cnf(c_21,plain,
    theorem(or(not(or(A,B)),or(B,A))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_4]) ).

fof(prove_this,axiom,
    ~ theorem(or(not(not(or(not(p),q))),or(not(q),p))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

cnf(c_24,plain,
    ~ theorem(or(not(not(or(not(p),q))),or(not(q),p))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).

cnf(c_47,plain,
    theorem(or(not(A),or(A,B))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_10,c_21]) ).

cnf(c_64,plain,
    ~ theorem(or(not(q),or(not(not(or(not(p),q))),p))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_24,c_17]) ).

cnf(c_124,plain,
    theorem(or(A,or(not(A),B))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_17,c_47]) ).

cnf(c_153,plain,
    theorem(or(not(A),or(not(not(or(B,A))),C))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_10,c_124]) ).

cnf(c_154,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_153,c_64]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL207-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.36  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 22:00:48 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.37  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.12/0.37  % Process 3848325 was started by sandbox on n019,
% 0.12/0.37  % Fri Sep 25 22:00:48 2026
% 0.12/0.37  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.15/0.40  
% 0.15/0.40  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.40  
% 0.15/0.40  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.01) seconds.
% 0.15/0.40  % Length of proof is 15.
% 0.15/0.40  % Level of proof is 5.
% 0.15/0.40  % Maximum clause weight is 12.000.
% 0.15/0.40  % Given clauses 40.
% 0.15/0.40  
% 0.15/0.40  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------