↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : LCL211-10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:12:07 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 8.81s 1.69s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.81s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   43 (  43 unt;   0 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   43 (  42 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    9 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   3 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   86 (   8 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(axiom_1_3,axiom,
    axiom(implies(X1,or(X2,X1))) = true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_1_3) ).

cnf(implies_definition,axiom,
    implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',implies_definition) ).

cnf(axiom_1_4,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(X1,X2),or(X2,X1))) = true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_1_4) ).

cnf(rule_2,axiom,
    ifeq(theorem(implies(X1,X2)),true,ifeq(theorem(X1),true,theorem(X2),true),true) = true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_2) ).

cnf(rule_1,axiom,
    ifeq(axiom(X1),true,theorem(X1),true) = true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_1) ).

cnf(ifeq_axiom,axiom,
    ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ifeq_axiom) ).

cnf(axiom_1_5,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(X1,or(X2,X3)),or(X2,or(X1,X3)))) = true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_1_5) ).

cnf(axiom_1_6,axiom,
    axiom(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(or(X3,X1),or(X3,X2)))) = true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_1_6) ).

cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
    theorem(implies(not(q),implies(or(p,q),p))) != true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    axiom(implies(X1,or(X2,X1))) = true,
    axiom_1_3 ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2),
    implies_definition ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(X1,X2),or(X2,X1))) = true,
    axiom_1_4 ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    ifeq(theorem(implies(X1,X2)),true,ifeq(theorem(X1),true,theorem(X2),true),true) = true,
    rule_2 ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    ifeq(axiom(X1),true,theorem(X1),true) = true,
    rule_1 ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    axiom(or(not(X1),or(X2,X1))) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
    ifeq_axiom ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(X1,or(X2,X3)),or(X2,or(X1,X3)))) = true,
    axiom_1_5 ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    axiom(or(not(or(X1,X2)),or(X2,X1))) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ifeq(theorem(or(not(X1),X2)),true,ifeq(theorem(X1),true,theorem(X2),true),true) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    theorem(or(not(X1),or(X2,X1))) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    axiom(or(not(or(X1,or(X2,X3))),or(X2,or(X1,X3)))) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    theorem(or(not(or(X1,X2)),or(X2,X1))) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_17]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
    axiom(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(or(X3,X1),or(X3,X2)))) = true,
    axiom_1_6 ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ifeq(theorem(or(not(or(not(X1),or(X2,X1))),X3)),true,theorem(X3),true) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    theorem(or(not(or(X1,or(X2,X3))),or(X2,or(X1,X3)))) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_20]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ifeq(theorem(or(not(or(not(or(X1,X2)),or(X2,X1))),X3)),true,theorem(X3),true) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_21]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    axiom(or(not(or(not(X1),X2)),or(not(or(X3,X1)),or(X3,X2)))) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_10]),c_0_10]),c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    theorem(or(X1,or(not(X2),X2))) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ifeq(theorem(or(X1,X2)),true,theorem(or(X2,X1)),true) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_21]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    theorem(or(X1,or(not(or(X2,X1)),X2))) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_24]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    theorem(or(not(or(not(X1),X2)),or(not(or(X3,X1)),or(X3,X2)))) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_26]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    theorem(or(not(X1),X1)) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_27]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    theorem(or(or(not(or(X1,X2)),X1),X2)) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ifeq(theorem(or(not(X1),X2)),true,theorem(or(not(or(X3,X1)),or(X3,X2))),true) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_30]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    theorem(or(X1,not(X1))) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_31]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    theorem(implies(not(q),implies(or(p,q),p))) != true,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ifeq(theorem(or(not(or(or(not(or(X1,X2)),X1),X2)),X3)),true,theorem(X3),true) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_32]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    theorem(or(not(or(X1,X2)),or(X1,not(not(X2))))) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    theorem(implies(not(q),implies(or(p,q),p))) != true,
    c_0_35 ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    theorem(or(or(not(or(X1,X2)),X1),not(not(X2)))) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    theorem(or(not(not(q)),or(not(or(p,q)),p))) != true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_10]),c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    theorem(or(not(not(X1)),or(not(or(X2,X1)),X2))) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_39]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : LCL211-10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.43  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.43  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.43  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.43  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/0.43  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/0.43  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.43  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.43  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 00:16:58 UTC 2026
% 0.16/0.43  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.43  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.49  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.50  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 8.81/1.69  % Version: 3.5.1
% 8.81/1.69  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 8.81/1.69  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 8.81/1.69  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 8.81/1.69  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 8.81/1.69  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 8.81/1.69  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 8.81/1.69  % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 1791014 completed with status 0
% 8.81/1.69  % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 8.81/1.69  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 8.81/1.69  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 8.81/1.69  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 8.81/1.69  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 8.81/1.69  % No SInE strategy applied
% 8.81/1.69  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF31-MFFFFFNN
% 8.81/1.69  % Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 8.81/1.69  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 151s (1) cores
% 8.81/1.69  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 500s (1) cores
% 8.81/1.69  % Starting G-E--_103_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y with 251s (1) cores
% 8.81/1.69  % Starting new_bool_3 with 251s (1) cores
% 8.81/1.69  % Starting new_bool_1 with 251s (1) cores
% 8.81/1.69  % G-E--_103_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y with pid 1791021 completed with status 0
% 8.81/1.69  % Result found by G-E--_103_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y
% 8.81/1.69  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 8.81/1.69  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 8.81/1.69  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 8.81/1.69  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 8.81/1.69  % No SInE strategy applied
% 8.81/1.69  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF31-MFFFFFNN
% 8.81/1.69  % Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 8.81/1.69  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 151s (1) cores
% 8.81/1.69  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 500s (1) cores
% 8.81/1.69  % Starting G-E--_103_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y with 251s (1) cores
% 8.81/1.69  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 8.81/1.69  
% 8.81/1.69  % Proof found!
% 8.81/1.69  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 8.81/1.69  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.81/1.69  % Parsed axioms                        : 10
% 8.81/1.69  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 8.81/1.69  % Initial clauses                      : 10
% 8.81/1.69  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 8.81/1.69  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 9
% 8.81/1.69  % Processed clauses                    : 799
% 8.81/1.69  % ...of these trivial                  : 75
% 8.81/1.69  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 8.81/1.69  % ...remaining for further processing  : 724
% 8.81/1.69  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 8.81/1.69  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 8.81/1.69  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 8.81/1.69  % Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 8.81/1.69  % Generated clauses                    : 54891
% 8.81/1.69  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 9086
% 8.81/1.69  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 8.81/1.69  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 8.81/1.69  % Paramodulations                      : 54891
% 8.81/1.69  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 8.81/1.69  % NegExts                              : 0
% 8.81/1.69  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 8.81/1.69  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 8.81/1.69  % Total rewrite steps                  : 68758
% 8.81/1.69  % ...of those cached                   : 27169
% 8.81/1.69  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 8.81/1.69  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 8.81/1.69  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 8.81/1.69  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 8.81/1.69  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 8.81/1.69  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 8.81/1.69  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 8.81/1.69  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 8.81/1.69  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 8.81/1.69  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 8.81/1.69  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 8.81/1.69  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 8.81/1.69  % Current number of processed clauses  : 723
% 8.81/1.69  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 723
% 8.81/1.69  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 8.81/1.69  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 8.81/1.69  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 8.81/1.69  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 8296
% 8.81/1.69  % ...number of literals in the above   : 8296
% 8.81/1.69  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 8.81/1.69  % Current number of archived clauses   : 2
% 8.81/1.69  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 8.81/1.69  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 8.81/1.69  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 8.81/1.69  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 8.81/1.69  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 8.81/1.69  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 47094
% 8.81/1.69  % BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 8.81/1.69  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 8.81/1.69  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 8.81/1.69  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 974289
% 8.81/1.69  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 2
% 8.81/1.69  
% 8.81/1.69  % -------------------------------------------------
% 8.81/1.69  % User time                : 1.104 s
% 8.81/1.69  % System time              : 0.034 s
% 8.81/1.69  % Total time               : 1.138 s
% 8.81/1.69  % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 8.81/1.69  
% 8.81/1.69  % -------------------------------------------------
% 8.81/1.69  % User time                : 5.407 s
% 8.81/1.69  % System time              : 0.205 s
% 8.81/1.69  % Total time               : 5.612 s
% 8.81/1.69  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 8.81/1.69  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------