↑ Up

SOS---2.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : LCL213-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:28:44 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.90s 3.08s
% Output   : Refutation 2.90s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : LCL213-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.32  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.32  % DateTime : Mon Jul  4 09:13:37 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.34  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.34  The process was started by sandbox on n009.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.34  Mon Jul  4 09:13:37 2022
% 0.12/0.34  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 12676.
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.34  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.34  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  list(usable).
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  This is a Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 0.12/0.34  be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.12/0.34  in usable.
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.37  
% 0.19/0.37  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.37  
% 0.19/0.37  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.37  
% 0.19/0.37  
% 0.19/0.37  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.37  
% 0.19/0.37  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.37  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.37  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.37  number of clauses in intial UL: 4
% 0.19/0.37  number of clauses initially in problem: 9
% 0.19/0.37  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 44
% 0.19/0.37  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.19/0.37  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.37  absolute distinct symbol count: 6
% 0.19/0.37     distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.19/0.37     distinct function count: 2
% 0.19/0.37     distinct constant count: 2
% 0.19/0.37  
% 0.19/0.37  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.37  
% 0.19/0.37  
% 0.19/0.37  
% 0.19/0.37  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.37  
% 0.19/0.37  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.37  
% 0.19/0.37  =========== start of search ===========
% 2.90/3.08  
% 2.90/3.08  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 2.90/3.08  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.90/3.08  % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.90/3.08  
% 2.90/3.08  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 2.90/3.08  
% 2.90/3.08  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 2.90/3.08  
% 2.90/3.08  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.90/3.08  
% 2.90/3.08  Model 4 [ 1 0 286 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.90/3.08  
% 2.90/3.08  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.90/3.08  
% 2.90/3.08  Model 5 [ 1 0 1001 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.90/3.08  
% 2.90/3.08  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   2.71 sec ----> 1320 [binary,1319.1,4.1] {-} $F.
% 2.90/3.08  
% 2.90/3.08  Length of proof is 5.  Level of proof is 5.
% 2.90/3.08  
% 2.90/3.08  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 2.90/3.08  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.90/3.08  % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.90/3.08  
% 2.90/3.08  1 [] {+} theorem(A)| -axiom(A).
% 2.90/3.08  2 [] {+} theorem(A)| -axiom(or(not(B),A))| -theorem(B).
% 2.90/3.08  3 [] {+} theorem(or(not(A),B))| -axiom(or(not(A),C))| -theorem(or(not(C),B)).
% 2.90/3.08  4 [] {+} -theorem(or(not(or(not(p),q)),or(not(or(not(not(p)),q)),q))).
% 2.90/3.08  5 [] {+} axiom(or(not(or(A,A)),A)).
% 2.90/3.08  7 [] {-} axiom(or(not(or(A,B)),or(B,A))).
% 2.90/3.08  8 [] {-} axiom(or(not(or(A,or(B,C))),or(B,or(A,C)))).
% 2.90/3.08  9 [] {+} axiom(or(not(or(not(A),B)),or(not(or(C,A)),or(C,B)))).
% 2.90/3.08  10 [hyper,5,1] {+} theorem(or(not(or(A,A)),A)).
% 2.90/3.08  52 [hyper,9,2,10] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,or(B,B))),or(A,B))).
% 2.90/3.08  111 [hyper,52,3,9] {-} theorem(or(not(or(not(A),B)),or(not(or(B,A)),B))).
% 2.90/3.08  605 [hyper,111,2,8] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,B)),or(not(or(not(B),A)),A))).
% 2.90/3.08  1319 [hyper,605,3,7] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,B)),or(not(or(not(A),B)),B))).
% 2.90/3.08  1320 [binary,1319.1,4.1] {-} $F.
% 2.90/3.08  
% 2.90/3.08  % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.90/3.08  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 2.90/3.08  
% 2.90/3.08  
% 2.90/3.08  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.90/3.08  
% 2.90/3.08  
% 2.90/3.08  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.90/3.08  
% 2.90/3.08  ============ end of search ============
% 2.90/3.08  
% 2.90/3.08  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 2.90/3.08  
% 2.90/3.08  true clauses given          82      (32.2%)
% 2.90/3.08  false clauses given        173
% 2.90/3.08  
% 2.90/3.08        FALSE     TRUE
% 2.90/3.08     9  0         18
% 2.90/3.08    11  0         113
% 2.90/3.08    13  74        118
% 2.90/3.08    14  8         3
% 2.90/3.08    15  173       38
% 2.90/3.08    16  10        6
% 2.90/3.08    17  110       37
% 2.90/3.08    18  22        3
% 2.90/3.08    19  55        30
% 2.90/3.08    20  18        3
% 2.90/3.08    21  36        17
% 2.90/3.08    22  9         2
% 2.90/3.08    23  19        4
% 2.90/3.08    24  0         5
% 2.90/3.08    25  10        0
% 2.90/3.08    26  5         2
% 2.90/3.08    27  4         1
% 2.90/3.08    28  6         0
% 2.90/3.08    29  0         5
% 2.90/3.08    30  1         0
% 2.90/3.08    31  3         2
% 2.90/3.08    32  1         0
% 2.90/3.08    33  4         1
% 2.90/3.08    34  1         0
% 2.90/3.08    35  1         1
% 2.90/3.08    36  1         1
% 2.90/3.08    37  2         2
% 2.90/3.08    46  1         0
% 2.90/3.08    47  0         1
% 2.90/3.08    57  1         0
% 2.90/3.08  tot:  575       413      (41.8% true)
% 2.90/3.08  
% 2.90/3.08  
% 2.90/3.08  Model 5 [ 1 0 1001 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.90/3.08  
% 2.90/3.08  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 2.90/3.08  
% 2.90/3.08  Process 12676 finished Mon Jul  4 09:13:40 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------