↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : LCL218-10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:58:21 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 36.51s 5.61s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 36.51s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (  35 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   35 (  34 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    2 (   2   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    9 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   3 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   82 (  10 sgn  16   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(ifeq_axiom,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] : ifeq(VAR_0,VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2) = VAR_1,
    file('theBenchmark.p',ifeq_axiom) ).

cnf(c_1,plain,
    ifeq(A,A,B,C) = B,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[ifeq_axiom]) ).

fof(axiom_1_3,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : axiom(or(not(VAR_0),or(VAR_1,VAR_0))) = true,
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_1_3) ).

cnf(c_3,plain,
    axiom(or(not(A),or(B,A))) = true,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[axiom_1_3]) ).

fof(axiom_1_4,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : axiom(or(not(or(VAR_0,VAR_1)),or(VAR_1,VAR_0))) = true,
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_1_4) ).

cnf(c_4,plain,
    axiom(or(not(or(A,B)),or(B,A))) = true,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[axiom_1_4]) ).

fof(axiom_1_5,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] : axiom(or(not(or(VAR_0,or(VAR_1,VAR_2))),or(VAR_1,or(VAR_0,VAR_2)))) = true,
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_1_5) ).

cnf(c_5,plain,
    axiom(or(not(or(A,or(B,C))),or(B,or(A,C)))) = true,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[axiom_1_5]) ).

fof(rule_1,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] : ifeq(axiom(VAR_0),true,theorem(VAR_0),true) = true,
    file('theBenchmark.p',rule_1) ).

cnf(c_7,plain,
    ifeq(axiom(A),true,theorem(A),true) = true,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[rule_1]) ).

fof(rule_2,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : ifeq(theorem(VAR_0),true,ifeq(axiom(or(not(VAR_0),VAR_1)),true,theorem(VAR_1),true),true) = true,
    file('theBenchmark.p',rule_2) ).

cnf(c_8,plain,
    ifeq(theorem(A),true,ifeq(axiom(or(not(A),B)),true,theorem(B),true),true) = true,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[rule_2]) ).

fof(rule_3,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] : ifeq(theorem(or(not(VAR_0),VAR_1)),true,ifeq(axiom(or(not(VAR_2),VAR_0)),true,theorem(or(not(VAR_2),VAR_1)),true),true) = true,
    file('theBenchmark.p',rule_3) ).

cnf(c_9,plain,
    ifeq(theorem(or(not(A),B)),true,ifeq(axiom(or(not(C),A)),true,theorem(or(not(C),B)),true),true) = true,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[rule_3]) ).

fof(prove_this,axiom,
    theorem(or(not(or(not(or(p,q)),q)),or(not(p),q))) != true,
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

cnf(c_10,plain,
    theorem(or(not(or(not(or(p,q)),q)),or(not(p),q))) != true,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).

cnf(c_4294,plain,
    ifeq(true,true,theorem(or(not(or(A,B)),or(B,A))),true) = true,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_7]) ).

cnf(c_13,plain,
    theorem(or(not(or(A,B)),or(B,A))) = true,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_4294]) ).

cnf(c_4295,plain,
    ifeq(theorem(or(A,or(B,C))),true,ifeq(true,true,theorem(or(B,or(A,C))),true),true) = true,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_5,c_8]) ).

cnf(c_19,plain,
    ifeq(theorem(or(A,or(B,C))),true,theorem(or(B,or(A,C))),true) = true,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_4295]) ).

cnf(c_4296,plain,
    ifeq(theorem(or(not(or(A,B)),C)),true,ifeq(true,true,theorem(or(not(B),C)),true),true) = true,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_3,c_9]) ).

cnf(c_22,plain,
    ifeq(theorem(or(not(or(A,B)),C)),true,theorem(or(not(B),C)),true) = true,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_4296]) ).

cnf(c_4297,plain,
    ifeq(theorem(or(not(or(A,B)),C)),true,ifeq(true,true,theorem(or(not(or(B,A)),C)),true),true) = true,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_9]) ).

cnf(c_23,plain,
    ifeq(theorem(or(not(or(A,B)),C)),true,theorem(or(not(or(B,A)),C)),true) = true,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_4297]) ).

cnf(c_4298,plain,
    ifeq(true,true,theorem(or(A,or(not(or(B,A)),B))),true) = true,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_13,c_19]) ).

cnf(c_124,plain,
    theorem(or(A,or(not(or(B,A)),B))) = true,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_4298]) ).

cnf(c_4299,plain,
    ifeq(true,true,theorem(or(not(or(A,B)),or(not(or(C,not(or(B,A)))),C))),true) = true,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_124,c_23]) ).

cnf(c_236,plain,
    theorem(or(not(or(A,B)),or(not(or(C,not(or(B,A)))),C))) = true,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_4299]) ).

cnf(c_4300,plain,
    ifeq(true,true,theorem(or(not(A),or(not(or(B,not(or(A,C)))),B))),true) = true,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_236,c_22]) ).

cnf(c_3091,plain,
    theorem(or(not(A),or(not(or(B,not(or(A,C)))),B))) = true,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_4300]) ).

cnf(c_4301,plain,
    ifeq(true,true,theorem(or(not(or(A,not(or(B,C)))),or(not(B),A))),true) = true,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_3091,c_19]) ).

cnf(c_4280,plain,
    theorem(or(not(or(A,not(or(B,C)))),or(not(B),A))) = true,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_4301]) ).

cnf(c_4302,plain,
    ifeq(true,true,theorem(or(not(or(not(or(A,B)),C)),or(not(A),C))),true) = true,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_4280,c_23]) ).

cnf(c_4292,plain,
    theorem(or(not(or(not(or(A,B)),C)),or(not(A),C))) = true,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_4302]) ).

cnf(c_4293,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_4292,c_10]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL218-10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.37  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 22:00:10 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.37  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.09/0.37  % Process 2028561 was started by sandbox2 on n007,
% 0.09/0.37  % Fri Sep 25 22:00:10 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.09/0.38  
% 0.09/0.38  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 36.51/5.61  
% 36.51/5.61  % given #500 (W,wt=58): 366 theorem(or(A,or(or(not(B),or(B,C)),D))) = true.  [para(302(a,1),17(a,1,1)),rewrite([1(10)])].
% 36.51/5.61  
% 36.51/5.61  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 36.51/5.61  
% 36.51/5.61  % Proof 1 at 3.61 (+ 1.28) seconds.
% 36.51/5.61  % Length of proof is 18.
% 36.51/5.61  % Level of proof is 7.
% 36.51/5.61  % Maximum clause weight is 62.000.
% 36.51/5.61  % Given clauses 944.
% 36.51/5.61  
% 36.51/5.61  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------