%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem : LCL225-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:51:15 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 11.43s 7.93s
% Output : Refutation 11.43s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 19
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 114 ( 46 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 325 ( 53 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 2082 ( 169 ~; 107 |; 0 &;1806 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 16 ( 9 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 10 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 229 ( 0 ^; 229 !; 0 ?; 229 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(theorem_decl,type,
theorem: $i > $o ).
thf(or_decl,type,
or: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(not_decl,type,
not: $i > $i ).
thf(p_decl,type,
p: $i ).
thf(q_decl,type,
q: $i ).
thf(r_decl,type,
r: $i ).
thf(axiom_decl,type,
axiom: $i > $o ).
thf(3,axiom,
! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ axiom ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_1_3) ).
thf(13,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ axiom ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
thf(8,axiom,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( B @ theorem )
| ~ ( A @ ( B @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
| ( A @ theorem ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_2) ).
thf(19,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( B @ theorem )
| ~ ( A @ ( B @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
| ( A @ theorem ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
thf(20,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( B @ theorem )
| ~ ( A @ ( B @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
| ( A @ theorem ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[19]) ).
thf(26,plain,
! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
!= ( C @ ( D @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) )
| ~ ( D @ theorem )
| ~ $true
| ( C @ theorem ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[13,20]) ).
thf(27,plain,
! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
!= ( C @ ( D @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) )
| ~ ( D @ theorem )
| ( C @ theorem ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[26]) ).
thf(28,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( B @ theorem )
| ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ theorem ) ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[27:[bind(A,$thf( F )),bind(B,$thf( E )),bind(C,$thf( F @ ( E @ or ) )),bind(D,$thf( F ))]]) ).
thf(33,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( B @ theorem )
| ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ theorem ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[28]) ).
thf(5,axiom,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] : ( C @ ( A @ or ) @ ( B @ or ) @ ( C @ ( B @ or ) @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_1_5) ).
thf(15,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] : ( C @ ( A @ or ) @ ( B @ or ) @ ( C @ ( B @ or ) @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).
thf(9,axiom,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( B @ ( C @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
| ~ ( C @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
| ( B @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_3) ).
thf(21,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( B @ ( C @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
| ~ ( C @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
| ( B @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).
thf(22,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( B @ ( C @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
| ~ ( C @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
| ( B @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[21]) ).
thf(1,negated_conjecture,
~ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
thf(10,plain,
~ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).
thf(11,plain,
~ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ),
inference(polarity_switch,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
thf(50,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
!= ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) )
| ~ $true
| ~ ( B @ ( C @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
| ~ ( C @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[22,11]) ).
thf(51,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
!= ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) )
| ~ ( B @ ( C @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
| ~ ( C @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[50]) ).
thf(52,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ~ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
| ~ ( A @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[51:[bind(A,$thf( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ ( p @ not @ or ) )),bind(B,$thf( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) )),bind(C,$thf( C ))]]) ).
thf(54,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ~ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
| ~ ( A @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[52]) ).
thf(75,plain,
! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( C @ ( A @ or ) @ ( B @ or ) @ ( C @ ( B @ or ) @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
!= ( D @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) )
| ~ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( D @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
| ~ $true ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[15,54]) ).
thf(76,plain,
! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( C @ ( A @ or ) @ ( B @ or ) @ ( C @ ( B @ or ) @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
!= ( D @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) )
| ~ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( D @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[75]) ).
thf(77,plain,
~ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[76:[bind(A,$thf( p @ not )),bind(B,$thf( q @ not )),bind(C,$thf( r )),bind(D,$thf( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ not @ or ) ))]]) ).
thf(506,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ theorem )
!= ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) )
| ~ $true
| ~ ( B @ theorem ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[33,77]) ).
thf(507,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ theorem )
!= ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) )
| ~ ( B @ theorem ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[506]) ).
thf(508,plain,
~ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[507:[bind(A,$thf( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ not )),bind(B,$thf( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) ))]]) ).
thf(600,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ theorem )
!= ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) )
| ~ $true
| ~ ( B @ theorem ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[33,508]) ).
thf(601,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ theorem )
!= ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) )
| ~ ( B @ theorem ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[600]) ).
thf(602,plain,
~ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ theorem ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[601:[bind(A,$thf( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not )),bind(B,$thf( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) ))]]) ).
thf(627,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ theorem )
!= ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) )
| ~ $true
| ~ ( B @ theorem ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[33,602]) ).
thf(628,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ theorem )
!= ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) )
| ~ ( B @ theorem ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[627]) ).
thf(629,plain,
~ ( r @ theorem ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[628:[bind(A,$thf( p @ not )),bind(B,$thf( r ))]]) ).
thf(4,axiom,
! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_1_4) ).
thf(14,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(23,plain,
! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
!= ( C @ ( D @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) )
| ~ ( D @ theorem )
| ~ $true
| ( C @ theorem ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[14,20]) ).
thf(24,plain,
! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
!= ( C @ ( D @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) )
| ~ ( D @ theorem )
| ( C @ theorem ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[23]) ).
thf(25,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ theorem )
| ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ theorem ) ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[24:[bind(A,$thf( H )),bind(B,$thf( G )),bind(C,$thf( H @ ( G @ or ) )),bind(D,$thf( G @ ( H @ or ) ))]]) ).
thf(32,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ theorem )
| ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ theorem ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[25]) ).
thf(66,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
!= ( C @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) )
| ~ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( C @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
| ~ $true ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[14,54]) ).
thf(67,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
!= ( C @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) )
| ~ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( C @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[66]) ).
thf(68,plain,
~ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( p @ not @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[67:[bind(A,$thf( p @ not )),bind(B,$thf( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) )),bind(C,$thf( p @ not @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ or ) ))]]) ).
thf(251,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ theorem )
!= ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( p @ not @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) )
| ~ $true
| ~ ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ theorem ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[32,68]) ).
thf(252,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ theorem )
!= ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( p @ not @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) )
| ~ ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ theorem ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[251]) ).
thf(253,plain,
~ ( p @ not @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ or ) @ not @ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ or ) @ theorem ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[252:[bind(A,$thf( p @ not @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ or ) @ not )),bind(B,$thf( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) ))]]) ).
thf(7,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ axiom )
| ( A @ theorem ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_1) ).
thf(17,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ axiom )
| ( A @ theorem ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).
thf(18,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ axiom )
| ( A @ theorem ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[17]) ).
thf(114,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
!= ( C @ axiom ) )
| ~ $true
| ( C @ theorem ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[13,18]) ).
thf(115,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
!= ( C @ axiom ) )
| ( C @ theorem ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[114]) ).
thf(116,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ ( B @ not @ or ) @ theorem ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[115:[bind(A,$thf( H )),bind(B,$thf( G )),bind(C,$thf( H @ ( G @ or ) @ ( H @ not @ or ) ))]]) ).
thf(127,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ ( B @ not @ or ) @ theorem ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[116]) ).
thf(167,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ ( B @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
!= ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( C @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) )
| ~ $true
| ~ ( C @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[127,54]) ).
thf(168,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ ( B @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
!= ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( C @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) )
| ~ ( C @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[167]) ).
thf(169,plain,
~ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[168:[bind(A,$thf( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not )),bind(B,$thf( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) )),bind(C,$thf( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) ))]]) ).
thf(111,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
!= ( C @ axiom ) )
| ~ $true
| ( C @ theorem ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[14,18]) ).
thf(112,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
!= ( C @ axiom ) )
| ( C @ theorem ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[111]) ).
thf(113,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[112:[bind(A,$thf( J )),bind(B,$thf( I )),bind(C,$thf( J @ ( I @ or ) @ ( I @ ( J @ or ) @ not @ or ) ))]]) ).
thf(126,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[113]) ).
thf(83,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
!= ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( p @ not @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) )
| ~ $true
| ~ ( B @ ( C @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
| ~ ( C @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[22,68]) ).
thf(84,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
!= ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( p @ not @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) )
| ~ ( B @ ( C @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
| ~ ( C @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[83]) ).
thf(85,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ~ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
| ~ ( A @ ( p @ not @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[84:[bind(A,$thf( p @ not @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ or ) )),bind(B,$thf( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) )),bind(C,$thf( C ))]]) ).
thf(86,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ~ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
| ~ ( A @ ( p @ not @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[85]) ).
thf(388,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
!= ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( C @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) )
| ~ $true
| ~ ( C @ ( p @ not @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[126,86]) ).
thf(389,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
!= ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( C @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) )
| ~ ( C @ ( p @ not @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[388]) ).
thf(390,plain,
~ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ or ) @ ( p @ not @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[389:[bind(A,$thf( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not )),bind(B,$thf( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) )),bind(C,$thf( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ or ) ))]]) ).
thf(636,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ theorem )
!= ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) )
| ~ $true
| ~ ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ theorem ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[32,602]) ).
thf(637,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ theorem )
!= ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) )
| ~ ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ theorem ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[636]) ).
thf(638,plain,
~ ( p @ not @ ( r @ or ) @ theorem ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[637:[bind(A,$thf( p @ not )),bind(B,$thf( r ))]]) ).
thf(2,axiom,
! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_1_2) ).
thf(12,plain,
! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(120,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
!= ( B @ axiom ) )
| ~ $true
| ( B @ theorem ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[12,18]) ).
thf(121,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
!= ( B @ axiom ) )
| ( B @ theorem ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[120]) ).
thf(122,plain,
! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[121:[bind(A,$thf( D )),bind(B,$thf( D @ ( D @ ( D @ or ) @ not @ or ) ))]]) ).
thf(129,plain,
! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[122]) ).
thf(273,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
!= ( B @ ( C @ or ) @ theorem ) )
| ~ $true
| ( C @ ( B @ or ) @ theorem ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[129,32]) ).
thf(274,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
!= ( B @ ( C @ or ) @ theorem ) )
| ( C @ ( B @ or ) @ theorem ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[273]) ).
thf(275,plain,
! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ ( A @ or ) @ theorem ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[274:[bind(A,$thf( F )),bind(B,$thf( F )),bind(C,$thf( F @ ( F @ or ) @ not ))]]) ).
thf(296,plain,
! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ ( A @ or ) @ theorem ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[275]) ).
thf(134,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
!= ( C @ ( p @ not @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) )
| ~ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( C @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
| ~ $true ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[13,86]) ).
thf(135,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
!= ( C @ ( p @ not @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) )
| ~ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( C @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[134]) ).
thf(136,plain,
! [A: $i] :
~ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( p @ not @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ or ) @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[135:[bind(A,$thf( p @ not @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ or ) )),bind(B,$thf( J )),bind(C,$thf( p @ not @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ or ) @ ( J @ or ) ))]]) ).
thf(149,plain,
! [A: $i] :
~ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( p @ not @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ or ) @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[136]) ).
thf(248,plain,
! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ ( B @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
!= ( C @ ( D @ or ) @ theorem ) )
| ~ $true
| ( D @ ( C @ or ) @ theorem ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[127,32]) ).
thf(249,plain,
! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ ( B @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
!= ( C @ ( D @ or ) @ theorem ) )
| ( D @ ( C @ or ) @ theorem ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[248]) ).
thf(250,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( B @ not @ ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ or ) @ theorem ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[249:[bind(A,$thf( F )),bind(B,$thf( G )),bind(C,$thf( G @ ( F @ or ) )),bind(D,$thf( G @ not ))]]) ).
thf(259,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( B @ not @ ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ or ) @ theorem ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[250]) ).
thf(170,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ ( B @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
!= ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( C @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) )
| ~ $true
| ~ ( C @ ( p @ not @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[127,86]) ).
thf(171,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ ( B @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
!= ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( C @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) )
| ~ ( C @ ( p @ not @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[170]) ).
thf(172,plain,
~ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( p @ not @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[171:[bind(A,$thf( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not )),bind(B,$thf( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) )),bind(C,$thf( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) ))]]) ).
thf(69,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
!= ( C @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) )
| ~ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( C @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
| ~ $true ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[13,54]) ).
thf(70,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
!= ( C @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) )
| ~ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( C @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[69]) ).
thf(71,plain,
! [A: $i] :
~ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[70:[bind(A,$thf( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ ( p @ not @ or ) )),bind(B,$thf( J )),bind(C,$thf( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( J @ or ) ))]]) ).
thf(81,plain,
! [A: $i] :
~ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[71]) ).
thf(6,axiom,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] : ( B @ ( C @ or ) @ ( A @ ( C @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( B @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_1_6) ).
thf(16,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] : ( B @ ( C @ or ) @ ( A @ ( C @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( B @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).
thf(93,plain,
! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( C @ or ) @ ( A @ ( C @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( B @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
!= ( D @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) )
| ~ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( D @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
| ~ $true ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[16,54]) ).
thf(94,plain,
! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( C @ or ) @ ( A @ ( C @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( B @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
!= ( D @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) )
| ~ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( D @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[93]) ).
thf(95,plain,
! [A: $i] :
~ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ ( A @ or ) @ ( p @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[94:[bind(A,$thf( p )),bind(B,$thf( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) )),bind(C,$thf( M )),bind(D,$thf( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ ( M @ or ) @ ( p @ ( M @ or ) @ not @ or ) ))]]) ).
thf(98,plain,
! [A: $i] :
~ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ ( A @ or ) @ ( p @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[95]) ).
thf(385,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
!= ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( C @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) )
| ~ $true
| ~ ( C @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[126,54]) ).
thf(386,plain,
! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
!= ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( C @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) )
| ~ ( C @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[385]) ).
thf(387,plain,
~ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ or ) @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[386:[bind(A,$thf( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not )),bind(B,$thf( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) )),bind(C,$thf( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ or ) ))]]) ).
thf(191,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
!= ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) )
| ~ $true ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[12,169]) ).
thf(192,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
!= ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[191]) ).
thf(198,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) )
!= ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[192]) ).
thf(500,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ theorem )
!= ( p @ not @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ or ) @ not @ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ or ) @ theorem ) )
| ~ $true
| ~ ( B @ theorem ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[33,253]) ).
thf(501,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ theorem )
!= ( p @ not @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ or ) @ not @ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ or ) @ theorem ) )
| ~ ( B @ theorem ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[500]) ).
thf(502,plain,
~ ( p @ not @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ or ) @ not @ theorem ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[501:[bind(A,$thf( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( q @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) )),bind(B,$thf( p @ not @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ or ) @ or ) @ not ))]]) ).
thf(377,plain,
! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
!= ( C @ ( D @ or ) @ theorem ) )
| ~ $true
| ( D @ ( C @ or ) @ theorem ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[126,32]) ).
thf(378,plain,
! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
!= ( C @ ( D @ or ) @ theorem ) )
| ( D @ ( C @ or ) @ theorem ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[377]) ).
thf(379,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ not @ ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ or ) @ theorem ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[378:[bind(A,$thf( H )),bind(B,$thf( I )),bind(C,$thf( I @ ( H @ or ) )),bind(D,$thf( H @ ( I @ or ) @ not ))]]) ).
thf(405,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ not @ ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ or ) @ theorem ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[379]) ).
thf(1037,plain,
$false,
inference(e,[status(thm)],[629,10,14,253,602,169,77,508,18,11,390,126,638,20,21,33,13,129,32,296,17,149,22,259,12,54,86,172,81,98,387,198,16,502,127,405,19,15,68]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : LCL225-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.12/5.41 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/5.41 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/5.41 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/5.41 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/5.41 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/5.41 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/5.41 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/5.41 % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 22:04:24 UTC 2026
% 0.12/5.41 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/5.41 Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.18/5.70 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.18/5.80 % [INFO] Parsing done (94ms).
% 0.18/5.80 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 0.18/5.99 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 0.18/5.99 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 1.50/6.04 % [INFO] Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 8 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 1.50/6.05 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 8 axioms (removed 0 axioms).
% 1.50/6.07 % [INFO] Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF).
% 1.50/6.07 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 1.50/6.07 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 11.43/7.92 % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 11.43/7.92 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 11.43/7.92 % Time passed: 2429ms (effective reasoning time: 2118ms)
% 11.43/7.93 % Axioms used in derivation (8): axiom_1_5, axiom_1_4, rule_1, axiom_1_3, rule_3, axiom_1_2, rule_2, axiom_1_6
% 11.43/7.93 % No. of inferences in proof: 114
% 11.43/7.93 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2429 ms resp. 2118 ms w/o parsing
% 11.43/8.02 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 11.43/8.03 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------