↑ Up

hopCoP---0.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : hopCoP---0.1
% Problem  : LCL226-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 12:13:27 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.09s 0.37s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL226-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Sep  4 18:37:59 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.37  % launching worker at depth: 1
% 0.09/0.37  % launching worker at depth: 5
% 0.09/0.37  % launching worker at depth: 7
% 0.09/0.37  % launching worker at depth: 4
% 0.09/0.37  % launching worker at depth: 2
% 0.09/0.37  % launching worker at depth: 6
% 0.09/0.37  % launching worker at depth: 3
% 0.09/0.37  % launching worker at depth: 8
% 0.09/0.37  % launching worker at depth: 9
% 0.09/0.37  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.09/0.37  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.09/0.37  % launching worker at depth: cnf(8, plain, ~theorem(or(not(or(q,r)),or(not(or(not(r),s)),or(q,s)))), inference(cnf, [status(esa)], [prove_this])).
% 0.09/0.37  10
% 0.09/0.37  cnf(l0, plain, ~theorem(or(not(or(q,r)),or(not(or(not(r),s)),or(q,s)))), inference(instantiation, [status(thm)], [8])).
% 0.09/0.37  cnf(6, plain, ~theorem(X0) | ~axiom(or(not(X0),X1)) | theorem(X1), inference(cnf, [status(esa)], [rule_2])).
% 0.09/0.37  cnf(l1, plain, ~theorem(or(not(or(not(r),s)),or(not(or(q,r)),or(q,s)))) | ~axiom(or(not(or(not(or(not(r),s)),or(not(or(q,r)),or(q,s)))),or(not(or(q,r)),or(not(or(not(r),s)),or(q,s))))) | theorem(or(not(or(q,r)),or(not(or(not(r),s)),or(q,s)))), inference(instantiation, [status(thm)], [6])).
% 0.09/0.37  cnf(3, plain, axiom(or(not(or(X0,or(X1,X2))),or(X1,or(X0,X2)))), inference(cnf, [status(esa)], [axiom_1_5])).
% 0.09/0.37  cnf(l3, plain, axiom(or(not(or(not(or(not(r),s)),or(not(or(q,r)),or(q,s)))),or(not(or(q,r)),or(not(or(not(r),s)),or(q,s))))), inference(instantiation, [status(thm)], [3])).
% 0.09/0.37  cnf(5, plain, ~axiom(X0) | theorem(X0), inference(cnf, [status(esa)], [rule_1])).
% 0.09/0.37  cnf(l2, plain, ~axiom(or(not(or(not(r),s)),or(not(or(q,r)),or(q,s)))) | theorem(or(not(or(not(r),s)),or(not(or(q,r)),or(q,s)))), inference(instantiation, [status(thm)], [5])).
% 0.09/0.37  cnf(4, plain, axiom(or(not(or(not(X0),X1)),or(not(or(X2,X0)),or(X2,X1)))), inference(cnf, [status(esa)], [axiom_1_6])).
% 0.09/0.37  cnf(l5, plain, axiom(or(not(or(not(r),s)),or(not(or(q,r)),or(q,s)))), inference(instantiation, [status(thm)], [4])).
% 0.09/0.37  cnf(final, plain, $false, inference(ground_refutation, [status(thm)], [l0, l1, l3, l2, l5])).
% 0.09/0.37  % SZS output end CNFRefutation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------