↑ Up

FindProof---0.1.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : FindProof---0.1
% Problem  : LCL230+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_findproof /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:01:28 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 6.16s 6.29s
% Output   : Proof 6.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   24 (  20 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   48 (  17 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   41 (  17   ~;  10   |;   8   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   4 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    6 (   0 sgn   0   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f0,conjecture,
    ( ( ( q
        | p )
     => ( r
        | p ) )
   => ( ( q
       => r )
      | p ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',pel5) ).

fof(f0_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( ( q
          | p )
       => ( r
          | p ) )
     => ( ( q
         => r )
        | p ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f0]) ).

fof(f0_nnf,plain,
    ( ~ r
    & q
    & ~ p
    & ( r
      | p
      | ( ~ q
        & ~ p ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f0_neg]) ).

fof(f0_sk,plain,
    ( ~ r
    & q
    & ~ p
    & ( r
      | p
      | ( ~ q
        & ~ p ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa)],[f0_nnf]) ).

cnf(c4,plain,
    ~ r,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f0_sk]) ).

cnf(t1,plain,
    r = false,
    inference(equality_encoding,[status(esa)],[c4]) ).

cnf(c2,plain,
    ~ p,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f0_sk]) ).

cnf(t0,plain,
    p = false,
    inference(equality_encoding,[status(esa)],[c2]) ).

cnf(t22,plain,
    false = p,
    inference(orient,[status(thm)],[t0]) ).

cnf(t37,plain,
    r = p,
    inference(step,[status(thm)],[t1,t22]) ).

cnf(t27,plain,
    p = r,
    inference(orient,[status(thm)],[t37]) ).

cnf(t3,plain,
    or(X1,false) = X1,
    introduced(definition) ).

cnf(t12,plain,
    or(X1,false) = X1,
    inference(orient,[status(thm)],[t3]) ).

cnf(t33,plain,
    or(X1,p) = X1,
    inference(step,[status(thm)],[t12,t22]) ).

cnf(t23,plain,
    or(X1,p) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[t33]) ).

cnf(t41,plain,
    or(X1,r) = X1,
    inference(step,[status(thm)],[t23,t27]) ).

cnf(t31,plain,
    or(X1,r) = X1,
    inference(orient,[status(thm)],[t41]) ).

cnf(goal_0,negated_conjecture,
    true != false,
    inference(equality_encoding,[status(esa)],[c2,c4]) ).

cnf(g0_0,plain,
    p != false,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[goal_0]) ).

cnf(g0_1,plain,
    r != false,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[g0_0,t27]) ).

cnf(g0_2,plain,
    r != or(p,r),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[g0_1]) ).

cnf(g0_3,plain,
    r != or(r,r),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[g0_2,t27]) ).

cnf(g0_4,plain,
    r != r,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[g0_3,t31]) ).

cnf(contradiction_0,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[g0_4]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : LCL230+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_findproof /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.16/5.44  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.16/5.44  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/5.44  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/5.44  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/5.44  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/5.44  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/5.44  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/5.44  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 22:30:01 UTC 2026
% 0.16/5.44  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/5.44  Running run_findproof /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 6.16/6.29  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 6.16/6.29  % SZS output start Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------