%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : LCL238-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:06:07 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.73s 26.14s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.73s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 16
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 43 ( 28 unt; 8 def)
% Number of atoms : 105 ( 8 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 42 ( 23 ~; 19 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 12 ( 10 usr; 9 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 44 ( 0 sgn 44 !; 0 ?; 30 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
! [X0] : axiom(or(not(or(X0,X0)),X0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL003-0.ax',axiom_1_2) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
! [X0,X1] : axiom(or(not(X0),or(X1,X0))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL003-0.ax',axiom_1_3) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
! [X0,X1] : axiom(or(not(or(X0,X1)),or(X1,X0))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL003-0.ax',axiom_1_4) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] : axiom(or(not(or(X0,or(X1,X2))),or(X1,or(X0,X2)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL003-0.ax',axiom_1_5) ).
fof(f6,axiom,
! [X0] :
( ~ axiom(X0)
| theorem(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL003-0.ax',rule_1) ).
fof(f7,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ theorem(X1)
| ~ axiom(or(not(X1),X0))
| theorem(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL003-0.ax',rule_2) ).
fof(f8,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ theorem(or(not(X2),X1))
| ~ axiom(or(not(X0),X2))
| theorem(or(not(X0),X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL003-0.ax',rule_3) ).
fof(f9,negated_conjecture,
~ theorem(or(not(not(or(not(p),not(q)))),not(or(not(q),not(p))))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
tcf(c_58,plain,
! [X0: $i] : axiom(or(not(or(X0,X0)),X0)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).
tcf(c_59,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : axiom(or(not(X0),or(X1,X0))),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).
tcf(c_60,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : axiom(or(not(or(X0,X1)),or(X1,X0))),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).
tcf(c_61,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : axiom(or(not(or(X0,or(X1,X2))),or(X1,or(X0,X2)))),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).
tcf(c_63,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( theorem(X0)
| ~ axiom(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
tcf(c_64,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( theorem(X1)
| ~ theorem(X0)
| ~ axiom(or(not(X0),X1)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).
tcf(c_65,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( theorem(or(not(X2),X1))
| ~ axiom(or(not(X2),X0))
| ~ theorem(or(not(X0),X1)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).
tcf(c_66,negated_conjecture,
~ theorem(or(not(not(or(not(p),not(q)))),not(or(not(q),not(p))))),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).
tcf(c_225,definition,
iPr_def_10 = not(p),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).
tcf(c_226,definition,
iPr_def_11 = not(q),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).
tcf(c_227,definition,
iPr_def_12 = or(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).
tcf(c_228,definition,
iPr_def_13 = not(iPr_def_12),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).
tcf(c_229,definition,
iPr_def_14 = not(iPr_def_13),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).
tcf(c_230,definition,
iPr_def_15 = or(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_10),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_15])],[]) ).
tcf(c_231,definition,
iPr_def_16 = not(iPr_def_15),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_16])],[]) ).
tcf(c_232,definition,
iPr_def_17 = or(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_16),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_17])],[]) ).
tcf(c_233,negated_conjecture,
~ theorem(iPr_def_17),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_66,c_230,c_231,c_226,c_225,c_227,c_228,c_229,c_232]) ).
tcf(c_406,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : theorem(or(not(X0),or(X1,X0))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_63]) ).
tcf(c_415,plain,
axiom(or(not(or(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_10)),iPr_def_12)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_227,c_60]) ).
tcf(c_417,plain,
axiom(or(not(or(iPr_def_16,iPr_def_14)),iPr_def_17)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_232,c_60]) ).
tcf(c_420,plain,
axiom(or(iPr_def_16,iPr_def_12)),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_415,c_230,c_231]) ).
tcf(c_438,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( theorem(X0)
| ~ theorem(or(X0,X0)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_58,c_64]) ).
tcf(c_440,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( theorem(or(X1,X0))
| ~ theorem(or(X0,X1)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_60,c_64]) ).
tcf(c_498,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( theorem(or(X1,or(X0,X2)))
| ~ theorem(or(X0,or(X1,X2))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_61,c_64]) ).
tcf(c_738,plain,
( theorem(iPr_def_17)
| ~ theorem(or(iPr_def_16,iPr_def_14)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_417,c_64]) ).
tcf(c_739,plain,
~ theorem(or(iPr_def_16,iPr_def_14)),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_738,c_233]) ).
tcf(c_986,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : theorem(or(X0,or(not(X1),X1))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_406,c_498]) ).
tcf(c_1315,plain,
! [X0: $i] : theorem(or(not(X0),X0)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_986,c_438]) ).
tcf(c_1326,plain,
! [X0: $i] : theorem(or(X0,not(X0))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1315,c_440]) ).
tcf(c_1409,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( theorem(or(not(X0),not(not(X1))))
| ~ axiom(or(not(X0),X1)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1326,c_65]) ).
tcf(c_8194,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( theorem(or(not(X0),not(iPr_def_13)))
| ~ axiom(or(not(X0),iPr_def_12)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_228,c_1409]) ).
tcf(c_8207,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( theorem(or(not(X0),iPr_def_14))
| ~ axiom(or(not(X0),iPr_def_12)) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_8194,c_229]) ).
tcf(c_8322,plain,
( theorem(or(not(iPr_def_15),iPr_def_14))
| ~ axiom(or(iPr_def_16,iPr_def_12)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_231,c_8207]) ).
tcf(c_8323,plain,
( theorem(or(iPr_def_16,iPr_def_14))
| ~ axiom(or(iPr_def_16,iPr_def_12)) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_8322,c_231]) ).
tcf(c_8324,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_8323,c_739,c_420]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : LCL238-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.3.0.
% 0.00/0.03 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.08/0.34 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.34 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.34 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.05/25.47 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.05/25.47 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.05/25.47 % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 22:31:10 UTC 2026
% 0.05/25.47 % CPUTime :
% 0.05/25.47 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.05/25.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.05/25.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/25.50
% 0.18/25.50 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.18/25.50
% 0.18/25.50 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.18/25.51 % Proving...
% 1.73/26.14 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.73/26.14 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.73/26.14
% 1.73/26.14 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.73/26.14
% 1.73/26.14 % ------ iProver source info
% 1.73/26.14
% 1.73/26.14 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.73/26.14 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.73/26.14 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.73/26.14
% 1.73/26.14 % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 1.73/26.14
% 1.73/26.14
% 1.73/26.14 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 1.73/26.14
% 1.73/26.14 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e %
% 1.73/26.14
% 1.73/26.14 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 1.73/26.14
% 1.73/26.14 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 1.73/26.14 % ------ Proving...
% 1.73/26.14 % ------ Problem Properties
% 1.73/26.14
% 1.73/26.14 %
% 1.73/26.14 % clauses 17
% 1.73/26.14 % conjectures 1
% 1.73/26.14 % EPR 2
% 1.73/26.14 % Horn 17
% 1.73/26.14 % unary 14
% 1.73/26.14 % binary 1
% 1.73/26.14 % lits 22
% 1.73/26.14 % lits eq 8
% 1.73/26.14 % fd_pure 0
% 1.73/26.14 % fd_pseudo 0
% 1.73/26.14 % fd_cond 0
% 1.73/26.14 % fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 1.73/26.14 % AC symbols 0
% 1.73/26.14
% 1.73/26.14 % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 1.73/26.14
% 1.73/26.14 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.73/26.14
% 1.73/26.14
% 1.73/26.14 % ------
% 1.73/26.14 % Current options:
% 1.73/26.14 % ------
% 1.73/26.14
% 1.73/26.14
% 1.73/26.14 %
% 1.73/26.14
% 1.73/26.14 % ------ Proving...
% 1.73/26.14 %
% 1.73/26.14
% 1.73/26.14 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.73/26.14
% 1.73/26.14 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.73/26.14
% 1.73/26.14
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------