↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : LCL239-10 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:39:51 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.28s 1.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.28s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   35 (  35 unt;   0 nHn;   4 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   35 (  34 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    9 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   2 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   65 (   7 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(axiom_1_5,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(X1,or(X2,X3)),or(X2,or(X1,X3)))) = true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_1_5) ).

cnf(implies_definition,axiom,
    implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',implies_definition) ).

cnf(rule_2,axiom,
    ifeq(theorem(implies(X1,X2)),true,ifeq(theorem(X1),true,theorem(X2),true),true) = true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_2) ).

cnf(rule_1,axiom,
    ifeq(axiom(X1),true,theorem(X1),true) = true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_1) ).

cnf(ifeq_axiom,axiom,
    ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ifeq_axiom) ).

cnf(axiom_1_3,axiom,
    axiom(implies(X1,or(X2,X1))) = true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_1_3) ).

cnf(axiom_1_4,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(X1,X2),or(X2,X1))) = true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_1_4) ).

cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
    theorem(not(and(p,not(p)))) != true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

cnf(and_defn,axiom,
    and(X1,X2) = not(or(not(X1),not(X2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',and_defn) ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(X1,or(X2,X3)),or(X2,or(X1,X3)))) = true,
    axiom_1_5 ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2),
    implies_definition ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    ifeq(theorem(implies(X1,X2)),true,ifeq(theorem(X1),true,theorem(X2),true),true) = true,
    rule_2 ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    ifeq(axiom(X1),true,theorem(X1),true) = true,
    rule_1 ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    axiom(or(not(or(X1,or(X2,X3))),or(X2,or(X1,X3)))) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
    ifeq_axiom ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    axiom(implies(X1,or(X2,X1))) = true,
    axiom_1_3 ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(X1,X2),or(X2,X1))) = true,
    axiom_1_4 ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ifeq(theorem(or(not(X1),X2)),true,ifeq(theorem(X1),true,theorem(X2),true),true) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    theorem(or(not(or(X1,or(X2,X3))),or(X2,or(X1,X3)))) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    axiom(or(not(X1),or(X2,X1))) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    axiom(or(not(or(X1,X2)),or(X2,X1))) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ifeq(theorem(or(X1,or(X2,X3))),true,theorem(or(X2,or(X1,X3))),true) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    theorem(or(not(X1),or(X2,X1))) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_19]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    theorem(or(not(or(X1,X2)),or(X2,X1))) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_20]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ifeq(theorem(or(not(or(not(or(X1,or(X2,X3))),or(X2,or(X1,X3)))),X4)),true,theorem(X4),true) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    theorem(or(X1,or(not(X2),X2))) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ifeq(theorem(or(X1,X2)),true,theorem(or(X2,X1)),true) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_23]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    theorem(or(not(X1),X1)) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    theorem(or(X1,not(X1))) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    theorem(not(and(p,not(p)))) != true,
    prove_this ).

cnf(c_0_30,axiom,
    and(X1,X2) = not(or(not(X1),not(X2))),
    and_defn ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ifeq(theorem(X1),true,theorem(not(not(X1))),true) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_28]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    theorem(not(not(or(not(p),not(not(p)))))) != true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    theorem(not(not(or(X1,not(X1))))) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_28]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : LCL239-10 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.33  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 22:15:20 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.28/1.72  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.28/1.72  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.28/1.72  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.28/1.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.28/1.72  % Total time : 1.372s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------