↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : LCL240-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:06:08 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 7.77s 2.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.77s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   65 (  47 unt;   6 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  134 (   8 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   51 (  28   ~;  23   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   10 (   8 usr;   7 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   86 (   0 sgn  86   !;   0   ?;  55   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0] : axiom(implies(or(X0,X0),X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_2) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : axiom(implies(X0,or(X1,X0))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_3) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : axiom(implies(or(X0,X1),or(X1,X0))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_4) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : axiom(implies(or(X0,or(X1,X2)),or(X1,or(X0,X2)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_5) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : axiom(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(or(X2,X0),or(X2,X1)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_6) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : implies(X0,X1) = or(not(X0),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',implies_definition) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ axiom(X0)
      | theorem(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',rule_1) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ theorem(X1)
      | ~ theorem(implies(X1,X0))
      | theorem(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',rule_2) ).

fof(f9,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : and(X0,X1) = not(or(not(X0),not(X1))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-1.ax',and_defn) ).

fof(f10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(implies(and(p,q),p)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ! [X0] : axiom(or(not(or(X0,X0)),X0)),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f1,f6]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : axiom(or(not(X0),or(X1,X0))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f2,f6]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : axiom(or(not(or(X0,X1)),or(X1,X0))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f3,f6]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : axiom(or(not(or(X0,or(X1,X2))),or(X1,or(X0,X2)))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f4,f6]) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : axiom(or(not(or(not(X0),X1)),or(not(or(X2,X0)),or(X2,X1)))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f5,f6,f6,f6]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ theorem(X1)
      | ~ theorem(or(not(X1),X0))
      | theorem(X0) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f8,f6]) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    ~ theorem(or(not(not(or(not(p),not(q)))),p)),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f10,f6,f9]) ).

tcf(c_59,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : axiom(or(not(or(X0,X0)),X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

tcf(c_60,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : axiom(or(not(X0),or(X1,X0))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

tcf(c_61,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : axiom(or(not(or(X0,X1)),or(X1,X0))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

tcf(c_62,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : axiom(or(not(or(X0,or(X1,X2))),or(X1,or(X0,X2)))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

tcf(c_63,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : axiom(or(not(or(not(X0),X1)),or(not(or(X2,X0)),or(X2,X1)))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

tcf(c_64,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( theorem(X0)
      | ~ axiom(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tcf(c_65,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( theorem(X1)
      | ~ theorem(X0)
      | ~ theorem(or(not(X0),X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

tcf(c_66,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(or(not(not(or(not(p),not(q)))),p)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

tcf(c_95,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : theorem(or(not(or(X0,X0)),X0)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_59]) ).

tcf(c_100,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : theorem(or(not(X0),or(X1,X0))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_60]) ).

tcf(c_105,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : theorem(or(not(or(X0,X1)),or(X1,X0))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_61]) ).

tcf(c_110,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : theorem(or(not(or(X0,or(X1,X2))),or(X1,or(X0,X2)))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_62]) ).

tcf(c_115,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : theorem(or(not(or(not(X0),X1)),or(not(or(X2,X0)),or(X2,X1)))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_63]) ).

tcf(c_143,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = not(p),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_144,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = not(q),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_145,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = or(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_146,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = not(iPr_def_12),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_147,definition,
    iPr_def_14 = not(iPr_def_13),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).

tcf(c_148,definition,
    iPr_def_15 = or(iPr_def_14,p),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_15])],[]) ).

tcf(c_149,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(iPr_def_15),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_66,c_144,c_143,c_145,c_146,c_147,c_148]) ).

tcf(c_270,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : theorem(or(iPr_def_10,or(X0,p))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_143,c_100]) ).

tcf(c_273,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : theorem(or(iPr_def_14,or(X0,iPr_def_13))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_147,c_100]) ).

tcf(c_284,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( theorem(X0)
      | ~ theorem(or(X0,X0)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_95,c_65]) ).

tcf(c_285,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( theorem(or(X1,X0))
      | ~ theorem(X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_100,c_65]) ).

tcf(c_334,plain,
    theorem(or(not(or(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_10)),iPr_def_12)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_145,c_105]) ).

tcf(c_335,plain,
    theorem(or(not(or(p,iPr_def_14)),iPr_def_15)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_148,c_105]) ).

tcf(c_336,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( theorem(or(X1,X0))
      | ~ theorem(or(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_105,c_65]) ).

tcf(c_348,plain,
    ( theorem(iPr_def_15)
    | ~ theorem(or(p,iPr_def_14)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_335,c_65]) ).

tcf(c_349,plain,
    ~ theorem(or(p,iPr_def_14)),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_348,c_149]) ).

tcf(c_356,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( theorem(or(X1,or(X0,X2)))
      | ~ theorem(or(X0,or(X1,X2))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_110,c_65]) ).

tcf(c_502,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : theorem(or(not(or(iPr_def_13,X0)),or(not(or(X1,iPr_def_12)),or(X1,X0)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_146,c_115]) ).

tcf(c_508,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( theorem(or(not(or(X2,X0)),or(X2,X1)))
      | ~ theorem(or(not(X0),X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_115,c_65]) ).

tcf(c_816,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : theorem(or(X0,or(iPr_def_10,p))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_270,c_356]) ).

tcf(c_819,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : theorem(or(X0,or(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_13))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_273,c_356]) ).

tcf(c_820,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( theorem(or(X0,or(X2,X1)))
      | ~ theorem(or(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_285,c_356]) ).

tcf(c_967,plain,
    theorem(or(iPr_def_10,p)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_816,c_284]) ).

tcf(c_975,plain,
    theorem(or(p,iPr_def_10)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_967,c_336]) ).

tcf(c_1006,plain,
    theorem(or(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_13)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_819,c_284]) ).

tcf(c_1058,plain,
    theorem(or(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_14)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1006,c_336]) ).

tcf(c_1544,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( theorem(or(not(or(X1,iPr_def_12)),or(X1,X0)))
      | ~ theorem(or(iPr_def_13,X0)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_502,c_65]) ).

tcf(c_2057,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( theorem(or(X2,X1))
      | ~ theorem(or(X2,X0))
      | ~ theorem(or(not(X0),X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_508,c_65]) ).

tcf(c_2580,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( theorem(or(X0,X1))
      | ~ theorem(or(iPr_def_13,X1))
      | ~ theorem(or(X0,iPr_def_12)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1544,c_65]) ).

tcf(c_3303,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( theorem(or(X0,iPr_def_12))
      | ~ theorem(or(X0,or(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_10))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_334,c_2057]) ).

tcf(c_14828,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( theorem(or(X0,iPr_def_12))
      | ~ theorem(or(X0,iPr_def_10)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_820,c_3303]) ).

tcf(c_15107,plain,
    theorem(or(p,iPr_def_12)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_975,c_14828]) ).

tcf(c_15280,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( theorem(or(p,X0))
      | ~ theorem(or(iPr_def_13,X0)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_15107,c_2580]) ).

tcf(c_16746,plain,
    theorem(or(p,iPr_def_14)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1058,c_15280]) ).

tcf(c_16795,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_16746,c_349]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL240-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 22:32:21 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.41  
% 0.10/0.41  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.10/0.41  
% 0.10/0.41  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.10/0.43  % Proving...
% 7.77/2.28  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 7.77/2.28  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 7.77/2.28  
% 7.77/2.28  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 7.77/2.28  
% 7.77/2.28  % ------  iProver source info
% 7.77/2.28  
% 7.77/2.28  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 7.77/2.28  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 7.77/2.28  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 7.77/2.28  
% 7.77/2.28  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 7.77/2.28  
% 7.77/2.28  
% 7.77/2.28  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 7.77/2.28  
% 7.77/2.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 7.77/2.28  
% 7.77/2.28  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 7.77/2.28  
% 7.77/2.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 7.77/2.28  % ------ Proving...
% 7.77/2.28  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 7.77/2.28  
% 7.77/2.28  % 
% 7.77/2.28  % clauses                               13
% 7.77/2.28  % conjectures                           1
% 7.77/2.28  % EPR                                   1
% 7.77/2.28  % Horn                                  13
% 7.77/2.28  % unary                                 12
% 7.77/2.28  % binary                                0
% 7.77/2.28  % lits                                  15
% 7.77/2.28  % lits eq                               6
% 7.77/2.28  % fd_pure                               0
% 7.77/2.28  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 7.77/2.28  % fd_cond                               0
% 7.77/2.28  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 7.77/2.28  % AC symbols                            0
% 7.77/2.28  
% 7.77/2.28  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 7.77/2.28  
% 7.77/2.28  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 7.77/2.28  
% 7.77/2.28  
% 7.77/2.28  % ------ 
% 7.77/2.28  % Current options:
% 7.77/2.28  % ------ 
% 7.77/2.28  
% 7.77/2.28  
% 7.77/2.28  % 
% 7.77/2.28  
% 7.77/2.28  % ------ Proving...
% 7.77/2.28  % 
% 7.77/2.28  
% 7.77/2.28  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 7.77/2.28  
% 7.77/2.28  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 7.77/2.28  
% 7.77/2.28  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------