↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : LCL249-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:51:21 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 56.82s 12.28s
% Output   : Refutation 47.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   19
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :  107 (  47 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  282 (  57 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives : 1524 ( 146   ~;  91   |;   0   &;1287   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   8 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   10 (   7 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  211 (   0   ^; 211   !;   0   ?; 211   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(theorem_decl,type,
    theorem: $i > $o ).

thf(or_decl,type,
    or: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(not_decl,type,
    not: $i > $i ).

thf(p_decl,type,
    p: $i ).

thf(r_decl,type,
    r: $i ).

thf(q_decl,type,
    q: $i ).

thf(axiom_decl,type,
    axiom: $i > $o ).

thf(1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( r @ ( q @ not @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ not @ or ) @ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ~ ( r @ ( q @ not @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ not @ or ) @ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_1_4) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( B @ theorem )
      | ~ ( A @ ( B @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
      | ( A @ theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_2) ).

thf(19,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( B @ theorem )
      | ~ ( A @ ( B @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
      | ( A @ theorem ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(20,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( B @ theorem )
      | ~ ( A @ ( B @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
      | ( A @ theorem ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[19]) ).

thf(2,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_1_2) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ axiom )
      | ( A @ theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_1) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ axiom )
      | ( A @ theorem ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(18,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ axiom )
      | ( A @ theorem ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[17]) ).

thf(116,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
       != ( B @ axiom ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ( B @ theorem ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[12,18]) ).

thf(117,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
       != ( B @ axiom ) )
      | ( B @ theorem ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[116]) ).

thf(118,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[117:[bind(A,$thf( D )),bind(B,$thf( D @ ( D @ ( D @ or ) @ not @ or ) ))]]) ).

thf(124,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[118]) ).

thf(23,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
       != ( C @ ( D @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) )
      | ~ ( D @ theorem )
      | ~ $true
      | ( C @ theorem ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[14,20]) ).

thf(24,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
       != ( C @ ( D @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) )
      | ~ ( D @ theorem )
      | ( C @ theorem ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[23]) ).

thf(25,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ theorem )
      | ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ theorem ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[24:[bind(A,$thf( H )),bind(B,$thf( G )),bind(C,$thf( H @ ( G @ or ) )),bind(D,$thf( G @ ( H @ or ) ))]]) ).

thf(32,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ theorem )
      | ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ theorem ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[25]) ).

thf(194,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
       != ( B @ ( C @ or ) @ theorem ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ( C @ ( B @ or ) @ theorem ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[124,32]) ).

thf(195,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
       != ( B @ ( C @ or ) @ theorem ) )
      | ( C @ ( B @ or ) @ theorem ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[194]) ).

thf(196,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ ( A @ or ) @ theorem ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[195:[bind(A,$thf( F )),bind(B,$thf( F )),bind(C,$thf( F @ ( F @ or ) @ not ))]]) ).

thf(224,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ ( A @ or ) @ theorem ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[196]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ axiom ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_1_3) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ axiom ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( B @ ( C @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
      | ~ ( C @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
      | ( B @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_3) ).

thf(21,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( B @ ( C @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
      | ~ ( C @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
      | ( B @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(22,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( B @ ( C @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
      | ~ ( C @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
      | ( B @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[21]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ~ ( r @ ( q @ not @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ not @ or ) @ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ),
    inference(polarity_switch,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(26,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
       != ( C @ ( D @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) )
      | ~ ( D @ theorem )
      | ~ $true
      | ( C @ theorem ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[13,20]) ).

thf(27,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
       != ( C @ ( D @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) )
      | ~ ( D @ theorem )
      | ( C @ theorem ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[26]) ).

thf(28,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( B @ theorem )
      | ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ theorem ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[27:[bind(A,$thf( F )),bind(B,$thf( E )),bind(C,$thf( F @ ( E @ or ) )),bind(D,$thf( F ))]]) ).

thf(33,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( B @ theorem )
      | ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ theorem ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[28]) ).

thf(399,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ theorem )
       != ( r @ ( q @ not @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ not @ or ) @ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ~ ( B @ theorem ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[33,11]) ).

thf(400,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ theorem )
       != ( r @ ( q @ not @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ not @ or ) @ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) )
      | ~ ( B @ theorem ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[399]) ).

thf(401,plain,
    ~ ( r @ ( q @ not @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ not @ or ) @ theorem ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[400:[bind(A,$thf( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not )),bind(B,$thf( r @ ( q @ not @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ not @ or ) ))]]) ).

thf(110,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
       != ( C @ axiom ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ( C @ theorem ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[13,18]) ).

thf(111,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
       != ( C @ axiom ) )
      | ( C @ theorem ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[110]) ).

thf(112,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ ( B @ not @ or ) @ theorem ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[111:[bind(A,$thf( H )),bind(B,$thf( G )),bind(C,$thf( H @ ( G @ or ) @ ( H @ not @ or ) ))]]) ).

thf(122,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ ( B @ not @ or ) @ theorem ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[112]) ).

thf(50,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
       != ( r @ ( q @ not @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ not @ or ) @ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ~ ( B @ ( C @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
      | ~ ( C @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[22,11]) ).

thf(51,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
       != ( r @ ( q @ not @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ not @ or ) @ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) )
      | ~ ( B @ ( C @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
      | ~ ( C @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[50]) ).

thf(52,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( r @ ( q @ not @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ not @ or ) @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
      | ~ ( A @ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[51:[bind(A,$thf( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) )),bind(B,$thf( r @ ( q @ not @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ not @ or ) )),bind(C,$thf( C ))]]) ).

thf(54,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( r @ ( q @ not @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ not @ or ) @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
      | ~ ( A @ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[52]) ).

thf(135,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ ( B @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
       != ( r @ ( q @ not @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ not @ or ) @ ( C @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ~ ( C @ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[122,54]) ).

thf(136,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ ( B @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
       != ( r @ ( q @ not @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ not @ or ) @ ( C @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[135]) ).

thf(137,plain,
    ~ ( r @ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[136:[bind(A,$thf( q @ not @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ not )),bind(B,$thf( r )),bind(C,$thf( r ))]]) ).

thf(156,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
       != ( r @ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[12,137]) ).

thf(157,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
     != ( r @ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[156]) ).

thf(161,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( A @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) )
     != ( r @ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[157]) ).

thf(347,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A != r )
      | ( ( A @ ( A @ or ) @ not )
       != ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[161]) ).

thf(348,plain,
    ( ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not )
   != ( r @ ( r @ or ) @ not ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[347]) ).

thf(378,plain,
    ( ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) )
   != ( r @ ( r @ or ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[348]) ).

thf(107,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
       != ( C @ axiom ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ( C @ theorem ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[14,18]) ).

thf(108,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
       != ( C @ axiom ) )
      | ( C @ theorem ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[107]) ).

thf(109,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[108:[bind(A,$thf( J )),bind(B,$thf( I )),bind(C,$thf( J @ ( I @ or ) @ ( I @ ( J @ or ) @ not @ or ) ))]]) ).

thf(126,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[109]) ).

thf(69,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
       != ( C @ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) )
      | ~ ( r @ ( q @ not @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ not @ or ) @ ( C @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[13,54]) ).

thf(70,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
       != ( C @ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) )
      | ~ ( r @ ( q @ not @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ not @ or ) @ ( C @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[69]) ).

thf(71,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( r @ ( q @ not @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ not @ or ) @ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[70:[bind(A,$thf( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) )),bind(B,$thf( G )),bind(C,$thf( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( G @ or ) ))]]) ).

thf(81,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( r @ ( q @ not @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ not @ or ) @ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[71]) ).

thf(214,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ theorem )
       != ( r @ ( q @ not @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ not @ or ) @ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( C @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ~ ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ theorem ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[32,81]) ).

thf(215,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ theorem )
       != ( r @ ( q @ not @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ not @ or ) @ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( C @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) )
      | ~ ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ theorem ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[214]) ).

thf(216,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ not @ or ) @ or ) @ theorem ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[215:[bind(A,$thf( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( E @ or ) @ not )),bind(B,$thf( r @ ( q @ not @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ not @ or ) )),bind(C,$thf( E ))]]) ).

thf(226,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ not @ or ) @ or ) @ theorem ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[216]) ).

thf(429,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ theorem )
       != ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( C @ or ) @ not @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ not @ or ) @ or ) @ theorem ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ~ ( B @ theorem ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[33,226]) ).

thf(430,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ theorem )
       != ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( C @ or ) @ not @ ( r @ ( q @ not @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ not @ or ) @ or ) @ theorem ) )
      | ~ ( B @ theorem ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[429]) ).

thf(431,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ theorem ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[430:[bind(A,$thf( r @ ( q @ not @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ not @ or ) )),bind(B,$thf( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( M @ or ) @ not )),bind(C,$thf( M ))]]) ).

thf(443,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ theorem ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[431]) ).

thf(286,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
       != ( C @ ( D @ or ) @ theorem ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ( D @ ( C @ or ) @ theorem ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[126,32]) ).

thf(287,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
       != ( C @ ( D @ or ) @ theorem ) )
      | ( D @ ( C @ or ) @ theorem ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[286]) ).

thf(288,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ not @ ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ or ) @ theorem ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[287:[bind(A,$thf( H )),bind(B,$thf( I )),bind(C,$thf( I @ ( H @ or ) )),bind(D,$thf( H @ ( I @ or ) @ not ))]]) ).

thf(307,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ not @ ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ or ) @ theorem ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[288]) ).

thf(379,plain,
    ( ( r != r )
    | ( ( p @ not )
     != r ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[378]) ).

thf(380,plain,
    ( ( p @ not )
   != r ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[379]) ).

thf(152,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
       != ( r @ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[13,137]) ).

thf(153,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
     != ( r @ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[152]) ).

thf(160,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ ( A @ not @ or ) )
     != ( r @ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[153]) ).

thf(165,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( B @ or ) )
       != r )
      | ( ( A @ not )
       != ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[160]) ).

thf(294,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
       != ( r @ ( q @ not @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ not @ or ) @ ( C @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ~ ( C @ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[126,54]) ).

thf(295,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
       != ( r @ ( q @ not @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ not @ or ) @ ( C @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[294]) ).

thf(296,plain,
    ~ ( q @ not @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ not @ ( r @ or ) @ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[295:[bind(A,$thf( q @ not @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ not )),bind(B,$thf( r )),bind(C,$thf( q @ not @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ not @ ( r @ or ) ))]]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] : ( B @ ( C @ or ) @ ( A @ ( C @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( B @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_1_6) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] : ( B @ ( C @ or ) @ ( A @ ( C @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( B @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(93,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( C @ or ) @ ( A @ ( C @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( B @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
       != ( D @ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) )
      | ~ ( r @ ( q @ not @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ not @ or ) @ ( D @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[16,54]) ).

thf(94,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( C @ or ) @ ( A @ ( C @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ ( B @ ( A @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
       != ( D @ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) )
      | ~ ( r @ ( q @ not @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ not @ or ) @ ( D @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[93]) ).

thf(95,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( r @ ( q @ not @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ not @ or ) @ ( r @ ( A @ or ) @ ( p @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[94:[bind(A,$thf( p )),bind(B,$thf( r )),bind(C,$thf( J )),bind(D,$thf( r @ ( J @ or ) @ ( p @ ( J @ or ) @ not @ or ) ))]]) ).

thf(98,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( r @ ( q @ not @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ not @ or ) @ ( r @ ( A @ or ) @ ( p @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[95]) ).

thf(208,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ ( B @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
       != ( C @ ( D @ or ) @ theorem ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ( D @ ( C @ or ) @ theorem ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[122,32]) ).

thf(209,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ ( B @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
       != ( C @ ( D @ or ) @ theorem ) )
      | ( D @ ( C @ or ) @ theorem ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[208]) ).

thf(210,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( B @ not @ ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ or ) @ theorem ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[209:[bind(A,$thf( F )),bind(B,$thf( G )),bind(C,$thf( G @ ( F @ or ) )),bind(D,$thf( G @ not ))]]) ).

thf(223,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( B @ not @ ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ or ) @ theorem ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[210]) ).

thf(461,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ theorem )
       != ( r @ ( q @ not @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ~ ( B @ theorem ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[33,401]) ).

thf(462,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ theorem )
       != ( r @ ( q @ not @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) )
      | ~ ( B @ theorem ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[461]) ).

thf(463,plain,
    ~ ( r @ theorem ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[462:[bind(A,$thf( q @ not @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ not )),bind(B,$thf( r ))]]) ).

thf(189,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( B @ or ) )
       != r )
      | ( A
       != ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[165]) ).

thf(190,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ ( A @ or ) )
     != r ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[189]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] : ( C @ ( A @ or ) @ ( B @ or ) @ ( C @ ( B @ or ) @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_1_5) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] : ( C @ ( A @ or ) @ ( B @ or ) @ ( C @ ( B @ or ) @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(66,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
       != ( C @ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) )
      | ~ ( r @ ( q @ not @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ not @ or ) @ ( C @ not @ or ) @ theorem )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[14,54]) ).

thf(67,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( B @ or ) @ ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom )
       != ( C @ ( r @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ axiom ) )
      | ~ ( r @ ( q @ not @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ not @ or ) @ ( C @ not @ or ) @ theorem ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[66]) ).

thf(68,plain,
    ~ ( r @ ( q @ not @ ( p @ not @ or ) @ not @ not @ or ) @ ( p @ not @ ( r @ or ) @ not @ or ) @ theorem ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[67:[bind(A,$thf( p @ not )),bind(B,$thf( r )),bind(C,$thf( p @ not @ ( r @ or ) ))]]) ).

thf(488,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ theorem )
       != ( r @ theorem ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ~ ( B @ theorem ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[33,463]) ).

thf(489,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) @ theorem )
       != ( r @ theorem ) )
      | ~ ( B @ theorem ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[488]) ).

thf(496,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ or ) )
       != r )
      | ~ ( B @ theorem ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[489]) ).

thf(14768,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[10,14,20,224,124,13,22,18,11,401,378,126,443,348,307,380,160,165,33,21,137,32,161,296,17,12,54,81,98,223,226,16,463,190,19,15,68,122,496]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL249-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.3.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.13/0.38  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.38  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 22:06:51 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.39  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.86/0.97  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.27/1.18  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (207ms). 
% 1.27/1.19  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.99/1.59  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.99/1.59  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.18/1.69  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 8 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.35/1.72  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 8 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.35/1.74  % [INFO] 	 Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF). 
% 2.35/1.74  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.35/1.75  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 56.82/12.28  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 56.82/12.28  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 56.82/12.28  % Time passed: 11755ms (effective reasoning time: 11082ms)
% 56.82/12.28  % Axioms used in derivation (8): axiom_1_5, axiom_1_4, rule_1, axiom_1_3, rule_3, axiom_1_2, rule_2, axiom_1_6
% 56.82/12.28  % No. of inferences in proof: 107
% 56.82/12.28  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 11755 ms resp. 11082 ms w/o parsing
% 47.18/12.32  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 47.18/12.32  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------