↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : LCL253-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:06:11 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 120.41s 21.81s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 120.41s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   22
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   70 (  51 unt;  12 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  177 (  14 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   63 (  36   ~;  27   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   16 (  14 usr;  13 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   89 (   0 sgn  89   !;   0   ?;  58   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0] : axiom(implies(or(X0,X0),X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_2) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : axiom(implies(X0,or(X1,X0))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_3) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : axiom(implies(or(X0,X1),or(X1,X0))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_4) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : axiom(implies(or(X0,or(X1,X2)),or(X1,or(X0,X2)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_5) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : axiom(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(or(X2,X0),or(X2,X1)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_6) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : implies(X0,X1) = or(not(X0),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',implies_definition) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ axiom(X0)
      | theorem(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',rule_1) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ theorem(X1)
      | ~ theorem(implies(X1,X0))
      | theorem(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',rule_2) ).

fof(f9,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : and(X0,X1) = not(or(not(X0),not(X1))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-1.ax',and_defn) ).

fof(f10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(implies(implies(p,q),implies(and(p,r),and(q,r)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ! [X0] : axiom(or(not(or(X0,X0)),X0)),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f1,f6]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : axiom(or(not(X0),or(X1,X0))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f2,f6]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : axiom(or(not(or(X0,X1)),or(X1,X0))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f3,f6]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : axiom(or(not(or(X0,or(X1,X2))),or(X1,or(X0,X2)))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f4,f6]) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : axiom(or(not(or(not(X0),X1)),or(not(or(X2,X0)),or(X2,X1)))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f5,f6,f6,f6]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ theorem(X1)
      | ~ theorem(or(not(X1),X0))
      | theorem(X0) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f8,f6]) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    ~ theorem(or(not(or(not(p),q)),or(not(not(or(not(p),not(r)))),not(or(not(q),not(r)))))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f10,f6,f6,f6,f9,f9]) ).

tcf(c_59,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : axiom(or(not(or(X0,X0)),X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

tcf(c_60,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : axiom(or(not(X0),or(X1,X0))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

tcf(c_61,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : axiom(or(not(or(X0,X1)),or(X1,X0))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

tcf(c_62,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : axiom(or(not(or(X0,or(X1,X2))),or(X1,or(X0,X2)))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

tcf(c_63,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : axiom(or(not(or(not(X0),X1)),or(not(or(X2,X0)),or(X2,X1)))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

tcf(c_64,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( theorem(X0)
      | ~ axiom(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tcf(c_65,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( theorem(X1)
      | ~ theorem(X0)
      | ~ theorem(or(not(X0),X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

tcf(c_66,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(or(not(or(not(p),q)),or(not(not(or(not(p),not(r)))),not(or(not(q),not(r)))))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

tcf(c_95,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : theorem(or(not(or(X0,X0)),X0)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_59]) ).

tcf(c_100,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : theorem(or(not(X0),or(X1,X0))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_60]) ).

tcf(c_105,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : theorem(or(not(or(X0,X1)),or(X1,X0))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_61]) ).

tcf(c_110,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : theorem(or(not(or(X0,or(X1,X2))),or(X1,or(X0,X2)))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_62]) ).

tcf(c_115,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : theorem(or(not(or(not(X0),X1)),or(not(or(X2,X0)),or(X2,X1)))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_63]) ).

tcf(c_143,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = not(p),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_144,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = or(iPr_def_10,q),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_145,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = not(iPr_def_11),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_146,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = not(r),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_147,definition,
    iPr_def_14 = or(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_13),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).

tcf(c_148,definition,
    iPr_def_15 = not(iPr_def_14),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_15])],[]) ).

tcf(c_149,definition,
    iPr_def_16 = not(iPr_def_15),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_16])],[]) ).

tcf(c_150,definition,
    iPr_def_17 = not(q),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_17])],[]) ).

tcf(c_151,definition,
    iPr_def_18 = or(iPr_def_17,iPr_def_13),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_18])],[]) ).

tcf(c_152,definition,
    iPr_def_19 = not(iPr_def_18),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_19])],[]) ).

tcf(c_153,definition,
    iPr_def_20 = or(iPr_def_16,iPr_def_19),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_20])],[]) ).

tcf(c_154,definition,
    iPr_def_21 = or(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_20),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_21])],[]) ).

tcf(c_155,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(iPr_def_21),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_66,c_150,c_151,c_152,c_146,c_147,c_148,c_149,c_153,c_143,c_144,c_145,c_154]) ).

tcf(c_114856,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : theorem(or(iPr_def_16,or(X0,iPr_def_15))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_149,c_100]) ).

tcf(c_114872,plain,
    theorem(or(not(or(iPr_def_19,iPr_def_16)),iPr_def_20)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_153,c_105]) ).

tcf(c_114880,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( theorem(X0)
      | ~ theorem(or(X0,X0)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_95,c_65]) ).

tcf(c_114882,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( theorem(or(X1,X0))
      | ~ theorem(or(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_105,c_65]) ).

tcf(c_114938,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( theorem(or(X1,or(X0,X2)))
      | ~ theorem(or(X0,or(X1,X2))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_110,c_65]) ).

tcf(c_115064,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : theorem(or(not(or(iPr_def_15,X0)),or(not(or(X1,iPr_def_14)),or(X1,X0)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_148,c_115]) ).

tcf(c_115067,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : theorem(or(not(or(not(q),X0)),or(not(iPr_def_11),or(iPr_def_10,X0)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_144,c_115]) ).

tcf(c_115076,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : theorem(or(not(or(not(X0),iPr_def_20)),or(not(or(iPr_def_12,X0)),iPr_def_21))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_154,c_115]) ).

tcf(c_115077,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( theorem(or(not(or(X2,X0)),or(X2,X1)))
      | ~ theorem(or(not(X0),X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_115,c_65]) ).

tcf(c_115081,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : theorem(or(not(or(iPr_def_17,X0)),or(iPr_def_12,or(iPr_def_10,X0)))),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_115067,c_145,c_150]) ).

tcf(c_115534,plain,
    theorem(or(not(or(iPr_def_17,iPr_def_13)),or(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_14))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_147,c_115081]) ).

tcf(c_115537,plain,
    theorem(or(iPr_def_19,or(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_14))),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_115534,c_151,c_152]) ).

tcf(c_115575,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : theorem(or(X0,or(iPr_def_16,iPr_def_15))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_114856,c_114938]) ).

tcf(c_115605,plain,
    theorem(or(iPr_def_12,or(iPr_def_19,iPr_def_14))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_115537,c_114938]) ).

tcf(c_115906,plain,
    theorem(or(iPr_def_16,iPr_def_15)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_115575,c_114880]) ).

tcf(c_115912,plain,
    theorem(or(iPr_def_15,iPr_def_16)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_115906,c_114882]) ).

tcf(c_116694,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( theorem(or(not(or(X1,iPr_def_14)),or(X1,X0)))
      | ~ theorem(or(iPr_def_15,X0)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_115064,c_65]) ).

tcf(c_118312,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( theorem(or(not(or(iPr_def_12,X0)),iPr_def_21))
      | ~ theorem(or(not(X0),iPr_def_20)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_115076,c_65]) ).

tcf(c_118454,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( theorem(or(X2,or(not(or(X2,X0)),X1)))
      | ~ theorem(or(not(X0),X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_115077,c_114938]) ).

tcf(c_120972,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( theorem(iPr_def_21)
      | ~ theorem(or(iPr_def_12,X0))
      | ~ theorem(or(not(X0),iPr_def_20)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_118312,c_65]) ).

tcf(c_120976,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ theorem(or(iPr_def_12,X0))
      | ~ theorem(or(not(X0),iPr_def_20)) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_120972,c_155]) ).

tcf(c_192765,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( theorem(or(not(or(not(X2),X0)),X1))
      | ~ theorem(X2)
      | ~ theorem(or(not(X0),X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_118454,c_65]) ).

tcf(c_193253,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ theorem(X0)
      | ~ theorem(or(not(X1),iPr_def_20))
      | ~ theorem(or(iPr_def_12,or(not(X0),X1))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_192765,c_120976]) ).

tcf(c_194535,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ theorem(or(iPr_def_12,X0))
      | ~ theorem(or(not(X1),iPr_def_20))
      | ~ theorem(or(not(X0),X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_118454,c_193253]) ).

tcf(c_195510,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ theorem(or(iPr_def_15,X1))
      | ~ theorem(or(iPr_def_12,or(X0,iPr_def_14)))
      | ~ theorem(or(not(or(X0,X1)),iPr_def_20)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_116694,c_194535]) ).

tcf(c_236145,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(or(iPr_def_15,iPr_def_16))
    | ~ theorem(or(iPr_def_12,or(iPr_def_19,iPr_def_14))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_114872,c_195510]) ).

tcf(c_236224,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_236145,c_115912,c_115605]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : LCL253-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.15/0.41  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.41  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.41  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.41  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.15/0.41  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.15/0.41  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.41  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.41  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 22:36:41 UTC 2026
% 0.15/0.41  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.41  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.15/0.47  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.49  
% 0.15/0.49  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.15/0.49  
% 0.15/0.49  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.24/0.51  % Proving...
% 120.41/21.81  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 120.41/21.81  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 120.41/21.81  
% 120.41/21.81  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 120.41/21.81  
% 120.41/21.81  % ------  iProver source info
% 120.41/21.81  
% 120.41/21.81  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 120.41/21.81  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 120.41/21.81  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 120.41/21.81  
% 120.41/21.81  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 120.41/21.81  
% 120.41/21.81  
% 120.41/21.81  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 120.41/21.81  
% 120.41/21.81  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 120.41/21.81  
% 120.41/21.81  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 120.41/21.81  
% 120.41/21.81  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 120.41/21.81  % ------ Proving...
% 120.41/21.81  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 120.41/21.81  
% 120.41/21.81  % 
% 120.41/21.81  % clauses                               19
% 120.41/21.81  % conjectures                           1
% 120.41/21.81  % EPR                                   1
% 120.41/21.81  % Horn                                  19
% 120.41/21.81  % unary                                 18
% 120.41/21.81  % binary                                0
% 120.41/21.81  % lits                                  21
% 120.41/21.81  % lits eq                               12
% 120.41/21.81  % fd_pure                               0
% 120.41/21.81  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 120.41/21.81  % fd_cond                               0
% 120.41/21.81  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 120.41/21.81  % AC symbols                            0
% 120.41/21.81  
% 120.41/21.81  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 120.41/21.81  
% 120.41/21.81  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 120.41/21.81  
% 120.41/21.81  
% 120.41/21.81  % ------ 
% 120.41/21.81  % Current options:
% 120.41/21.81  % ------ 
% 120.41/21.81  
% 120.41/21.81  
% 120.41/21.81  % 
% 120.41/21.81  
% 120.41/21.81  % ------ Proving...
% 120.41/21.81  % Proof_search_loop: time out after: 5465 full_loop iterations
% 120.41/21.81  
% 120.41/21.81  % ------ Input Options"1. --res_lit_sel adaptive --res_lit_sel_side num_symb" Time Limit: 15.
% 120.41/21.81  
% 120.41/21.81  
% 120.41/21.81  % ------ 
% 120.41/21.81  % Current options:
% 120.41/21.81  % ------ 
% 120.41/21.81  
% 120.41/21.81  
% 120.41/21.81  % 
% 120.41/21.81  
% 120.41/21.81  % ------ Proving...
% 120.41/21.81  % 
% 120.41/21.81  
% 120.41/21.81  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 120.41/21.81  
% 120.41/21.81  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 120.41/21.81  
% 120.41/21.81  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------