↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : LCL271-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:12:19 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.07s 0.37s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.07s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   58 (  39 unt;   0 nHn;  20 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   83 (   7 equ;  30 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    9 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  103 (  11 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_2,axiom,
    ( ~ theorem(X2)
    | ~ theorem(implies(X2,X1))
    | theorem(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',rule_2) ).

cnf(implies_definition,axiom,
    implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',implies_definition) ).

cnf(rule_1,axiom,
    ( ~ axiom(X1)
    | theorem(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',rule_1) ).

cnf(axiom_1_4,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(X1,X2),or(X2,X1))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_4) ).

cnf(axiom_1_3,axiom,
    axiom(implies(X1,or(X2,X1))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_3) ).

cnf(axiom_1_5,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(X1,or(X2,X3)),or(X2,or(X1,X3)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_5) ).

cnf(axiom_1_2,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(X1,X1),X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_2) ).

cnf(axiom_1_6,axiom,
    axiom(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(or(X3,X1),or(X3,X2)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_6) ).

cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(equivalent(p,and(p,p))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

cnf(equivalent_defn,axiom,
    equivalent(X1,X2) = and(implies(X1,X2),implies(X2,X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-2.ax',equivalent_defn) ).

cnf(and_defn,axiom,
    and(X1,X2) = not(or(not(X1),not(X2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-1.ax',and_defn) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(X2)
    | ~ theorem(implies(X2,X1))
    | theorem(X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(X2)
    | ~ theorem(implies(X2,X1))
    | theorem(X1) ),
    c_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2),
    implies_definition ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ axiom(X1)
    | theorem(X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(or(not(X2),X1))
    | ~ theorem(X2)
    | theorem(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ axiom(X1)
    | theorem(X1) ),
    c_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(X1,X2),or(X2,X1))),
    axiom_1_4 ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ axiom(or(not(X2),X1))
    | ~ theorem(X2)
    | theorem(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    axiom(or(not(or(X1,X2)),or(X2,X1))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(or(X2,X1))
    | theorem(or(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
    axiom(implies(X1,or(X2,X1))),
    axiom_1_3 ).

cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(X1,or(X2,X3)),or(X2,or(X1,X3)))),
    axiom_1_5 ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ axiom(or(X2,X1))
    | theorem(or(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    axiom(or(not(X1),or(X2,X1))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(X1,X1),X1)),
    axiom_1_2 ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    axiom(or(not(or(X1,or(X2,X3))),or(X2,or(X1,X3)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    theorem(or(or(X1,X2),not(X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    axiom(or(not(or(X1,X1)),X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(or(X2,or(X1,X3)))
    | theorem(or(X1,or(X2,X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    theorem(or(not(X1),or(X2,X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(or(X1,X1))
    | theorem(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    theorem(or(X1,or(not(X2),X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,axiom,
    axiom(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(or(X3,X1),or(X3,X2)))),
    axiom_1_6 ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    theorem(or(not(X1),X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    axiom(or(not(or(not(X1),X2)),or(not(or(X3,X1)),or(X3,X2)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_13]),c_0_13]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    theorem(or(X1,or(not(or(X1,X2)),X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(or(not(X2),X3))
    | theorem(or(not(or(X1,X2)),or(X1,X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    theorem(or(X1,not(X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(X2)
    | theorem(or(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(equivalent(p,and(p,p))),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,axiom,
    equivalent(X1,X2) = and(implies(X1,X2),implies(X2,X1)),
    equivalent_defn ).

cnf(c_0_42,axiom,
    and(X1,X2) = not(or(not(X1),not(X2))),
    and_defn ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(X1)
    | theorem(or(not(or(not(X1),X2)),X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    theorem(or(not(or(X1,X2)),or(X1,not(not(X2))))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(or(X1,X3))
    | theorem(or(X1,or(X2,X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(equivalent(p,and(p,p))),
    c_0_40 ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    equivalent(X1,X2) = not(or(not(or(not(X1),X2)),not(or(not(X2),X1)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_13]),c_0_13]),c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(X2)
    | theorem(or(X1,not(or(not(X2),X1)))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(or(X1,X2))
    | theorem(or(X1,not(not(X2)))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    theorem(or(X1,or(X2,not(X1)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(not(or(not(or(not(p),not(or(not(p),not(p))))),not(or(not(not(or(not(p),not(p)))),p))))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_42]),c_0_47]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,plain,
    ( ~ theorem(X1)
    | ~ theorem(X2)
    | theorem(not(or(not(X1),not(X2)))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_48]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,plain,
    theorem(or(X1,not(or(X1,X1)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,plain,
    theorem(or(X1,not(not(or(X2,not(X1)))))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_50]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(or(not(not(or(not(p),not(p)))),p)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_52]),c_0_53])]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,plain,
    theorem(or(not(not(or(X1,not(X2)))),X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_54]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_56])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : LCL271-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.03/0.31  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.03/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.03/0.31  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.03/0.31  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.03/0.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.31  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.03/0.31  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 00:17:21 UTC 2026
% 0.03/0.31  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.03/0.31  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.33  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.07/0.33  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.37  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.07/0.37  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.07/0.37  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.07/0.37  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.07/0.37  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.37  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.37  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.37  % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 1212418 completed with status 0
% 0.07/0.37  % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.07/0.37  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.07/0.37  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.07/0.37  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.07/0.37  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.07/0.37  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.07/0.37  % Search class: FHUNM-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.07/0.37  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.07/0.37  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 151s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.37  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 395s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.37  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 334s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.37  % Starting new_bool_3 with 329s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.37  % Starting new_bool_1 with 291s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.37  % new_bool_3 with pid 1212428 completed with status 0
% 0.07/0.37  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.07/0.37  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.07/0.37  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.07/0.37  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.07/0.37  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.07/0.37  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.07/0.37  % Search class: FHUNM-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.07/0.37  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.07/0.37  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 151s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.37  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 395s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.37  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 334s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.37  % Starting new_bool_3 with 329s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.37  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.07/0.37  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.07/0.37  
% 0.07/0.37  % Proof found!
% 0.07/0.37  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.07/0.37  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.07/0.37  % Parsed axioms                        : 11
% 0.07/0.37  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.07/0.37  % Initial clauses                      : 11
% 0.07/0.37  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 3
% 0.07/0.37  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 8
% 0.07/0.37  % Processed clauses                    : 810
% 0.07/0.37  % ...of these trivial                  : 20
% 0.07/0.37  % ...subsumed                          : 442
% 0.07/0.37  % ...remaining for further processing  : 348
% 0.07/0.37  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.07/0.37  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.07/0.37  % Backward-subsumed                    : 4
% 0.07/0.37  % Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.07/0.37  % Generated clauses                    : 2973
% 0.07/0.37  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2669
% 0.07/0.37  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.07/0.37  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.07/0.37  % Paramodulations                      : 2973
% 0.07/0.37  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.07/0.37  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.07/0.37  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.07/0.37  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.07/0.37  % Total rewrite steps                  : 294
% 0.07/0.37  % ...of those cached                   : 183
% 0.07/0.37  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.07/0.37  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.07/0.37  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.07/0.37  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.07/0.37  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.07/0.37  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.07/0.37  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.07/0.37  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.07/0.37  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.07/0.37  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.07/0.37  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.07/0.37  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.07/0.37  % Current number of processed clauses  : 335
% 0.07/0.37  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 110
% 0.07/0.37  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.07/0.37  %    Negative unit clauses             : 11
% 0.07/0.37  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 214
% 0.07/0.37  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1875
% 0.07/0.37  % ...number of literals in the above   : 2709
% 0.07/0.37  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.07/0.37  % Current number of archived clauses   : 16
% 0.07/0.37  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5424
% 0.07/0.37  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5385
% 0.07/0.37  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 442
% 0.07/0.37  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 225
% 0.07/0.37  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.07/0.37  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 2364
% 0.07/0.37  % BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.07/0.37  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.07/0.37  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.07/0.37  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 36417
% 0.07/0.37  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 11
% 0.07/0.37  
% 0.07/0.37  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.07/0.37  % User time                : 0.030 s
% 0.07/0.37  % System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.07/0.37  % Total time               : 0.032 s
% 0.07/0.37  % Maximum resident set size: 3644 pages
% 0.07/0.37  
% 0.07/0.37  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.07/0.37  % User time                : 0.152 s
% 0.07/0.37  % System time              : 0.011 s
% 0.07/0.37  % Total time               : 0.163 s
% 0.07/0.37  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.07/0.37  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------