↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : LCL271-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:06:14 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 10.51s 12.51s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 10.51s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :   21
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   82 (  61 unt;  10 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  200 (  14 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   60 (  33   ~;  27   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    9 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   14 (  12 usr;  11 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   84 (   0 sgn  84   !;   0   ?;  49   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0] : axiom(implies(or(X0,X0),X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_2) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : axiom(implies(X0,or(X1,X0))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_3) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : axiom(implies(or(X0,X1),or(X1,X0))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_4) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : axiom(implies(or(X0,or(X1,X2)),or(X1,or(X0,X2)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_5) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : axiom(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(or(X2,X0),or(X2,X1)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_6) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : implies(X0,X1) = or(not(X0),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',implies_definition) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ axiom(X0)
      | theorem(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',rule_1) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ theorem(X1)
      | ~ theorem(implies(X1,X0))
      | theorem(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',rule_2) ).

fof(f9,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : and(X0,X1) = not(or(not(X0),not(X1))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-1.ax',and_defn) ).

fof(f10,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : equivalent(X0,X1) = and(implies(X0,X1),implies(X1,X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-2.ax',equivalent_defn) ).

fof(f11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(equivalent(p,and(p,p))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : equivalent(X0,X1) = not(or(not(or(not(X0),X1)),not(or(not(X1),X0)))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f10,f9,f6,f6]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ! [X0] : axiom(or(not(or(X0,X0)),X0)),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f1,f6]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : axiom(or(not(X0),or(X1,X0))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f2,f6]) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : axiom(or(not(or(X0,X1)),or(X1,X0))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f3,f6]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : axiom(or(not(or(X0,or(X1,X2))),or(X1,or(X0,X2)))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f4,f6]) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : axiom(or(not(or(not(X0),X1)),or(not(or(X2,X0)),or(X2,X1)))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f5,f6,f6,f6]) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ theorem(X1)
      | ~ theorem(or(not(X1),X0))
      | theorem(X0) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f8,f6]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ~ theorem(not(or(not(or(not(p),not(or(not(p),not(p))))),not(or(not(not(or(not(p),not(p)))),p))))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f11,f12,f9]) ).

tcf(c_60,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : axiom(or(not(or(X0,X0)),X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

tcf(c_61,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : axiom(or(not(X0),or(X1,X0))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

tcf(c_62,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : axiom(or(not(or(X0,X1)),or(X1,X0))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

tcf(c_63,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : axiom(or(not(or(X0,or(X1,X2))),or(X1,or(X0,X2)))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

tcf(c_64,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : axiom(or(not(or(not(X0),X1)),or(not(or(X2,X0)),or(X2,X1)))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

tcf(c_65,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( theorem(X0)
      | ~ axiom(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tcf(c_66,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( theorem(X1)
      | ~ theorem(X0)
      | ~ theorem(or(not(X0),X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

tcf(c_67,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(not(or(not(or(not(p),not(or(not(p),not(p))))),not(or(not(not(or(not(p),not(p)))),p))))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

tcf(c_96,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : theorem(or(not(or(X0,X0)),X0)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_65,c_60]) ).

tcf(c_101,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : theorem(or(not(X0),or(X1,X0))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_65,c_61]) ).

tcf(c_106,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : theorem(or(not(or(X0,X1)),or(X1,X0))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_65,c_62]) ).

tcf(c_111,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : theorem(or(not(or(X0,or(X1,X2))),or(X1,or(X0,X2)))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_65,c_63]) ).

tcf(c_116,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : theorem(or(not(or(not(X0),X1)),or(not(or(X2,X0)),or(X2,X1)))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_65,c_64]) ).

tcf(c_144,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = not(p),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_145,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = or(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_10),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_146,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = not(iPr_def_11),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_147,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = or(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_148,definition,
    iPr_def_14 = not(iPr_def_13),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).

tcf(c_149,definition,
    iPr_def_15 = not(iPr_def_12),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_15])],[]) ).

tcf(c_150,definition,
    iPr_def_16 = or(iPr_def_15,p),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_16])],[]) ).

tcf(c_151,definition,
    iPr_def_17 = not(iPr_def_16),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_17])],[]) ).

tcf(c_152,definition,
    iPr_def_18 = or(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_17),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_18])],[]) ).

tcf(c_153,definition,
    iPr_def_19 = not(iPr_def_18),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_19])],[]) ).

tcf(c_154,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(iPr_def_19),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_67,c_149,c_150,c_151,c_145,c_146,c_144,c_147,c_148,c_152,c_153]) ).

tcf(c_291,plain,
    theorem(or(not(iPr_def_11),iPr_def_10)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_145,c_96]) ).

tcf(c_292,plain,
    theorem(or(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_10)),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_291,c_146]) ).

tcf(c_299,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( theorem(X0)
      | ~ theorem(iPr_def_13)
      | ~ theorem(or(iPr_def_14,X0)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_148,c_66]) ).

tcf(c_301,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( theorem(X0)
      | ~ theorem(iPr_def_16)
      | ~ theorem(or(iPr_def_17,X0)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_151,c_66]) ).

tcf(c_329,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : theorem(or(iPr_def_10,or(X0,p))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_144,c_101]) ).

tcf(c_332,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : theorem(or(iPr_def_15,or(X0,iPr_def_12))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_149,c_101]) ).

tcf(c_339,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( theorem(or(X1,X0))
      | ~ theorem(X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_101,c_66]) ).

tcf(c_370,plain,
    theorem(or(not(iPr_def_18),or(iPr_def_17,iPr_def_14))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_152,c_106]) ).

tcf(c_372,plain,
    theorem(or(not(or(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_10)),iPr_def_13)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_147,c_106]) ).

tcf(c_373,plain,
    theorem(or(not(or(p,iPr_def_15)),iPr_def_16)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_150,c_106]) ).

tcf(c_375,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( theorem(or(X1,X0))
      | ~ theorem(or(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_106,c_66]) ).

tcf(c_377,plain,
    theorem(or(iPr_def_19,or(iPr_def_17,iPr_def_14))),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_370,c_153]) ).

tcf(c_435,plain,
    ( theorem(iPr_def_13)
    | ~ theorem(or(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_10)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_372,c_66]) ).

tcf(c_436,plain,
    theorem(iPr_def_13),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_435,c_292]) ).

tcf(c_437,plain,
    ( theorem(iPr_def_16)
    | ~ theorem(or(p,iPr_def_15)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_373,c_66]) ).

tcf(c_454,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : theorem(or(not(or(iPr_def_10,or(X0,iPr_def_10))),or(X0,iPr_def_11))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_145,c_111]) ).

tcf(c_458,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( theorem(or(X1,or(X0,X2)))
      | ~ theorem(or(X0,or(X1,X2))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_111,c_66]) ).

tcf(c_637,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : theorem(or(not(or(iPr_def_12,X0)),or(not(or(X1,iPr_def_11)),or(X1,X0)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_146,c_116]) ).

tcf(c_742,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( theorem(X0)
      | ~ theorem(or(iPr_def_14,X0)) ),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_299,c_299,c_436]) ).

tcf(c_1259,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( theorem(or(X0,iPr_def_11))
      | ~ theorem(or(iPr_def_10,or(X0,iPr_def_10))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_454,c_66]) ).

tcf(c_1440,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : theorem(or(X0,or(iPr_def_10,p))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_329,c_458]) ).

tcf(c_1443,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : theorem(or(X0,or(iPr_def_15,iPr_def_12))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_332,c_458]) ).

tcf(c_1448,plain,
    theorem(or(iPr_def_17,or(iPr_def_19,iPr_def_14))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_377,c_458]) ).

tcf(c_1667,plain,
    theorem(or(iPr_def_10,p)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1440,c_742]) ).

tcf(c_1676,plain,
    theorem(or(p,iPr_def_10)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1667,c_375]) ).

tcf(c_1710,plain,
    theorem(or(iPr_def_15,iPr_def_12)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1443,c_742]) ).

tcf(c_1733,plain,
    theorem(or(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_15)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1710,c_375]) ).

tcf(c_1837,plain,
    ( theorem(or(iPr_def_19,iPr_def_14))
    | ~ theorem(iPr_def_16) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1448,c_301]) ).

tcf(c_1945,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( theorem(or(X0,iPr_def_11))
      | ~ theorem(or(X0,iPr_def_10)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_339,c_1259]) ).

tcf(c_2145,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( theorem(or(not(or(X1,iPr_def_11)),or(X1,X0)))
      | ~ theorem(or(iPr_def_12,X0)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_637,c_66]) ).

tcf(c_2270,plain,
    ( theorem(or(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_19))
    | ~ theorem(iPr_def_16) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1837,c_375]) ).

tcf(c_2445,plain,
    ( theorem(iPr_def_19)
    | ~ theorem(iPr_def_16) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2270,c_742]) ).

tcf(c_2447,plain,
    ~ theorem(iPr_def_16),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2445,c_154]) ).

tcf(c_2449,plain,
    ~ theorem(or(p,iPr_def_15)),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_437,c_2447]) ).

tcf(c_3488,plain,
    theorem(or(p,iPr_def_11)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1676,c_1945]) ).

tcf(c_4408,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( theorem(or(X0,X1))
      | ~ theorem(or(iPr_def_12,X1))
      | ~ theorem(or(X0,iPr_def_11)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2145,c_66]) ).

tcf(c_4692,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( theorem(or(p,X0))
      | ~ theorem(or(iPr_def_12,X0)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3488,c_4408]) ).

tcf(c_12555,plain,
    theorem(or(p,iPr_def_15)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1733,c_4692]) ).

tcf(c_12610,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_12555,c_2449]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : LCL271-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.08/10.55  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.08/10.55  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/10.55  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/10.55  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/10.55  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/10.55  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/10.55  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/10.55  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 22:40:40 UTC 2026
% 0.08/10.55  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/10.55  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/10.61  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/10.61  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/10.62  
% 0.13/10.62  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.13/10.62  
% 0.13/10.62  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.13/10.64  % Proving...
% 10.51/12.51  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 10.51/12.51  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 10.51/12.51  
% 10.51/12.51  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 10.51/12.51  
% 10.51/12.51  % ------  iProver source info
% 10.51/12.51  
% 10.51/12.51  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 10.51/12.51  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 10.51/12.51  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 10.51/12.51  
% 10.51/12.51  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 10.51/12.51  
% 10.51/12.51  
% 10.51/12.51  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 10.51/12.51  
% 10.51/12.51  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 10.51/12.51  
% 10.51/12.51  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 10.51/12.51  
% 10.51/12.51  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 10.51/12.51  % ------ Proving...
% 10.51/12.51  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 10.51/12.51  
% 10.51/12.51  % 
% 10.51/12.51  % clauses                               17
% 10.51/12.51  % conjectures                           1
% 10.51/12.51  % EPR                                   1
% 10.51/12.51  % Horn                                  17
% 10.51/12.51  % unary                                 16
% 10.51/12.51  % binary                                0
% 10.51/12.51  % lits                                  19
% 10.51/12.51  % lits eq                               10
% 10.51/12.51  % fd_pure                               0
% 10.51/12.51  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 10.51/12.51  % fd_cond                               0
% 10.51/12.51  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 10.51/12.51  % AC symbols                            0
% 10.51/12.51  
% 10.51/12.51  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 10.51/12.51  
% 10.51/12.51  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 10.51/12.51  
% 10.51/12.51  
% 10.51/12.51  % ------ 
% 10.51/12.51  % Current options:
% 10.51/12.51  % ------ 
% 10.51/12.51  
% 10.51/12.51  
% 10.51/12.51  % 
% 10.51/12.51  
% 10.51/12.51  % ------ Proving...
% 10.51/12.51  % 
% 10.51/12.51  
% 10.51/12.51  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 10.51/12.51  
% 10.51/12.51  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 10.51/12.51  
% 10.51/12.51  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------