%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : LCL311-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:12:24 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.26s 0.56s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 13
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 40 ( 25 unt; 0 nHn; 20 RR)
% Number of literals : 63 ( 7 equ; 29 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 66 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_2,axiom,
( ~ theorem(X2)
| ~ theorem(implies(X2,X1))
| theorem(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',rule_2) ).
cnf(implies_definition,axiom,
implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',implies_definition) ).
cnf(rule_1,axiom,
( ~ axiom(X1)
| theorem(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',rule_1) ).
cnf(axiom_1_5,axiom,
axiom(implies(or(X1,or(X2,X3)),or(X2,or(X1,X3)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_5) ).
cnf(axiom_1_4,axiom,
axiom(implies(or(X1,X2),or(X2,X1))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_4) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ theorem(equivalent(implies(p,not(p)),not(p))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(equivalent_defn,axiom,
equivalent(X1,X2) = and(implies(X1,X2),implies(X2,X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-2.ax',equivalent_defn) ).
cnf(and_defn,axiom,
and(X1,X2) = not(or(not(X1),not(X2))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-1.ax',and_defn) ).
cnf(axiom_1_2,axiom,
axiom(implies(or(X1,X1),X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_2) ).
cnf(axiom_1_3,axiom,
axiom(implies(X1,or(X2,X1))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_3) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ theorem(X2)
| ~ theorem(implies(X2,X1))
| theorem(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ theorem(X2)
| ~ theorem(implies(X2,X1))
| theorem(X1) ),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2),
implies_definition ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ axiom(X1)
| theorem(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ theorem(or(not(X2),X1))
| ~ theorem(X2)
| theorem(X1) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ axiom(X1)
| theorem(X1) ),
c_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
axiom(implies(or(X1,or(X2,X3)),or(X2,or(X1,X3)))),
axiom_1_5 ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ axiom(or(not(X2),X1))
| ~ theorem(X2)
| theorem(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
axiom(or(not(or(X1,or(X2,X3))),or(X2,or(X1,X3)))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ theorem(or(X2,or(X1,X3)))
| theorem(or(X1,or(X2,X3))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ axiom(or(X2,or(X1,X3)))
| theorem(or(X1,or(X2,X3))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
axiom(implies(or(X1,X2),or(X2,X1))),
axiom_1_4 ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ axiom(or(X1,or(not(X3),X2)))
| ~ theorem(X3)
| theorem(or(X1,X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
axiom(or(not(or(X1,X2)),or(X2,X1))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
~ theorem(equivalent(implies(p,not(p)),not(p))),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,axiom,
equivalent(X1,X2) = and(implies(X1,X2),implies(X2,X1)),
equivalent_defn ).
cnf(c_0_26,axiom,
and(X1,X2) = not(or(not(X1),not(X2))),
and_defn ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ theorem(X2)
| theorem(or(not(or(X1,not(X2))),X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
~ theorem(equivalent(implies(p,not(p)),not(p))),
c_0_24 ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
equivalent(X1,X2) = not(or(not(or(not(X1),X2)),not(or(not(X2),X1)))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_12]),c_0_12]),c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( ~ theorem(X2)
| ~ theorem(or(X1,not(X2)))
| theorem(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
~ theorem(not(or(not(or(not(or(not(p),not(p))),not(p))),not(or(not(not(p)),or(not(p),not(p))))))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_12]),c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( ~ theorem(X2)
| ~ theorem(X1)
| theorem(not(or(not(X1),not(X2)))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,axiom,
axiom(implies(or(X1,X1),X1)),
axiom_1_2 ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
( ~ theorem(or(not(not(p)),or(not(p),not(p))))
| ~ theorem(or(not(or(not(p),not(p))),not(p))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
axiom(or(not(or(X1,X1)),X1)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,axiom,
axiom(implies(X1,or(X2,X1))),
axiom_1_3 ).
cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
~ theorem(or(not(not(p)),or(not(p),not(p)))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_15]),c_0_35])]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
axiom(or(not(X1),or(X2,X1))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_15]),c_0_38])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : LCL311-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.41 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.41 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.41 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.41 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.41 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.41 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.41 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.18/0.41 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 00:19:42 UTC 2026
% 0.06/0.42 % CPUTime :
% 0.06/0.42 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.06/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.06/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/0.56 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.26/0.56 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.56 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.56 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.56 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.56 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.56 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.56 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 1618055 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.56 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.26/0.56 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.56 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.56 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.56 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.26/0.56 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.26/0.56 % Search class: FHUNM-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.56 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.26/0.56 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 151s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.56 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 395s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.56 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 334s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.56 % Starting new_bool_3 with 329s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.56 % Starting new_bool_1 with 291s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.56 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 1618060 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.56 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.26/0.56 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.56 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.56 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.56 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.26/0.56 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.26/0.56 % Search class: FHUNM-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.56 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.26/0.56 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 151s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.56 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 395s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.56 % Preprocessing time : 0.026 s
% 0.26/0.56
% 0.26/0.56 % Proof found!
% 0.26/0.56 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.26/0.56 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/0.56 % Parsed axioms : 11
% 0.26/0.56 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.26/0.56 % Initial clauses : 11
% 0.26/0.56 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 3
% 0.26/0.56 % Initial clauses in saturation : 8
% 0.26/0.56 % Processed clauses : 65
% 0.26/0.56 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.26/0.56 % ...subsumed : 23
% 0.26/0.56 % ...remaining for further processing : 42
% 0.26/0.56 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.26/0.56 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.26/0.56 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.26/0.56 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.26/0.56 % Generated clauses : 130
% 0.26/0.56 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 118
% 0.26/0.56 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.56 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.26/0.56 % Paramodulations : 130
% 0.26/0.56 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.26/0.56 % NegExts : 0
% 0.26/0.56 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.26/0.56 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.26/0.56 % Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.26/0.56 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.26/0.56 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.26/0.56 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.26/0.56 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.26/0.56 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.56 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.26/0.56 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.26/0.56 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.56 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.56 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.56 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.56 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.56 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.56 % Current number of processed clauses : 41
% 0.26/0.56 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 5
% 0.26/0.56 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.26/0.56 % Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.26/0.56 % Non-unit-clauses : 33
% 0.26/0.56 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 61
% 0.26/0.56 % ...number of literals in the above : 147
% 0.26/0.56 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.26/0.56 % Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.26/0.56 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 319
% 0.26/0.56 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 319
% 0.26/0.56 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 23
% 0.26/0.56 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.26/0.56 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.26/0.56 % BW rewrite match attempts : 7
% 0.26/0.56 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.26/0.56 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.26/0.56 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.26/0.56 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1896
% 0.26/0.56 % Search garbage collected termcells : 11
% 0.26/0.56
% 0.26/0.56 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.56 % User time : 0.026 s
% 0.26/0.56 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.26/0.56 % Total time : 0.035 s
% 0.26/0.56 % Maximum resident set size: 3644 pages
% 0.26/0.56
% 0.26/0.56 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.56 % User time : 0.079 s
% 0.26/0.56 % System time : 0.027 s
% 0.26/0.56 % Total time : 0.106 s
% 0.26/0.56 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.26/0.56 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------