↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : LCL323-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:06:20 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 6.88s 1.75s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 6.88s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   46 (  34 unt;   5 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   94 (   6 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   39 (  23   ~;  16   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   7 usr;   6 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   64 (   0 sgn  64   !;   0   ?;  37   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : axiom(implies(X0,or(X1,X0))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_3) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : axiom(implies(or(X0,X1),or(X1,X0))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_4) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : axiom(implies(or(X0,or(X1,X2)),or(X1,or(X0,X2)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_5) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : axiom(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(or(X2,X0),or(X2,X1)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_6) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : implies(X0,X1) = or(not(X0),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',implies_definition) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ axiom(X0)
      | theorem(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',rule_1) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ theorem(X1)
      | ~ theorem(implies(X1,X0))
      | theorem(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',rule_2) ).

fof(f9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(or(implies(p,q),implies(q,r))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : axiom(or(not(X0),or(X1,X0))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f2,f6]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : axiom(or(not(or(X0,X1)),or(X1,X0))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f3,f6]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : axiom(or(not(or(X0,or(X1,X2))),or(X1,or(X0,X2)))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f4,f6]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : axiom(or(not(or(not(X0),X1)),or(not(or(X2,X0)),or(X2,X1)))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f5,f6,f6,f6]) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ theorem(X1)
      | ~ theorem(or(not(X1),X0))
      | theorem(X0) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f8,f6]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ~ theorem(or(or(not(p),q),or(not(q),r))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f9,f6,f6]) ).

tcf(c_59,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : axiom(or(not(X0),or(X1,X0))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

tcf(c_60,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : axiom(or(not(or(X0,X1)),or(X1,X0))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

tcf(c_61,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : axiom(or(not(or(X0,or(X1,X2))),or(X1,or(X0,X2)))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

tcf(c_62,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : axiom(or(not(or(not(X0),X1)),or(not(or(X2,X0)),or(X2,X1)))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

tcf(c_63,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( theorem(X0)
      | ~ axiom(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tcf(c_64,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( theorem(X1)
      | ~ theorem(X0)
      | ~ theorem(or(not(X0),X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

tcf(c_65,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(or(or(not(p),q),or(not(q),r))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

tcf(c_99,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : theorem(or(not(X0),or(X1,X0))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_59]) ).

tcf(c_104,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : theorem(or(not(or(X0,X1)),or(X1,X0))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_60]) ).

tcf(c_109,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : theorem(or(not(or(X0,or(X1,X2))),or(X1,or(X0,X2)))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_61]) ).

tcf(c_114,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : theorem(or(not(or(not(X0),X1)),or(not(or(X2,X0)),or(X2,X1)))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_62]) ).

tcf(c_142,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = not(p),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_143,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = or(iPr_def_10,q),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_144,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = not(q),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_145,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = or(iPr_def_12,r),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_146,definition,
    iPr_def_14 = or(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_13),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).

tcf(c_147,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(iPr_def_14),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_65,c_144,c_145,c_142,c_143,c_146]) ).

tcf(c_266,plain,
    theorem(or(not(q),iPr_def_11)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_143,c_99]) ).

tcf(c_269,plain,
    theorem(or(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_11)),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_266,c_144]) ).

tcf(c_276,plain,
    theorem(or(not(or(r,iPr_def_12)),iPr_def_13)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_145,c_104]) ).

tcf(c_282,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( theorem(or(X1,X0))
      | ~ theorem(X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_99,c_64]) ).

tcf(c_283,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( theorem(or(X1,X0))
      | ~ theorem(or(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_104,c_64]) ).

tcf(c_339,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( theorem(or(X1,or(X0,X2)))
      | ~ theorem(or(X0,or(X1,X2))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_109,c_64]) ).

tcf(c_403,plain,
    theorem(or(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_269,c_283]) ).

tcf(c_467,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : theorem(or(not(or(not(X0),iPr_def_13)),or(not(or(iPr_def_11,X0)),iPr_def_14))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_146,c_114]) ).

tcf(c_720,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( theorem(or(X0,or(X2,X1)))
      | ~ theorem(or(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_282,c_339]) ).

tcf(c_1824,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( theorem(or(not(or(iPr_def_11,X0)),iPr_def_14))
      | ~ theorem(or(not(X0),iPr_def_13)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_467,c_64]) ).

tcf(c_2358,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( theorem(iPr_def_14)
      | ~ theorem(or(iPr_def_11,X0))
      | ~ theorem(or(not(X0),iPr_def_13)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1824,c_64]) ).

tcf(c_2362,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ theorem(or(iPr_def_11,X0))
      | ~ theorem(or(not(X0),iPr_def_13)) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2358,c_147]) ).

tcf(c_2373,plain,
    ~ theorem(or(iPr_def_11,or(r,iPr_def_12))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_276,c_2362]) ).

tcf(c_5225,plain,
    ~ theorem(or(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_720,c_2373]) ).

tcf(c_5239,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_5225,c_403]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL323-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.38  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 22:51:33 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.38  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.43  
% 0.11/0.43  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.11/0.43  
% 0.11/0.43  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.11/0.44  % Proving...
% 6.88/1.75  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 6.88/1.75  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 6.88/1.75  
% 6.88/1.75  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 6.88/1.75  
% 6.88/1.75  % ------  iProver source info
% 6.88/1.75  
% 6.88/1.75  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 6.88/1.75  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 6.88/1.75  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 6.88/1.75  
% 6.88/1.75  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 6.88/1.75  
% 6.88/1.75  
% 6.88/1.75  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 6.88/1.75  
% 6.88/1.75  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 6.88/1.75  
% 6.88/1.75  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 6.88/1.75  
% 6.88/1.75  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 6.88/1.75  % ------ Proving...
% 6.88/1.75  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 6.88/1.75  
% 6.88/1.75  % 
% 6.88/1.75  % clauses                               12
% 6.88/1.75  % conjectures                           1
% 6.88/1.75  % EPR                                   1
% 6.88/1.75  % Horn                                  12
% 6.88/1.75  % unary                                 11
% 6.88/1.75  % binary                                0
% 6.88/1.75  % lits                                  14
% 6.88/1.75  % lits eq                               5
% 6.88/1.75  % fd_pure                               0
% 6.88/1.75  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 6.88/1.75  % fd_cond                               0
% 6.88/1.75  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 6.88/1.75  % AC symbols                            0
% 6.88/1.75  
% 6.88/1.75  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 6.88/1.75  
% 6.88/1.75  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 6.88/1.75  
% 6.88/1.75  
% 6.88/1.75  % ------ 
% 6.88/1.75  % Current options:
% 6.88/1.75  % ------ 
% 6.88/1.75  
% 6.88/1.75  
% 6.88/1.75  % 
% 6.88/1.75  
% 6.88/1.75  % ------ Proving...
% 6.88/1.75  % 
% 6.88/1.75  
% 6.88/1.75  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 6.88/1.75  
% 6.88/1.75  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 6.88/1.75  
% 6.88/1.75  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------