↑ Up

ConnectPP---0.7.2.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ConnectPP---0.7.2
% Problem  : LCL357-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 08:49:07 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 5.82s
% Output   : Proof 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   14 (  11 unt;   0 nHn;  13 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   20 (   0 equ;   8 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    5 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(condensed_detachment,axiom,
    ( is_a_theorem(Y)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).

cnf(cn_1,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(implies(Y,Z),implies(X,Z)))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cn_1) ).

cnf(prove_cn_06,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(x,y),implies(implies(implies(x,z),u),implies(implies(y,z),u)))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_cn_06) ).

cnf(t1,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(x,y),implies(implies(implies(x,z),u),implies(implies(y,z),u)))),
    inference(start,[status(thm),parent(0:0)],[prove_cn_06]) ).

cnf(t2,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(y,z),implies(x,z)),implies(implies(implies(x,z),u),implies(implies(y,z),u))))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(y,z),implies(x,z)),implies(implies(implies(x,z),u),implies(implies(y,z),u))),implies(implies(x,y),implies(implies(implies(x,z),u),implies(implies(y,z),u)))))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(x,y),implies(implies(implies(x,z),u),implies(implies(y,z),u)))) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:1)],[condensed_detachment]) ).

cnf(t3,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t2:1)],[t2:1,t1:1]) ).

cnf(t4,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(x,y),implies(implies(y,z),implies(x,z))))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(x,y),implies(implies(y,z),implies(x,z))),implies(implies(implies(implies(y,z),implies(x,z)),implies(implies(implies(x,z),u),implies(implies(y,z),u))),implies(implies(x,y),implies(implies(implies(x,z),u),implies(implies(y,z),u))))))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(y,z),implies(x,z)),implies(implies(implies(x,z),u),implies(implies(y,z),u))),implies(implies(x,y),implies(implies(implies(x,z),u),implies(implies(y,z),u))))) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:2)],[condensed_detachment]) ).

cnf(t5,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t4:1)],[t4:1,t2:2]) ).

cnf(t6,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(x,y),implies(implies(y,z),implies(x,z))),implies(implies(implies(implies(y,z),implies(x,z)),implies(implies(implies(x,z),u),implies(implies(y,z),u))),implies(implies(x,y),implies(implies(implies(x,z),u),implies(implies(y,z),u)))))),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t4:2)],[cn_1]) ).

cnf(t7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t6:1)],[t6:1,t4:2]) ).

cnf(t8,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(x,y),implies(implies(y,z),implies(x,z)))),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t4:3)],[cn_1]) ).

cnf(t9,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t8:1)],[t8:1,t4:3]) ).

cnf(t10,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(y,z),implies(x,z)),implies(implies(implies(x,z),u),implies(implies(y,z),u)))),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:3)],[cn_1]) ).

cnf(t11,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t10:1)],[t10:1,t2:3]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL357-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.00/0.03  This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN problem
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/5.79  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.11/5.79  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/5.79  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/5.79  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/5.79  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/5.79  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/5.79  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/5.79  % DateTime : Sat Sep 19 14:48:16 UTC 2026
% 0.11/5.79  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/5.82  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.15/5.82  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------