↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : LCL357-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:06:24 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.85s 1.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.85s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (  21 unt;   7 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   77 (   7 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   21 (  13   ~;   8   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   10 (   8 usr;   8 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   0 sgn  16   !;   0   ?;  11   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(X1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X0,X2)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cn_1) ).

fof(f5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(x,y),implies(implies(implies(x,z),u),implies(implies(y,z),u)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_cn_06) ).

tcf(c_54,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(X1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_55,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X0,X2)))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_58,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(x,y),implies(implies(implies(x,z),u),implies(implies(y,z),u)))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_76,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = implies(x,y),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_77,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = implies(x,z),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_78,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = implies(iPr_def_11,u),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_79,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = implies(y,z),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_80,definition,
    iPr_def_14 = implies(iPr_def_13,u),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).

tcf(c_81,definition,
    iPr_def_15 = implies(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_14),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_15])],[]) ).

tcf(c_82,definition,
    iPr_def_16 = implies(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_15),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_16])],[]) ).

tcf(c_83,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(iPr_def_16),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_58,c_79,c_80,c_77,c_78,c_81,c_76,c_82]) ).

tcf(c_226,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(iPr_def_10,implies(implies(y,X0),implies(x,X0)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_76,c_55]) ).

tcf(c_236,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,iPr_def_11),implies(iPr_def_12,implies(X0,u)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_78,c_55]) ).

tcf(c_246,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(iPr_def_10,X0),implies(implies(X0,iPr_def_15),iPr_def_16))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_82,c_55]) ).

tcf(c_357,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(iPr_def_10,implies(implies(y,z),iPr_def_11))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_77,c_226]) ).

tcf(c_359,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(iPr_def_10,implies(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_11))),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_357,c_79]) ).

tcf(c_611,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_11),implies(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_14))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_80,c_236]) ).

tcf(c_613,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_11),iPr_def_15)),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_611,c_81]) ).

tcf(c_777,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,iPr_def_15),iPr_def_16))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(iPr_def_10,X0)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_246,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_1048,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(iPr_def_16)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(iPr_def_10,X0))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,iPr_def_15)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_777,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_1049,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(iPr_def_10,X0))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,iPr_def_15)) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1048,c_83]) ).

tcf(c_1060,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_11),iPr_def_15)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_359,c_1049]) ).

tcf(c_1063,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1060,c_613]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL357-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 23:02:12 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.10/0.43  % Proving...
% 1.85/1.28  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.85/1.28  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.85/1.28  
% 1.85/1.28  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.85/1.28  
% 1.85/1.28  % ------  iProver source info
% 1.85/1.28  
% 1.85/1.28  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.85/1.28  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.85/1.28  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.85/1.28  
% 1.85/1.28  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 1.85/1.28  
% 1.85/1.28  
% 1.85/1.28  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 1.85/1.28  
% 1.85/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 1.85/1.28  
% 1.85/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 1.85/1.28  
% 1.85/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 1.85/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 1.85/1.28  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 1.85/1.28  
% 1.85/1.28  % 
% 1.85/1.28  % clauses                               12
% 1.85/1.28  % conjectures                           1
% 1.85/1.28  % EPR                                   1
% 1.85/1.28  % Horn                                  12
% 1.85/1.28  % unary                                 11
% 1.85/1.28  % binary                                0
% 1.85/1.28  % lits                                  14
% 1.85/1.28  % lits eq                               7
% 1.85/1.28  % fd_pure                               0
% 1.85/1.28  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 1.85/1.28  % fd_cond                               0
% 1.85/1.28  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 1.85/1.28  % AC symbols                            0
% 1.85/1.28  
% 1.85/1.28  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 1.85/1.28  
% 1.85/1.28  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.85/1.28  
% 1.85/1.28  
% 1.85/1.28  % ------ 
% 1.85/1.28  % Current options:
% 1.85/1.28  % ------ 
% 1.85/1.28  
% 1.85/1.28  
% 1.85/1.28  % 
% 1.85/1.28  
% 1.85/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 1.85/1.28  % 
% 1.85/1.28  
% 1.85/1.28  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.85/1.28  
% 1.85/1.28  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.85/1.28  
% 1.85/1.28  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------