↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : LCL359-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.891d73eZ0Z true

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 01:35:45 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.42s 0.73s
% Output   : Refutation 0.42s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL359-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.891d73eZ0Z true
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Sat Sep  5 22:38:49 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.10/0.37  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.37  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.10/0.37  % Python version: Python 3.12.3
% 0.10/0.38  % Running in FO mode
% 0.37/0.59  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.37/0.59  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.37/0.59  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.42/0.67  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.42/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.42/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.42/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.42/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.42/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.42/0.73  % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.42/0.73  % BCE start: 5
% 0.42/0.73  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.42/0.73  % PE start: 5
% 0.42/0.73  logic: neq
% 0.42/0.73  % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.42/0.73  % done 55 iterations in 0.049s
% 0.42/0.73  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.42/0.73  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.42/0.73  thf(y_type, type, y: $i).
% 0.42/0.73  thf(u_type, type, u: $i).
% 0.42/0.73  thf(is_a_theorem_type, type, is_a_theorem: $i > $o).
% 0.42/0.73  thf(implies_type, type, implies: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.42/0.73  thf(x_type, type, x: $i).
% 0.42/0.73  thf(z_type, type, z: $i).
% 0.42/0.73  thf(cn_1, axiom,
% 0.42/0.73    (is_a_theorem @
% 0.42/0.73     ( implies @
% 0.42/0.73       ( implies @ X @ Y ) @ 
% 0.42/0.73       ( implies @ ( implies @ Y @ Z ) @ ( implies @ X @ Z ) ) ))).
% 0.42/0.73  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.42/0.73      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.42/0.73          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.42/0.73           (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @ 
% 0.42/0.73            (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ (implies @ X0 @ X2))))),
% 0.42/0.73      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cn_1])).
% 0.42/0.73  thf(condensed_detachment, axiom,
% 0.42/0.73    (( ~( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X @ Y ) ) ) | ( ~( is_a_theorem @ X ) ) | 
% 0.42/0.73     ( is_a_theorem @ Y ))).
% 0.42/0.73  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.42/0.73      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.42/0.73         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.42/0.73          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 0.42/0.73          |  (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 0.42/0.73      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 0.42/0.73  thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 0.42/0.73      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.42/0.73         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2))
% 0.42/0.73          |  (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.42/0.73              (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 0.42/0.73      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.42/0.73  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.42/0.73      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.42/0.73          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.42/0.73           (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @ 
% 0.42/0.73            (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ (implies @ X0 @ X2))))),
% 0.42/0.73      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cn_1])).
% 0.42/0.73  thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 0.42/0.73      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.42/0.73         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2))
% 0.42/0.73          |  (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.42/0.73              (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 0.42/0.73      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.42/0.73  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.42/0.73      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.42/0.73         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.42/0.73          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 0.42/0.73          |  (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 0.42/0.73      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 0.42/0.73  thf(zip_derived_cl11, plain,
% 0.42/0.73      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.42/0.73         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2))
% 0.42/0.73          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ X0))
% 0.42/0.73          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 0.42/0.73      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.42/0.73  thf(zip_derived_cl14, plain,
% 0.42/0.73      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.42/0.73         (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.42/0.73             (implies @ 
% 0.42/0.73              (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)) @ X3))
% 0.42/0.73          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ X3)))),
% 0.42/0.73      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl11])).
% 0.42/0.73  thf(zip_derived_cl41, plain,
% 0.42/0.73      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.42/0.73         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ (implies @ X3 @ X0)))
% 0.42/0.73          |  (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.42/0.73              (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X3) @ 
% 0.42/0.73               (implies @ X2 @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))))),
% 0.42/0.73      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl14])).
% 0.42/0.73  thf(zip_derived_cl14, plain,
% 0.42/0.73      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.42/0.73         (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.42/0.73             (implies @ 
% 0.42/0.73              (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)) @ X3))
% 0.42/0.73          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ X3)))),
% 0.42/0.73      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl11])).
% 0.42/0.73  thf(zip_derived_cl185, plain,
% 0.42/0.73      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i, X4 : $i]:
% 0.42/0.73         (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.42/0.73             (implies @ X3 @ (implies @ (implies @ X4 @ X1) @ X0)))
% 0.42/0.73          |  (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.42/0.73              (implies @ (implies @ X4 @ X2) @ 
% 0.42/0.73               (implies @ X3 @ (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X1) @ X0)))))),
% 0.42/0.73      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl41, zip_derived_cl14])).
% 0.42/0.73  thf(prove_cn_08, conjecture,
% 0.42/0.73    (is_a_theorem @
% 0.42/0.73     ( implies @
% 0.42/0.73       ( implies @ x @ y ) @ 
% 0.42/0.73       ( implies @
% 0.42/0.73         ( implies @ z @ x ) @ 
% 0.42/0.73         ( implies @ ( implies @ y @ u ) @ ( implies @ z @ u ) ) ) ))).
% 0.42/0.73  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.42/0.73    (~( is_a_theorem @
% 0.42/0.73        ( implies @
% 0.42/0.73          ( implies @ x @ y ) @ 
% 0.42/0.73          ( implies @
% 0.42/0.73            ( implies @ z @ x ) @ 
% 0.42/0.73            ( implies @ ( implies @ y @ u ) @ ( implies @ z @ u ) ) ) ) )),
% 0.42/0.73    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_cn_08])).
% 0.42/0.73  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 0.42/0.73      (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.42/0.73          (implies @ (implies @ x @ y) @ 
% 0.42/0.73           (implies @ (implies @ z @ x) @ 
% 0.42/0.73            (implies @ (implies @ y @ u) @ (implies @ z @ u)))))),
% 0.42/0.73      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.42/0.73  thf(zip_derived_cl197, plain,
% 0.42/0.73      (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.42/0.73          (implies @ (implies @ z @ x) @ 
% 0.42/0.73           (implies @ (implies @ x @ u) @ (implies @ z @ u))))),
% 0.42/0.73      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl185, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 0.42/0.73  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.42/0.73      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.42/0.73          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.42/0.73           (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @ 
% 0.42/0.73            (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ (implies @ X0 @ X2))))),
% 0.42/0.73      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cn_1])).
% 0.42/0.73  thf(zip_derived_cl198, plain, ($false),
% 0.42/0.73      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl197, zip_derived_cl1])).
% 0.42/0.73  
% 0.42/0.73  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.42/0.73  
% 0.42/0.73  
% 0.42/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.42/0.74  % Terminating...
% 0.42/0.78  % Runner terminated.
% 0.42/0.79  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------