%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem : LCL364-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:58:40 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.11s 0.47s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 13
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 37 ( 22 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 54 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 36 ( 19 ~; 17 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 94 ( 16 sgn 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(condensed_detachment,axiom,
! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
( is_a_theorem(VAR_1)
| ~ is_a_theorem(VAR_0)
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(VAR_0,VAR_1)) ),
file('theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).
cnf(c_1,plain,
( is_a_theorem(B)
| ~ is_a_theorem(A)
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,B)) ),
inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment]) ).
fof(cn_1,axiom,
! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(VAR_0,VAR_1),implies(implies(VAR_1,VAR_2),implies(VAR_0,VAR_2)))),
file('theBenchmark.p',cn_1) ).
cnf(c_2,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C)))),
inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cn_1]) ).
fof(cn_2,axiom,
! [VAR_0] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(VAR_0),VAR_0),VAR_0)),
file('theBenchmark.p',cn_2) ).
cnf(c_3,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(A),A),A)),
inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cn_2]) ).
fof(cn_3,axiom,
! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : is_a_theorem(implies(VAR_0,implies(not(VAR_0),VAR_1))),
file('theBenchmark.p',cn_3) ).
cnf(c_4,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(not(A),B))),
inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cn_3]) ).
fof(prove_cn_13,axiom,
~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(x),y),implies(z,implies(implies(y,x),x)))),
file('theBenchmark.p',prove_cn_13) ).
cnf(c_5,plain,
~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(x),y),implies(z,implies(implies(y,x),x)))),
inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[prove_cn_13]) ).
cnf(c_936,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,B)) ),
inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_2]) ).
cnf(c_6,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(A,B),implies(C,B)),D),implies(implies(C,A),D))),
inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_936,c_2]) ).
cnf(c_937,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,B)) ),
inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_2]) ).
cnf(c_7,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(not(A),A),B))),
inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_937,c_3]) ).
cnf(c_938,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,B)) ),
inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_2]) ).
cnf(c_9,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(not(A),B),C),implies(A,C))),
inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_938,c_4]) ).
cnf(c_939,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(C,A),D))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),implies(C,B)),D)) ),
inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_6]) ).
cnf(c_12,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(B,C)),implies(implies(D,B),implies(A,implies(D,C))))),
inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_939,c_6]) ).
cnf(c_940,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(A),A),B))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,B)) ),
inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_7]) ).
cnf(c_17,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(implies(A,B)),implies(A,B)),implies(implies(not(A),A),B))),
inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_940,c_7]) ).
cnf(c_941,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(C,A),D))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),implies(C,B)),D)) ),
inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_6]) ).
cnf(c_34,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,not(B)),implies(B,implies(A,C)))),
inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_941,c_9]) ).
cnf(c_942,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(A,C))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(A),B),C)) ),
inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_9]) ).
cnf(c_39,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(A,A)),
inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_942,c_3]) ).
cnf(c_943,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(not(A),B))
| ~ is_a_theorem(A) ),
inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_4]) ).
cnf(c_41,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(not(implies(A,A)),B)),
inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_943,c_39]) ).
cnf(c_944,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(B,implies(A,C)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,not(B))) ),
inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_34]) ).
cnf(c_88,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(not(implies(B,B)),C))),
inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_944,c_41]) ).
cnf(c_945,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,B)) ),
inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_2]) ).
cnf(c_96,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(not(implies(A,A)),B),C),implies(D,C))),
inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_945,c_88]) ).
cnf(c_946,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(D,C))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(implies(A,A)),B),C)) ),
inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_96]) ).
cnf(c_394,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(not(B),B),B))),
inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_946,c_17]) ).
cnf(c_947,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(D,B),implies(A,implies(D,C))))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,C))) ),
inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_12]) ).
cnf(c_445,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(not(B),B)),implies(C,implies(A,B)))),
inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_947,c_394]) ).
cnf(c_948,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(C,A),D))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),implies(C,B)),D)) ),
inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_6]) ).
cnf(c_934,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(A),B),implies(C,implies(implies(B,A),A)))),
inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_948,c_445]) ).
cnf(c_935,plain,
$false,
inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_934,c_5]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : LCL364-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.37 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 22:19:34 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.11/0.37 % Process 3900991 was started by sandbox on n019,
% 0.11/0.37 % Fri Sep 25 22:19:34 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.11/0.38
% 0.11/0.38 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.11/0.47
% 0.11/0.47 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.11/0.47
% 0.11/0.47 % Proof 1 at 0.05 (+ 0.03) seconds.
% 0.11/0.47 % Length of proof is 19.
% 0.11/0.47 % Level of proof is 9.
% 0.11/0.47 % Maximum clause weight is 71.000.
% 0.11/0.47 % Given clauses 91.
% 0.11/0.47
% 0.11/0.47 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------