↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : LCL364-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 01:07:20 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.65s 0.94s
% Output   : Refutation 0.65s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   27 (  19 unt;   0 nHn;  27 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   37 (   0 equ;  11 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(u)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(u,v))
    | is_a_theorem(v) ),
    file('LCL364-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(u,v),implies__dfg(implies__dfg(v,w),implies__dfg(u,w)))),
    file('LCL364-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(not__dfg(u),u),u)),
    file('LCL364-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(u,implies__dfg(not__dfg(u),v))),
    file('LCL364-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(not__dfg(x__dfg),y__dfg),implies__dfg(z__dfg,implies__dfg(implies__dfg(y__dfg,x__dfg),x__dfg)))),
    file('LCL364-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(13,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(u,v))
    | is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(v,w),implies__dfg(u,w))) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[2,1]),
    [iquote('0:Res:2.0,1.1')] ).

cnf(17,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(u,v),implies__dfg(w,v)),x),implies__dfg(implies__dfg(w,u),x))),
    inference(sor,[status(thm)],[13,2]),
    [iquote('0:SoR:13.0,2.0')] ).

cnf(18,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(not__dfg(u),v),w),implies__dfg(u,w))),
    inference(sor,[status(thm)],[13,4]),
    [iquote('0:SoR:13.0,4.0')] ).

cnf(19,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(u,v),implies__dfg(implies__dfg(not__dfg(u),u),v))),
    inference(sor,[status(thm)],[13,3]),
    [iquote('0:SoR:13.0,3.0')] ).

cnf(21,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(not__dfg(u),v),w))
    | is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(u,w)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[18,1]),
    [iquote('0:Res:18.0,1.1')] ).

cnf(22,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(not__dfg(u),u),v),w),implies__dfg(implies__dfg(u,v),w))),
    inference(sor,[status(thm)],[13,19]),
    [iquote('0:SoR:13.0,19.0')] ).

cnf(30,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(u,u)),
    inference(sor,[status(thm)],[21,3]),
    [iquote('0:SoR:21.0,3.0')] ).

cnf(35,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(u,v),implies__dfg(w,v)),x))
    | is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(w,u),x)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[17,1]),
    [iquote('0:Res:17.0,1.1')] ).

cnf(110,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(u,implies__dfg(not__dfg(v),v)),implies__dfg(implies__dfg(v,w),implies__dfg(u,w)))),
    inference(sor,[status(thm)],[35,22]),
    [iquote('0:SoR:35.0,22.0')] ).

cnf(114,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(u,not__dfg(v)),implies__dfg(v,implies__dfg(u,w)))),
    inference(sor,[status(thm)],[35,18]),
    [iquote('0:SoR:35.0,18.0')] ).

cnf(124,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(u,implies__dfg(v,implies__dfg(not__dfg(u),w)))),
    inference(sor,[status(thm)],[21,114]),
    [iquote('0:SoR:21.0,114.0')] ).

cnf(127,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(u,implies__dfg(not__dfg(v),w)),x),implies__dfg(v,x))),
    inference(sor,[status(thm)],[13,124]),
    [iquote('0:SoR:13.0,124.0')] ).

cnf(168,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(u,implies__dfg(not__dfg(v),w)),x))
    | is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(v,x)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[127,1]),
    [iquote('0:Res:127.0,1.1')] ).

cnf(224,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(u,implies__dfg(implies__dfg(u,v),implies__dfg(w,v)))),
    inference(sor,[status(thm)],[168,110]),
    [iquote('0:SoR:168.0,110.0')] ).

cnf(246,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(u)
    | is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(u,v),implies__dfg(w,v))) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[224,1]),
    [iquote('0:Res:224.0,1.1')] ).

cnf(268,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(u)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(u,v))
    | is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(w,v)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[246,1]),
    [iquote('0:Res:246.1,1.1')] ).

cnf(314,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(u,v))
    | is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(w,implies__dfg(implies__dfg(not__dfg(u),u),v))) ),
    inference(sor,[status(thm)],[268,19]),
    [iquote('0:SoR:268.1,19.0')] ).

cnf(1073,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(u,implies__dfg(implies__dfg(not__dfg(v),v),v))),
    inference(sor,[status(thm)],[314,30]),
    [iquote('0:SoR:314.0,30.0')] ).

cnf(1094,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(not__dfg(u),u),u),v),implies__dfg(w,v))),
    inference(sor,[status(thm)],[13,1073]),
    [iquote('0:SoR:13.0,1073.0')] ).

cnf(1255,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(u,implies__dfg(not__dfg(v),v)),implies__dfg(w,implies__dfg(u,v)))),
    inference(sor,[status(thm)],[35,1094]),
    [iquote('0:SoR:35.0,1094.0')] ).

cnf(1297,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies__dfg(implies__dfg(not__dfg(u),v),implies__dfg(w,implies__dfg(implies__dfg(v,u),u)))),
    inference(sor,[status(thm)],[35,1255]),
    [iquote('0:SoR:35.0,1255.0')] ).

cnf(1303,plain,
    $false,
    inference(unc,[status(thm)],[1297,5]),
    [iquote('0:UnC:1297.0,5.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL364-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Sep  4 20:35:05 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.65/0.94  
% 0.65/0.94  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.65/0.94  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.65/0.94  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.65/0.94  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.65/0.94  SPASS derived 1263 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 663 clauses.
% 0.65/0.94  SPASS allocated 78067 KBytes.
% 0.65/0.94  SPASS spent	0:00:00.55 on the problem.
% 0.65/0.94  		0:00:00.06 for the input.
% 0.65/0.94  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.65/0.94  		0:00:00.06 for inferences.
% 0.65/0.94  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.65/0.94  		0:00:00.38 for the reduction.
% 0.65/0.94  
% 0.65/0.94  
% 0.65/0.94  Here is a proof with depth 15, length 27 :
% 0.65/0.94  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.65/0.94  Formulae used in the proof : condensed_detachment cn_1 cn_2 cn_3 prove_cn_13
% 0.65/0.94  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------