↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : LCL365+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v9.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:12:30 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 26.11s 4.48s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 26.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   43 (  23 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   70 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   58 (  31   ~;  25   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   91 (  12 sgn  16   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(condensed_detachment,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( is_a_theorem(X1)
        & is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) )
     => is_a_theorem(X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).

fof(cn_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cn_1) ).

fof(cn_2,axiom,
    ! [X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),X1),X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cn_2) ).

fof(cn_3,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(not(X1),X2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cn_3) ).

fof(prove_cn_14,conjecture,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(x,implies(implies(y,z),z)),u),implies(implies(not(z),y),u))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_cn_14) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( is_a_theorem(X5)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X4)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X4,X5)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X6,X7,X8] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X6,X7),implies(implies(X7,X8),implies(X6,X8)))),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[cn_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | is_a_theorem(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3)))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X3,X1))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X3,X2))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X9] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X9),X9),X9)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[cn_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X3))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X3,X2))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X10,X11] : is_a_theorem(implies(X10,implies(not(X10),X11))),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[cn_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),X1),X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X4))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X4,X3)))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(not(X1),X2))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(not(X2),X2)))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,not(X1)))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(X2),not(X1)))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
    | is_a_theorem(implies(not(X1),X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

fof(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(x,implies(implies(y,z),z)),u),implies(implies(not(z),y),u))),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_cn_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X4,X3))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X4))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_20]) ).

fof(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(x,implies(implies(y,z),z)),u),implies(implies(not(z),y),u))),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X3,implies(X2,X4)))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X3,implies(X1,X4)))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X2),X4),X3))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(implies(not(X1),X1)),implies(not(X1),X1)),X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(x,implies(implies(y,z),z)),u),implies(implies(not(z),y),u))),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X4,X2)))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X4,X3)))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(implies(X1,X3)),implies(X2,X3)))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X1,X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(implies(not(X2),X2),X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(x,implies(implies(y,z),z)),u),implies(implies(not(z),y),u))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X3,X5)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,implies(X5,X4)))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,implies(X3,X4)))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X3,X5),implies(X2,X5)),X4))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(implies(X2,X3),X4))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,implies(not(X2),X2)),implies(X1,X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(z),y),implies(x,implies(implies(y,z),z)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X3,X4)))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,implies(X3,X4)))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(X1),X1))
    | is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(implies(not(X2),X3),implies(implies(X3,X2),X2)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(z),y),implies(implies(y,z),z))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),X2),implies(implies(X2,X1),X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : LCL365+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v9.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.56  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.56  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.56  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.56  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.56  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.56  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.56  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.56  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 00:19:27 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.56  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.56  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.61  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.61  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 26.11/4.48  % Version: 3.5.1
% 26.11/4.48  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 26.11/4.48  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 26.11/4.48  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 26.11/4.48  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 26.11/4.48  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 26.11/4.48  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 26.11/4.48  % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 1011638 completed with status 0
% 26.11/4.48  % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 26.11/4.48  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 26.11/4.48  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 26.11/4.48  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 26.11/4.48  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 26.11/4.48  % No SInE strategy applied
% 26.11/4.48  % Search class: FHUNS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 26.11/4.48  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 26.11/4.48  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 26.11/4.48  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 26.11/4.48  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 26.11/4.48  % Starting H----_011_C07_F1_PI_SE_SP_S0V with 136s (1) cores
% 26.11/4.48  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 26.11/4.48  % H----_011_C07_F1_PI_SE_SP_S0V with pid 1011647 completed with status 0
% 26.11/4.48  % Result found by H----_011_C07_F1_PI_SE_SP_S0V
% 26.11/4.48  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 26.11/4.48  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 26.11/4.48  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 26.11/4.48  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 26.11/4.48  % No SInE strategy applied
% 26.11/4.48  % Search class: FHUNS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 26.11/4.48  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 26.11/4.48  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 26.11/4.48  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 26.11/4.48  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 26.11/4.48  % Starting H----_011_C07_F1_PI_SE_SP_S0V with 136s (1) cores
% 26.11/4.48  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 26.11/4.48  
% 26.11/4.48  % Proof found!
% 26.11/4.48  % SZS status Theorem
% 26.11/4.48  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 26.11/4.48  % Parsed axioms                        : 5
% 26.11/4.48  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 26.11/4.48  % Initial clauses                      : 5
% 26.11/4.48  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 26.11/4.48  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 5
% 26.11/4.48  % Processed clauses                    : 26139
% 26.11/4.48  % ...of these trivial                  : 240
% 26.11/4.48  % ...subsumed                          : 23817
% 26.11/4.48  % ...remaining for further processing  : 2082
% 26.11/4.48  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 26.11/4.48  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 26.11/4.48  % Backward-subsumed                    : 234
% 26.11/4.48  % Backward-rewritten                   : 6
% 26.11/4.48  % Generated clauses                    : 141344
% 26.11/4.48  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 137278
% 26.11/4.48  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 26.11/4.48  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 26.11/4.48  % Paramodulations                      : 141344
% 26.11/4.48  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 26.11/4.48  % NegExts                              : 0
% 26.11/4.48  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 26.11/4.48  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 26.11/4.48  % Total rewrite steps                  : 4483
% 26.11/4.48  % ...of those cached                   : 3976
% 26.11/4.48  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 26.11/4.48  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 26.11/4.48  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 26.11/4.48  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 26.11/4.48  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 26.11/4.48  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 26.11/4.48  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 26.11/4.48  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 26.11/4.48  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 26.11/4.48  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 26.11/4.48  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 26.11/4.48  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 26.11/4.48  % Current number of processed clauses  : 1842
% 26.11/4.48  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 107
% 26.11/4.48  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 26.11/4.48  %    Negative unit clauses             : 107
% 26.11/4.48  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1628
% 26.11/4.48  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 110899
% 26.11/4.48  % ...number of literals in the above   : 397841
% 26.11/4.48  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 26.11/4.48  % Current number of archived clauses   : 240
% 26.11/4.48  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 469978
% 26.11/4.48  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 325071
% 26.11/4.48  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 18801
% 26.11/4.48  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12038
% 26.11/4.48  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 26.11/4.48  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 16729
% 26.11/4.48  % BW rewrite match successes           : 7
% 26.11/4.48  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 26.11/4.48  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 26.11/4.48  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 2168970
% 26.11/4.48  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 19
% 26.11/4.48  
% 26.11/4.48  % -------------------------------------------------
% 26.11/4.48  % User time                : 3.609 s
% 26.11/4.48  % System time              : 0.115 s
% 26.11/4.48  % Total time               : 3.724 s
% 26.11/4.48  % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 26.11/4.48  
% 26.11/4.48  % -------------------------------------------------
% 26.11/4.48  % User time                : 18.133 s
% 26.11/4.48  % System time              : 0.664 s
% 26.11/4.48  % Total time               : 18.797 s
% 26.11/4.48  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 26.11/4.48  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------