↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : LCL380-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:12:34 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 4.91s 1.31s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.91s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   42 (  21 unt;   0 nHn;  17 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   71 (   0 equ;  33 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   94 (  16 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(condensed_detachment,axiom,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | is_a_theorem(X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).

cnf(cn_1,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cn_1) ).

cnf(cn_2,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),X1),X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cn_2) ).

cnf(cn_3,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(not(X1),X2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cn_3) ).

cnf(prove_cn_41,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(x,y),implies(not(not(x)),y))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_cn_41) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | is_a_theorem(X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | is_a_theorem(X2) ),
    c_0_5 ).

cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3)))),
    cn_1 ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X3,X1))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X3,X2))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X3))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X3,X2))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),X1),X1)),
    cn_2 ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X4))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X4,X3)))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(not(X1),X2))),
    cn_3 ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X4,X2)))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X4,X3)))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(not(X2),X2)))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,not(X1)))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X3,X5)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,implies(X5,X4)))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,implies(X3,X4)))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(X2),X1))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(not(X2),X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(implies(not(not(X1)),not(X1)),X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X3,not(X2))))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,implies(X3,X4)))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(X3),X1))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(not(X1),X2),X3),X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(implies(not(X1),X1)),implies(not(X1),X1)),X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X3,implies(not(not(X2)),not(X2)))))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,implies(X3,X4)))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,implies(not(X1),X3)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X4,X1))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X3,X4))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X3,X2))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(X2),X3))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(implies(not(X3),X4),X2)))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(not(implies(not(X2),X2)),implies(not(X2),X2))))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(not(X1),implies(X1,implies(X2,X3)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X3),X4),X1))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X3,X2))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(X2),not(X1)))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(implies(not(X1),X1))),X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(x,y),implies(not(not(x)),y))),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_cn_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(not(X1),X2),X3),implies(X1,X3))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,not(implies(not(not(X1)),not(X1))))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(x,y),implies(not(not(x)),y))),
    c_0_33 ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),X3),X2))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(not(not(X1))),not(not(X1))),X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(x)),x)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(X1)),X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : LCL380-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.45  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.45  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.45  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.45  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.45  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.45  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.45  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.18/0.45  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 00:25:47 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.45  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.45  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.26/0.53  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.26/0.54  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.91/1.31  % Version: 3.5.1
% 4.91/1.31  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 4.91/1.31  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.91/1.31  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 4.91/1.31  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 4.91/1.31  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 4.91/1.31  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 4.91/1.31  % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 2149842 completed with status 0
% 4.91/1.31  % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 4.91/1.31  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 4.91/1.31  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.91/1.31  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 4.91/1.31  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 4.91/1.31  % No SInE strategy applied
% 4.91/1.31  % Search class: FHUNS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 4.91/1.31  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 4.91/1.31  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 4.91/1.31  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 4.91/1.31  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 4.91/1.31  % Starting H----_011_C07_F1_PI_SE_SP_S0V with 136s (1) cores
% 4.91/1.31  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 4.91/1.31  % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with pid 2149845 completed with status 0
% 4.91/1.31  % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN
% 4.91/1.31  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 4.91/1.31  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.91/1.31  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 4.91/1.31  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 4.91/1.31  % No SInE strategy applied
% 4.91/1.31  % Search class: FHUNS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 4.91/1.31  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 4.91/1.31  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 4.91/1.31  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 4.91/1.31  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 4.91/1.31  % Preprocessing time       : 0.004 s
% 4.91/1.31  
% 4.91/1.31  % Proof found!
% 4.91/1.31  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 4.91/1.31  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.91/1.31  % Parsed axioms                        : 5
% 4.91/1.31  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 4.91/1.31  % Initial clauses                      : 5
% 4.91/1.31  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 4.91/1.31  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 5
% 4.91/1.31  % Processed clauses                    : 1803
% 4.91/1.31  % ...of these trivial                  : 10
% 4.91/1.31  % ...subsumed                          : 1380
% 4.91/1.31  % ...remaining for further processing  : 413
% 4.91/1.31  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 4.91/1.31  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 4.91/1.31  % Backward-subsumed                    : 9
% 4.91/1.31  % Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 4.91/1.31  % Generated clauses                    : 16982
% 4.91/1.31  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 16650
% 4.91/1.31  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 4.91/1.31  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 4.91/1.31  % Paramodulations                      : 16982
% 4.91/1.31  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 4.91/1.31  % NegExts                              : 0
% 4.91/1.31  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 4.91/1.31  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 4.91/1.31  % Total rewrite steps                  : 131
% 4.91/1.31  % ...of those cached                   : 105
% 4.91/1.31  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 4.91/1.31  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 4.91/1.31  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 4.91/1.31  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 4.91/1.31  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 4.91/1.31  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 4.91/1.31  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 4.91/1.31  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 4.91/1.31  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 4.91/1.31  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 4.91/1.31  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 4.91/1.31  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 4.91/1.31  % Current number of processed clauses  : 402
% 4.91/1.31  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 28
% 4.91/1.31  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 4.91/1.31  %    Negative unit clauses             : 8
% 4.91/1.31  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 366
% 4.91/1.31  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 14800
% 4.91/1.31  % ...number of literals in the above   : 45462
% 4.91/1.31  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 4.91/1.31  % Current number of archived clauses   : 11
% 4.91/1.31  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 24093
% 4.91/1.31  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 23270
% 4.91/1.31  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1378
% 4.91/1.31  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 500
% 4.91/1.31  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 4.91/1.31  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 1367
% 4.91/1.31  % BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 4.91/1.31  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 4.91/1.31  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 4.91/1.31  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 282682
% 4.91/1.31  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 8
% 4.91/1.31  
% 4.91/1.31  % -------------------------------------------------
% 4.91/1.31  % User time                : 0.620 s
% 4.91/1.31  % System time              : 0.030 s
% 4.91/1.31  % Total time               : 0.650 s
% 4.91/1.31  % Maximum resident set size: 3376 pages
% 4.91/1.31  
% 4.91/1.31  % -------------------------------------------------
% 4.91/1.31  % User time                : 3.080 s
% 4.91/1.31  % System time              : 0.148 s
% 4.91/1.31  % Total time               : 3.228 s
% 4.91/1.31  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 4.91/1.31  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------