↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : LCL429-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:12:43 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.57s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   28 (  16 unt;   0 nHn;  16 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   49 (   0 equ;  24 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   15 (  15 usr;   7 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   82 (  10 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_PropLog_ODiff__weaken__left_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X2,X5,tc_set(tc_PropLog_Opl(X4)))
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(c_minus(X2,X3,tc_set(tc_PropLog_Opl(X4))),X4),tc_PropLog_Opl(X4))
    | c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(c_minus(X5,X3,tc_set(tc_PropLog_Opl(X4))),X4),tc_PropLog_Opl(X4)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_ODiff__weaken__left_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_p,c_PropLog_Othms(c_minus(c_PropLog_Ohyps(v_p,X1,t_a),v_F,tc_set(tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

cnf(cls_PropLog_Oweaken__left_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X2,X4,tc_set(tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)))
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3))
    | c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(X4,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Oweaken__left_0) ).

cnf(cls_PropLog_Ohyps__Diff_0,axiom,
    c_lessequals(c_PropLog_Ohyps(X1,c_minus(X2,c_insert(X3,c_emptyset,X4),tc_set(X4)),X4),c_insert(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Ovar(X3,X4),c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,X4),c_minus(c_PropLog_Ohyps(X1,X2,X4),c_insert(c_PropLog_Opl_Ovar(X3,X4),c_emptyset,tc_PropLog_Opl(X4)),tc_set(tc_PropLog_Opl(X4))),tc_PropLog_Opl(X4)),tc_set(tc_PropLog_Opl(X4))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Ohyps__Diff_0) ).

cnf(cls_PropLog_Othms__excluded__middle__rule_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X2,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,X4),X3,tc_PropLog_Opl(X4)),X4),tc_PropLog_Opl(X4))
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(X2,X3,tc_PropLog_Opl(X4)),X4),tc_PropLog_Opl(X4))
    | c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(X3,X4),tc_PropLog_Opl(X4)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms__excluded__middle__rule_0) ).

cnf(cls_PropLog_Oinsert__Diff__subset2_0,axiom,
    c_lessequals(c_minus(c_insert(X1,c_minus(X2,c_insert(X3,c_emptyset,X4),tc_set(X4)),X4),X5,tc_set(X4)),c_insert(X1,c_minus(X2,c_insert(X3,X5,X4),tc_set(X4)),X4),tc_set(X4)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Oinsert__Diff__subset2_0) ).

cnf(cls_PropLog_Oinsert__Diff__same_0,axiom,
    c_lessequals(c_minus(X1,X2,tc_set(X3)),c_insert(X4,c_minus(X1,c_insert(X4,X2,X3),tc_set(X3)),X3),tc_set(X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Oinsert__Diff__same_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(v_p,c_PropLog_Othms(c_minus(c_PropLog_Ohyps(v_p,v_t,t_a),c_insert(c_PropLog_Opl_Ovar(v_v,t_a),v_F,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),tc_set(tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X2,X5,tc_set(tc_PropLog_Opl(X4)))
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(c_minus(X2,X3,tc_set(tc_PropLog_Opl(X4))),X4),tc_PropLog_Opl(X4))
    | c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(c_minus(X5,X3,tc_set(tc_PropLog_Opl(X4))),X4),tc_PropLog_Opl(X4)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_PropLog_ODiff__weaken__left_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X2,X5,tc_set(tc_PropLog_Opl(X4)))
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(c_minus(X2,X3,tc_set(tc_PropLog_Opl(X4))),X4),tc_PropLog_Opl(X4))
    | c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(c_minus(X5,X3,tc_set(tc_PropLog_Opl(X4))),X4),tc_PropLog_Opl(X4)) ),
    c_0_8 ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_p,c_PropLog_Othms(c_minus(c_PropLog_Ohyps(v_p,X1,t_a),v_F,tc_set(tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    cls_conjecture_3 ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X2,X4,tc_set(tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)))
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3))
    | c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(X4,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_PropLog_Oweaken__left_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(c_PropLog_Ohyps(v_p,X2,t_a),X1,tc_set(tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)))
    | c_in(v_p,c_PropLog_Othms(c_minus(X1,v_F,tc_set(tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    c_lessequals(c_PropLog_Ohyps(X1,c_minus(X2,c_insert(X3,c_emptyset,X4),tc_set(X4)),X4),c_insert(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Ovar(X3,X4),c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,X4),c_minus(c_PropLog_Ohyps(X1,X2,X4),c_insert(c_PropLog_Opl_Ovar(X3,X4),c_emptyset,tc_PropLog_Opl(X4)),tc_set(tc_PropLog_Opl(X4))),tc_PropLog_Opl(X4)),tc_set(tc_PropLog_Opl(X4))),
    cls_PropLog_Ohyps__Diff_0 ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(X2,X4,tc_set(tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)))
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3))
    | c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(X4,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)) ),
    c_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_p,c_PropLog_Othms(c_minus(c_insert(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Ovar(X1,t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),c_minus(c_PropLog_Ohyps(v_p,X2,t_a),c_insert(c_PropLog_Opl_Ovar(X1,t_a),c_emptyset,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),tc_set(tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),v_F,tc_set(tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X2,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,X4),X3,tc_PropLog_Opl(X4)),X4),tc_PropLog_Opl(X4))
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(X2,X3,tc_PropLog_Opl(X4)),X4),tc_PropLog_Opl(X4))
    | c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(X3,X4),tc_PropLog_Opl(X4)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_PropLog_Othms__excluded__middle__rule_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(c_minus(c_insert(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Ovar(X2,t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),c_minus(c_PropLog_Ohyps(v_p,X3,t_a),c_insert(c_PropLog_Opl_Ovar(X2,t_a),c_emptyset,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),tc_set(tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),v_F,tc_set(tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))),X1,tc_set(tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)))
    | c_in(v_p,c_PropLog_Othms(X1,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
    c_lessequals(c_minus(c_insert(X1,c_minus(X2,c_insert(X3,c_emptyset,X4),tc_set(X4)),X4),X5,tc_set(X4)),c_insert(X1,c_minus(X2,c_insert(X3,X5,X4),tc_set(X4)),X4),tc_set(X4)),
    cls_PropLog_Oinsert__Diff__subset2_0 ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_lessequals(c_minus(c_PropLog_Ohyps(v_p,X2,t_a),v_F,tc_set(tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))),X1,tc_set(tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)))
    | c_in(v_p,c_PropLog_Othms(X1,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
    c_lessequals(c_minus(X1,X2,tc_set(X3)),c_insert(X4,c_minus(X1,c_insert(X4,X2,X3),tc_set(X3)),X3),tc_set(X3)),
    cls_PropLog_Oinsert__Diff__same_0 ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(v_p,c_PropLog_Othms(c_minus(c_PropLog_Ohyps(v_p,v_t,t_a),c_insert(c_PropLog_Opl_Ovar(v_v,t_a),v_F,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),tc_set(tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X2,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,X4),X3,tc_PropLog_Opl(X4)),X4),tc_PropLog_Opl(X4))
    | ~ c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(X2,X3,tc_PropLog_Opl(X4)),X4),tc_PropLog_Opl(X4))
    | c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(X3,X4),tc_PropLog_Opl(X4)) ),
    c_0_16 ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_p,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Ovar(X1,t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),c_minus(c_PropLog_Ohyps(v_p,X2,t_a),c_insert(c_PropLog_Opl_Ovar(X1,t_a),v_F,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),tc_set(tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_p,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(X1,c_minus(c_PropLog_Ohyps(v_p,X2,t_a),c_insert(X1,v_F,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),tc_set(tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(v_p,c_PropLog_Othms(c_minus(c_PropLog_Ohyps(v_p,v_t,t_a),c_insert(c_PropLog_Opl_Ovar(v_v,t_a),v_F,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),tc_set(tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    c_0_21 ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_p,c_PropLog_Othms(c_minus(c_PropLog_Ohyps(v_p,X1,t_a),c_insert(c_PropLog_Opl_Ovar(X2,t_a),v_F,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),tc_set(tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : LCL429-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.45  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.45  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.45  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.45  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.45  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.45  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.45  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.18/0.45  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 00:34:18 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.46  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.46  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.51  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.51  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.57  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.22/0.57  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.57  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.57  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.57  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.57  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.57  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.57  % new_bool_1 with pid 2069589 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.57  % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.22/0.57  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.57  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.57  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.57  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.57  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.57  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.22/0.57  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.22/0.57  % Search class: FHUNM-FFMF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.57  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.57  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.57  % SubtermCWHack with pid 2069595 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.57  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.22/0.57  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.57  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.57  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.57  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.57  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.57  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.22/0.57  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.22/0.57  % Search class: FHUNM-FFMF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.57  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.57  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.57  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.57  
% 0.22/0.57  % Proof found!
% 0.22/0.57  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.22/0.57  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.57  % Parsed axioms                        : 8
% 0.22/0.57  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.22/0.57  % Initial clauses                      : 8
% 0.22/0.57  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.22/0.57  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 8
% 0.22/0.57  % Processed clauses                    : 16
% 0.22/0.57  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.22/0.57  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.22/0.57  % ...remaining for further processing  : 16
% 0.22/0.57  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.22/0.57  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.22/0.57  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.22/0.57  % Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.22/0.57  % Generated clauses                    : 14
% 0.22/0.57  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 12
% 0.22/0.57  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.22/0.57  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.22/0.57  % Paramodulations                      : 14
% 0.22/0.57  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.22/0.57  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.22/0.57  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.22/0.57  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.22/0.57  % Total rewrite steps                  : 2
% 0.22/0.57  % ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.22/0.57  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.22/0.57  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.22/0.57  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.57  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.22/0.57  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.57  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.22/0.57  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.22/0.57  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.22/0.57  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.22/0.57  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.22/0.57  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.22/0.57  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.22/0.57  % Current number of processed clauses  : 15
% 0.22/0.57  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 8
% 0.22/0.57  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.57  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.22/0.57  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 7
% 0.22/0.57  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4
% 0.22/0.57  % ...number of literals in the above   : 7
% 0.22/0.57  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.22/0.57  % Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 0.22/0.57  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4
% 0.22/0.57  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.22/0.57  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.22/0.57  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.22/0.57  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.22/0.57  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 8
% 0.22/0.57  % BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.22/0.57  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.22/0.57  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.22/0.57  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 1244
% 0.22/0.57  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 20
% 0.22/0.57  
% 0.22/0.57  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.57  % User time                : 0.008 s
% 0.22/0.57  % System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.57  % Total time               : 0.010 s
% 0.22/0.57  % Maximum resident set size: 3644 pages
% 0.22/0.57  
% 0.22/0.57  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.57  % User time                : 0.010 s
% 0.22/0.57  % System time              : 0.010 s
% 0.22/0.57  % Total time               : 0.019 s
% 0.22/0.57  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.22/0.57  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------