↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : LCL431-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:58:53 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 58.72s 17.37s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 58.72s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   11 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   13 (   2 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    6 (   4   ~;   2   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   14 (   5 sgn   6   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(cls_conjecture_1,axiom,
    ~ c_in(v_p,c_PropLog_Othms(c_emptyset,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(c_513,plain,
    ~ c_in(v_p,c_PropLog_Othms(c_emptyset,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_1]) ).

fof(cls_conjecture_0,axiom,
    c_PropLog_Osat(c_emptyset,v_p,t_a),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(c_514,plain,
    c_PropLog_Osat(c_emptyset,v_p,t_a),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).

fof(cls_PropLog_Ocompleteness__0__lemma__dest_0,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3] :
      ( c_in(VAR_0,c_PropLog_Othms(c_minus(c_PropLog_Ohyps(VAR_0,VAR_2,VAR_1),c_PropLog_Ohyps(VAR_0,VAR_3,VAR_1),tc_set(tc_PropLog_Opl(VAR_1))),VAR_1),tc_PropLog_Opl(VAR_1))
      | ~ c_PropLog_Osat(c_emptyset,VAR_0,VAR_1) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Ocompleteness__0__lemma__dest_0) ).

cnf(c_540,plain,
    ( c_in(A,c_PropLog_Othms(c_minus(c_PropLog_Ohyps(A,C,B),c_PropLog_Ohyps(A,D,B),tc_set(tc_PropLog_Opl(B))),B),tc_PropLog_Opl(B))
    | ~ c_PropLog_Osat(c_emptyset,A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cls_PropLog_Ocompleteness__0__lemma__dest_0]) ).

fof(cls_Set_ODiff__cancel_0,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : c_minus(VAR_0,VAR_0,tc_set(VAR_1)) = c_emptyset,
    file('theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_ODiff__cancel_0) ).

cnf(c_1823,plain,
    c_minus(A,A,tc_set(B)) = c_emptyset,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cls_Set_ODiff__cancel_0]) ).

cnf(c_4664,plain,
    c_in(v_p,c_PropLog_Othms(c_minus(c_PropLog_Ohyps(v_p,A,t_a),c_PropLog_Ohyps(v_p,B,t_a),tc_set(tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_540,c_514]) ).

cnf(c_14977,plain,
    c_in(v_p,c_PropLog_Othms(c_emptyset,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_1823,c_4664]) ).

cnf(c_14976,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_513,c_14977]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : LCL431-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.44  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.44  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.44  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.44  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.44  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.45  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.45  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.45  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 22:34:35 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.45  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.45  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.11/0.45  % Process 3007952 was started by sandbox on n018,
% 0.11/0.45  % Fri Sep 25 22:34:35 2026
% 0.11/0.45  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.15/0.50  
% 0.15/0.50  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 58.72/17.37  
% 58.72/17.37  % given #500 (I,wt=4): 806 -class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__semidom(A) | class_Ring__and__Field_Ocomm__semiring__1__cancel(A) # tptp_name(clsrel_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__semidom_0) # clausal_fof(1).  [assumption].
% 58.72/17.37  
% 58.72/17.37  % given #1000 (I,wt=4): 1306 -class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__meet(A) | class_OrderedGroup_Oab__group__add(A) # tptp_name(clsrel_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__meet_1) # clausal_fof(1).  [assumption].
% 58.72/17.37  
% 58.72/17.37  % given #1500 (I,wt=22): 1993 -class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__field(A) | -c_less(c_0,B,A) | -c_less(c_0,C,A) | -c_lessequals(c_HOL_Oinverse(C,A),c_HOL_Oinverse(B,A),A) | c_lessequals(B,C,A) # tptp_name(cls_Ring__and__Field_Oinverse__le__iff__le_0) # clausal_fof(1).  [assumption].
% 58.72/17.37  
% 58.72/17.37  % given #2000 (I,wt=11): 2832 c_List_Orev(c_List_Oreplicate(A,B,C),C) = c_List_Oreplicate(A,B,C) # tptp_name(cls_List_Orev__replicate_0) # clausal_fof(1).  [assumption].
% 58.72/17.37  
% 58.72/17.37  % given #2500 (I,wt=22): 3650 -class_Ring__and__Field_Oordered__field(A) | -c_lessequals(B,C,A) | c_minus(c_SetInterval_OatLeastLessThan(B,D,A),c_SetInterval_OatLeastLessThan(B,C,A),tc_set(A)) = c_SetInterval_OatLeastLessThan(C,D,A).  [resolve(68,b,9,a)].
% 58.72/17.37  
% 58.72/17.37  % given #3000 (I,wt=10): 4367 c_Numeral_OBit(c_Numeral_Obin__succ(A),c_Numeral_Obit_OB0) = c_Numeral_Obin__succ(c_Numeral_Obin__succ(c_Numeral_OBit(A,c_Numeral_Obit_OB0))).  [back_rewrite(2288),rewrite([2290(5)])].
% 58.72/17.37  
% 58.72/17.37  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 58.72/17.37  
% 58.72/17.37  % Proof 1 at 6.99 (+ 0.68) seconds.
% 58.72/17.37  % Length of proof is 6.
% 58.72/17.37  % Level of proof is 2.
% 58.72/17.37  % Maximum clause weight is 22.000.
% 58.72/17.37  % Given clauses 3238.
% 58.72/17.37  
% 58.72/17.37  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------