↑ Up

Moca---0.1.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Moca---0.1
% Problem  : LCL437-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : moca.sh %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 12:46:08 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.02s 0.41s
% Output   : Proof 0.02s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL437-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : moca.sh %s
% 0.08/0.36  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Sep  4 16:01:08 UTC 2026
% 0.02/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.02/0.41  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.02/0.41  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.02/0.41  The input problem is unsatisfiable because
% 0.02/0.41  
% 0.02/0.41  [1] the following set of Horn clauses is unsatisfiable:
% 0.02/0.41  
% 0.02/0.41  	c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p, c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_pa, c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse, t_a), c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse, t_a), v_pa, t_a), t_a), c_PropLog_Othms(v_H, t_a), tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) ==> \bottom
% 0.02/0.41  	c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(V_p, c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse, T_a), c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse, T_a), V_p, T_a), c_PropLog_Othms(V_H, T_a), tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a))
% 0.02/0.41  	c_in(V_q, c_PropLog_Othms(V_H, T_a), tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a)) ==> c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(V_p, V_q, T_a), c_PropLog_Othms(V_H, T_a), tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a))
% 0.02/0.41  
% 0.02/0.41  This holds because
% 0.02/0.41  
% 0.02/0.41  [2] the following E entails the following G (Claessen-Smallbone's transformation (2018)):
% 0.02/0.41  
% 0.02/0.41  E:
% 0.02/0.41  	c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(V_p, c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse, T_a), c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse, T_a), V_p, T_a), c_PropLog_Othms(V_H, T_a), tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a)) = true__
% 0.02/0.41  	f1(c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p, c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_pa, c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse, t_a), c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse, t_a), v_pa, t_a), t_a), c_PropLog_Othms(v_H, t_a), tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))) = true__
% 0.02/0.41  	f1(true__) = false__
% 0.02/0.41  	f2(c_in(V_q, c_PropLog_Othms(V_H, T_a), tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a)), V_p, V_q, T_a, V_H) = true__
% 0.02/0.41  	f2(true__, V_p, V_q, T_a, V_H) = c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(V_p, V_q, T_a), c_PropLog_Othms(V_H, T_a), tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a))
% 0.02/0.41  G:
% 0.02/0.41  	true__ = false__
% 0.02/0.41  
% 0.02/0.41  This holds because
% 0.02/0.41  
% 0.02/0.41  [3] E entails the following ordered TRS and the lhs and rhs of G join by the TRS:
% 0.02/0.41  
% 0.02/0.41  
% 0.02/0.41  	c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(Y3, c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0, c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1, c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse, Y2), c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse, Y2), X1, Y2), Y2), Y2), c_PropLog_Othms(Y1, Y2), tc_PropLog_Opl(Y2)) -> true__
% 0.02/0.41  	c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(Y3, c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0, c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse, Y2), c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse, Y2), X0, Y2), Y2), c_PropLog_Othms(Y1, Y2), tc_PropLog_Opl(Y2)) -> true__
% 0.02/0.41  	c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(V_p, c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse, T_a), c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse, T_a), V_p, T_a), c_PropLog_Othms(V_H, T_a), tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a)) -> true__
% 0.02/0.41  	f1(c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p, c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_pa, c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse, t_a), c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse, t_a), v_pa, t_a), t_a), c_PropLog_Othms(v_H, t_a), tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))) -> true__
% 0.02/0.41  	f1(true__) -> false__
% 0.02/0.41  	f2(c_in(V_q, c_PropLog_Othms(V_H, T_a), tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a)), V_p, V_q, T_a, V_H) -> true__
% 0.02/0.41  	f2(true__, V_p, V_q, T_a, V_H) -> c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(V_p, V_q, T_a), c_PropLog_Othms(V_H, T_a), tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a))
% 0.02/0.41  	false__ -> true__
% 0.02/0.41  with the LPO induced by
% 0.02/0.41  	f2 > tc_PropLog_Opl > v_H > c_PropLog_Othms > t_a > c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse > v_pa > v_p > c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 > c_in > f1 > false__ > true__
% 0.02/0.41  
% 0.02/0.41  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.02/0.41  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------