%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : LCL438-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:12:45 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.47s 0.71s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.47s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 11 unt; 0 nHn; 14 RR)
% Number of literals : 24 ( 0 equ; 11 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 24 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_PropLog_Othms_OMP_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,X4,X3),c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3))
| ~ c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3))
| c_in(X4,c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms_OMP_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_pa,v_q,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_pa,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(cls_PropLog_Othms_OS_0,axiom,
c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X2,X3,X4),X4),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,X2,X4),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,X3,X4),X4),X4),c_PropLog_Othms(X5,X4),tc_PropLog_Opl(X4)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms_OS_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,X4,X3),c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3))
| ~ c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3))
| c_in(X4,c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_PropLog_Othms_OMP_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,X4,X3),c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3))
| ~ c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3))
| c_in(X4,c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)) ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_pa,v_q,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_pa,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
cls_conjecture_3 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_pa,v_q,t_a),t_a),X1,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))
| c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X2,X3,X4),X4),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,X2,X4),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,X3,X4),X4),X4),c_PropLog_Othms(X5,X4),tc_PropLog_Opl(X4)),
cls_PropLog_Othms_OS_0 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_pa,t_a),X1,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))
| c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_pa,t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_q,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : LCL438-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 00:35:21 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.45 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.47/0.71 % Version: 3.5.1
% 1.47/0.71 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.47/0.71 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.47/0.71 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.47/0.71 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.47/0.71 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.47/0.71 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.47/0.71 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 983989 completed with status 0
% 1.47/0.71 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 1.47/0.71 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.47/0.71 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.47/0.71 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.47/0.71 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.47/0.71 % No SInE strategy applied
% 1.47/0.71 % Search class: FGHSM-SSLM33-MFFFFFNN
% 1.47/0.71 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.47/0.71 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 1.47/0.71 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 1.47/0.71 % Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S2k with 136s (1) cores
% 1.47/0.71 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 1.47/0.71 % Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S2k with 136s (1) cores
% 1.47/0.71 % G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S2k with pid 984000 completed with status 0
% 1.47/0.71 % Result found by G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S2k
% 1.47/0.71 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.47/0.71 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.47/0.71 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.47/0.71 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.47/0.71 % No SInE strategy applied
% 1.47/0.71 % Search class: FGHSM-SSLM33-MFFFFFNN
% 1.47/0.71 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.47/0.71 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 1.47/0.71 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 1.47/0.71 % Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S2k with 136s (1) cores
% 1.47/0.71 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 1.47/0.71 % Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S2k with 136s (1) cores
% 1.47/0.71 % Preprocessing time : 0.012 s
% 1.47/0.71
% 1.47/0.71 % Proof found!
% 1.47/0.71 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.47/0.71 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.47/0.71 % Parsed axioms : 1378
% 1.47/0.71 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 1.47/0.71 % Initial clauses : 1378
% 1.47/0.71 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 1.47/0.71 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1377
% 1.47/0.71 % Processed clauses : 1914
% 1.47/0.71 % ...of these trivial : 13
% 1.47/0.71 % ...subsumed : 274
% 1.47/0.71 % ...remaining for further processing : 1627
% 1.47/0.71 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 4
% 1.47/0.71 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.47/0.71 % Backward-subsumed : 2
% 1.47/0.71 % Backward-rewritten : 26
% 1.47/0.71 % Generated clauses : 3755
% 1.47/0.71 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2671
% 1.47/0.71 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 1.47/0.71 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 1.47/0.71 % Paramodulations : 3717
% 1.47/0.71 % Factorizations : 0
% 1.47/0.71 % NegExts : 0
% 1.47/0.71 % Equation resolutions : 38
% 1.47/0.71 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 1.47/0.71 % Total rewrite steps : 1231
% 1.47/0.71 % ...of those cached : 980
% 1.47/0.71 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 1.47/0.71 % Propositional check models : 0
% 1.47/0.71 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.47/0.71 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 1.47/0.71 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.47/0.71 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 1.47/0.71 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 1.47/0.71 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 1.47/0.71 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 1.47/0.71 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 1.47/0.71 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 1.47/0.71 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 1.47/0.71 % Current number of processed clauses : 1599
% 1.47/0.71 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 243
% 1.47/0.71 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 1.47/0.71 % Negative unit clauses : 120
% 1.47/0.71 % Non-unit-clauses : 1235
% 1.47/0.71 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2086
% 1.47/0.71 % ...number of literals in the above : 3443
% 1.47/0.71 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.47/0.71 % Current number of archived clauses : 28
% 1.47/0.71 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 458270
% 1.47/0.71 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 435350
% 1.47/0.71 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 233
% 1.47/0.71 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9320
% 1.47/0.71 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.47/0.71 % BW rewrite match attempts : 206
% 1.47/0.71 % BW rewrite match successes : 32
% 1.47/0.71 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.47/0.71 % Condensation successes : 0
% 1.47/0.71 % Termbank termtop insertions : 92317
% 1.47/0.71 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1617
% 1.47/0.71
% 1.47/0.71 % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.47/0.71 % User time : 0.192 s
% 1.47/0.71 % System time : 0.011 s
% 1.47/0.71 % Total time : 0.203 s
% 1.47/0.71 % Maximum resident set size: 5640 pages
% 1.47/0.71
% 1.47/0.71 % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.47/0.71 % User time : 0.882 s
% 1.47/0.71 % System time : 0.051 s
% 1.47/0.71 % Total time : 0.934 s
% 1.47/0.71 % Maximum resident set size: 5632 pages
% 1.47/0.71 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------