↑ Up

SATCoP---0.1.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem  : LCL438-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : satcop --statistics %s

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 01:03:51 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.39s
% Output   : Proof 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
    c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_pa,v_q,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1)]) ).

cnf(g1,plain,
    c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_pa,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3)]) ).

cnf(g2,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4)]) ).

cnf(g3,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_pa,v_q,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))
    | ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_pa,v_q,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_pa,t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_q,t_a),t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))
    | c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_pa,t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_q,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms_OMP_0)]) ).

cnf(g4,plain,
    c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_pa,v_q,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_pa,t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_q,t_a),t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms_OS_0)]) ).

cnf(g5,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_pa,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))
    | ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_pa,t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_q,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))
    | c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms_OMP_0)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL438-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.12/0.38  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.38  % DateTime : Sat Sep  5 00:31:20 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.39  % symbols: 11
% 0.12/0.39  % clauses: 5
% 0.12/0.39  % start clauses: 3
% 0.12/0.39  % iterative deepening steps: 24
% 0.12/0.39  % maximum path limit: 1
% 0.12/0.39  % literal attempts: 171
% 0.12/0.39  % depth failures: 91
% 0.12/0.39  % regularity failures: 0
% 0.12/0.39  % tautology failures: 0
% 0.12/0.39  % reductions: 2
% 0.12/0.39  % extensions: 114
% 0.12/0.39  % SAT variables: 109
% 0.12/0.39  % SAT clauses: 101
% 0.12/0.39  % WalkSAT solutions: 93
% 0.12/0.39  % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.12/0.39  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.39  % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------