↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : LCL438-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:06:38 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.56s 1.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   30 (  24 unt;   6 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   95 (   6 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   23 (  13   ~;  10   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   7 usr;   7 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (   0 sgn  28   !;   0   ?;  19   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_pa,v_q,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_pa,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

fof(f3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(X3,c_PropLog_Othms(X1,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2))
      | ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,X3,X2),c_PropLog_Othms(X1,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2))
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_PropLog_Othms(X1,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms_OMP_0) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4] : c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,X2,X3),X3),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,X1,X3),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,X2,X3),X3),X3),c_PropLog_Othms(X4,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms_OS_0) ).

tcf(c_54,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_pa,v_q,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_55,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_pa,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_56,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tcf(c_57,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(X3,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2))
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_PropLog_Othms(X3,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2))
      | ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,X1,X2),c_PropLog_Othms(X3,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tcf(c_58,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i] : c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,X2,X3),X3),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,X1,X3),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,X2,X3),X3),X3),c_PropLog_Othms(X4,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_74,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_q,t_a),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_75,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_76,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_77,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_pa,t_a),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_78,definition,
    iPr_def_14 = c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_pa,v_q,t_a),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).

tcf(c_79,definition,
    iPr_def_15 = c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,iPr_def_14,t_a),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_15])],[]) ).

tcf(c_80,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_56,c_76,c_75,c_74]) ).

tcf(c_81,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_77]) ).

tcf(c_82,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(iPr_def_15,iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_78,c_79]) ).

tcf(c_231,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,v_q,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,X0,t_a),iPr_def_10,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(X1,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_74,c_58]) ).

tcf(c_236,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,v_q,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,X0,t_a),iPr_def_10,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(X1,t_a),iPr_def_12),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_231,c_76]) ).

tcf(c_270,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))
      | ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,X1,t_a),iPr_def_11,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_75,c_57]) ).

tcf(c_288,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_in(X1,iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12)
      | ~ c_in(X0,iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12)
      | ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,X1,t_a),iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_270,c_75,c_76]) ).

tcf(c_494,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_pa,v_q,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_10,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(X0,t_a),iPr_def_12),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_77,c_236]) ).

tcf(c_498,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(iPr_def_15,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_10,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(X0,t_a),iPr_def_12),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_494,c_78,c_79]) ).

tcf(c_505,plain,
    c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(iPr_def_15,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_10,t_a),t_a),iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_75,c_498]) ).

tcf(c_506,plain,
    ( c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_10,t_a),iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12)
    | ~ c_in(iPr_def_15,iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_505,c_288]) ).

tcf(c_507,plain,
    c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_10,t_a),iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_506,c_82]) ).

tcf(c_508,plain,
    ( c_in(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12)
    | ~ c_in(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_507,c_288]) ).

tcf(c_509,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_508,c_80,c_81]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : LCL438-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 23:22:54 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.38  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.43  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.10/0.44  % Proving...
% 1.56/1.28  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.56/1.28  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.56/1.28  
% 1.56/1.28  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.56/1.28  
% 1.56/1.28  % ------  iProver source info
% 1.56/1.28  
% 1.56/1.28  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.56/1.28  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.56/1.28  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.56/1.28  
% 1.56/1.28  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 1.56/1.28  
% 1.56/1.28  
% 1.56/1.28  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 1.56/1.28  
% 1.56/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 1.56/1.28  
% 1.56/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 1.56/1.28  
% 1.56/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 1.56/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 1.56/1.28  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 1.56/1.28  
% 1.56/1.28  % 
% 1.56/1.28  % clauses                               11
% 1.56/1.28  % conjectures                           3
% 1.56/1.28  % EPR                                   3
% 1.56/1.28  % Horn                                  11
% 1.56/1.28  % unary                                 10
% 1.56/1.28  % binary                                0
% 1.56/1.28  % lits                                  13
% 1.56/1.28  % lits eq                               6
% 1.56/1.28  % fd_pure                               0
% 1.56/1.28  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 1.56/1.28  % fd_cond                               0
% 1.56/1.28  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 1.56/1.28  % AC symbols                            0
% 1.56/1.28  
% 1.56/1.28  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 1.56/1.28  
% 1.56/1.28  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.56/1.28  
% 1.56/1.28  
% 1.56/1.28  % ------ 
% 1.56/1.28  % Current options:
% 1.56/1.28  % ------ 
% 1.56/1.28  
% 1.56/1.28  
% 1.56/1.28  % 
% 1.56/1.28  
% 1.56/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 1.56/1.28  % 
% 1.56/1.28  
% 1.56/1.28  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.56/1.28  
% 1.56/1.28  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.56/1.28  
% 1.56/1.28  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------