%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : LCL440-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:12:46 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.09s 0.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.09s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 6 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR)
% Number of literals : 6 ( 0 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(c_emptyset,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_PropLog_Othms__I_0,axiom,
c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,X1,X2),c_PropLog_Othms(X3,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms__I_0) ).
cnf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(c_emptyset,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(c_emptyset,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
c_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,X1,X2),c_PropLog_Othms(X3,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2)),
cls_PropLog_Othms__I_0 ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : LCL440-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.37 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 00:32:27 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.46 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.09/0.46 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.09/0.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.46 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.09/0.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.46 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.46 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.46 % new_bool_3 with pid 459548 completed with status 0
% 0.09/0.46 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.09/0.46 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.09/0.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.46 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.09/0.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.46 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.09/0.46 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.09/0.46 % Search class: FGHSM-FFMS32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.09/0.46 % Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.09/0.46 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.46 % SubtermCWHack with pid 459551 completed with status 0
% 0.09/0.46 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.09/0.46 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.09/0.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.46 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.09/0.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.46 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.09/0.46 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.09/0.46 % Search class: FGHSM-FFMS32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.09/0.46 % Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.09/0.46 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.46 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.09/0.46
% 0.09/0.46 % Proof found!
% 0.09/0.46 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.09/0.46 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.09/0.46 % Parsed axioms : 1374
% 0.09/0.46 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1296
% 0.09/0.46 % Initial clauses : 78
% 0.09/0.46 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.09/0.46 % Initial clauses in saturation : 78
% 0.09/0.46 % Processed clauses : 51
% 0.09/0.46 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.09/0.46 % ...subsumed : 3
% 0.09/0.46 % ...remaining for further processing : 47
% 0.09/0.46 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.09/0.46 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.09/0.46 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.09/0.46 % Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.09/0.46 % Generated clauses : 1
% 0.09/0.46 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.09/0.46 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.09/0.46 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.09/0.46 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.09/0.46 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.09/0.46 % NegExts : 0
% 0.09/0.46 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.09/0.46 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.09/0.46 % Total rewrite steps : 3
% 0.09/0.46 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.09/0.46 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.09/0.46 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.09/0.46 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.09/0.46 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.09/0.46 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.09/0.46 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.09/0.46 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.46 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.46 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.46 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.46 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.46 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.46 % Current number of processed clauses : 44
% 0.09/0.46 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 10
% 0.09/0.46 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.09/0.46 % Negative unit clauses : 7
% 0.09/0.46 % Non-unit-clauses : 27
% 0.09/0.46 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 27
% 0.09/0.46 % ...number of literals in the above : 61
% 0.09/0.46 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.09/0.46 % Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.09/0.46 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 208
% 0.09/0.46 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 208
% 0.09/0.46 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.09/0.46 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.09/0.46 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.09/0.46 % BW rewrite match attempts : 4
% 0.09/0.46 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.09/0.46 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.09/0.46 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.09/0.46 % Termbank termtop insertions : 9040
% 0.09/0.46 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2618
% 0.09/0.46
% 0.09/0.46 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.09/0.46 % User time : 0.008 s
% 0.09/0.46 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.09/0.46 % Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.09/0.46 % Maximum resident set size: 4564 pages
% 0.09/0.46
% 0.09/0.46 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.09/0.46 % User time : 0.029 s
% 0.09/0.46 % System time : 0.007 s
% 0.09/0.46 % Total time : 0.036 s
% 0.09/0.46 % Maximum resident set size: 5632 pages
% 0.09/0.46 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------