↑ Up

Moca---0.1.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Moca---0.1
% Problem  : LCL441-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : moca.sh %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep  7 12:46:08 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.42s
% Output   : Proof 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL441-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : moca.sh %s
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Sep  5 08:06:27 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.42  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.13/0.42  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.13/0.42  The input problem is unsatisfiable because
% 0.13/0.42  
% 0.13/0.42  [1] the following set of Horn clauses is unsatisfiable:
% 0.13/0.42  
% 0.13/0.42  	c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Ovar(v_a, t_a), c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse, t_a), c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Ovar(v_a, t_a), c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse, t_a), c_emptyset, tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)), t_a), tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) & c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Ovar(v_a, t_a), c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(c_PropLog_Opl_Ovar(v_a, t_a), c_emptyset, tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)), t_a), tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) ==> \bottom
% 0.13/0.42  	c_in(V_p, V_H, tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a)) ==> c_in(V_p, c_PropLog_Othms(V_H, T_a), tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a))
% 0.13/0.42  	c_in(V_x, c_insert(V_x, V_B, T_a), T_a)
% 0.13/0.42  
% 0.13/0.42  This holds because
% 0.13/0.42  
% 0.13/0.42  [2] the following E entails the following G (Claessen-Smallbone's transformation (2018)):
% 0.13/0.42  
% 0.13/0.42  E:
% 0.13/0.42  	c_in(V_x, c_insert(V_x, V_B, T_a), T_a) = true__
% 0.13/0.42  	f1(true__) = false__
% 0.13/0.42  	f2(c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Ovar(v_a, t_a), c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(c_PropLog_Opl_Ovar(v_a, t_a), c_emptyset, tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)), t_a), tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))) = true__
% 0.13/0.42  	f2(true__) = f1(c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Ovar(v_a, t_a), c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse, t_a), c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Ovar(v_a, t_a), c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse, t_a), c_emptyset, tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)), t_a), tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)))
% 0.13/0.42  	f3(c_in(V_p, V_H, tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a)), V_p, V_H, T_a) = true__
% 0.13/0.42  	f3(true__, V_p, V_H, T_a) = c_in(V_p, c_PropLog_Othms(V_H, T_a), tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a))
% 0.13/0.42  G:
% 0.13/0.42  	true__ = false__
% 0.13/0.42  
% 0.13/0.42  This holds because
% 0.13/0.42  
% 0.13/0.42  [3] E entails the following ordered TRS and the lhs and rhs of G join by the TRS:
% 0.13/0.42  
% 0.13/0.42  
% 0.13/0.42  	c_in(V_p, c_PropLog_Othms(V_H, T_a), tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a)) -> f3(true__, V_p, V_H, T_a)
% 0.13/0.42  	c_in(V_x, c_insert(V_x, V_B, T_a), T_a) -> true__
% 0.13/0.42  	f1(true__) -> false__
% 0.13/0.42  	f2(c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Ovar(v_a, t_a), c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(c_PropLog_Opl_Ovar(v_a, t_a), c_emptyset, tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)), t_a), tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))) -> true__
% 0.13/0.42  	f2(f3(true__, c_PropLog_Opl_Ovar(v_a, t_a), c_insert(c_PropLog_Opl_Ovar(v_a, t_a), c_emptyset, tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)), t_a)) -> true__
% 0.13/0.42  	f2(true__) -> f1(c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Ovar(v_a, t_a), c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse, t_a), c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Ovar(v_a, t_a), c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse, t_a), c_emptyset, tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)), t_a), tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)))
% 0.13/0.42  	f3(c_in(V_p, V_H, tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a)), V_p, V_H, T_a) -> true__
% 0.13/0.42  	f3(f3(true__, Y0, X1, Y2), Y0, c_PropLog_Othms(X1, Y2), Y2) -> true__
% 0.13/0.42  	f3(true__, Y0, c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(Y0, X1, tc_PropLog_Opl(Y2)), Y2), Y2) -> true__
% 0.13/0.42  	f3(true__, Y0, c_insert(Y0, X1, tc_PropLog_Opl(Y2)), Y2) -> true__
% 0.13/0.42  	true__ -> false__
% 0.13/0.42  with the LPO induced by
% 0.13/0.42  	f2 > c_emptyset > c_in > f3 > f1 > tc_PropLog_Opl > c_insert > c_PropLog_Othms > c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse > t_a > v_a > c_PropLog_Opl_Ovar > c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 > true__ > false__
% 0.13/0.42  
% 0.13/0.42  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.13/0.42  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------