↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : LCL443-10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:12:47 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.49s 0.51s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.49s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   27 (  27 unt;   0 nHn;   9 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   27 (  26 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   6 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   51 (   9 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_PropLog_Oweaken__left__insert_0,axiom,
    ifeq(c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)),true,c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(X4,X2,tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)),X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)),true) = true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Oweaken__left__insert_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_p,c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) = true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(ifeq_axiom,axiom,
    ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ifeq_axiom) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_q,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) = true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(cls_PropLog_Othms_OMP_0,axiom,
    ifeq(c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,X2,X3),c_PropLog_Othms(X4,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)),true,ifeq(c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(X4,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)),true,c_in(X2,c_PropLog_Othms(X4,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)),true),true) = true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms_OMP_0) ).

cnf(cls_PropLog_Othms_OH_0,axiom,
    ifeq(c_in(X1,X2,tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)),true,c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)),true) = true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms_OH_0) ).

cnf(cls_Set_OinsertCI_1,axiom,
    c_in(X1,c_insert(X1,X2,X3),X3) = true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OinsertCI_1) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) != true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

cnf(cls_PropLog_Odeduction_0,axiom,
    ifeq(c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(X2,X3,tc_PropLog_Opl(X4)),X4),tc_PropLog_Opl(X4)),true,c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X2,X1,X4),c_PropLog_Othms(X3,X4),tc_PropLog_Opl(X4)),true) = true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Odeduction_0) ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    ifeq(c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)),true,c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(X4,X2,tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)),X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)),true) = true,
    cls_PropLog_Oweaken__left__insert_0 ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_p,c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) = true,
    cls_conjecture_0 ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
    ifeq_axiom ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_q,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) = true,
    cls_conjecture_1 ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    ifeq(c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,X2,X3),c_PropLog_Othms(X4,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)),true,ifeq(c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(X4,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)),true,c_in(X2,c_PropLog_Othms(X4,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)),true),true) = true,
    cls_PropLog_Othms_OMP_0 ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_p,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(X1,v_H,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    ifeq(c_in(X1,X2,tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)),true,c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)),true) = true,
    cls_PropLog_Othms_OH_0 ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    c_in(X1,c_insert(X1,X2,X3),X3) = true,
    cls_Set_OinsertCI_1 ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_q,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(X1,v_H,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_12]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ifeq(c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,X1,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(X2,v_H,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),true,c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(X2,v_H,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),true) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(X1,X2,tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)),X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ifeq(c_in(v_q,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(X1,v_H,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),true,c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(X1,v_H,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),true) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_17]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,X1,t_a),v_H,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) != true,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,axiom,
    ifeq(c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(X2,X3,tc_PropLog_Opl(X4)),X4),tc_PropLog_Opl(X4)),true,c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X2,X1,X4),c_PropLog_Othms(X3,X4),tc_PropLog_Opl(X4)),true) = true,
    cls_PropLog_Odeduction_0 ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_q,t_a),v_H,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) != true,
    c_0_22 ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_11]),c_0_25]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL443-10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 00:32:40 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.49/0.51  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.49/0.51  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.49/0.51  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.49/0.51  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.49/0.51  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.49/0.51  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.49/0.51  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.49/0.51  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 579251 completed with status 0
% 0.49/0.51  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.49/0.51  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.49/0.51  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.49/0.51  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.49/0.51  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.49/0.51  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.49/0.51  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.49/0.51  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.49/0.51  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.49/0.51  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.49/0.51  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.49/0.51  % Starting G-E--_208_B02_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.49/0.51  % Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S5PRR_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.49/0.51  % SubtermCWHack with pid 579258 completed with status 0
% 0.49/0.51  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.49/0.51  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.49/0.51  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.49/0.51  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.49/0.51  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.49/0.51  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.49/0.51  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.49/0.51  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.49/0.51  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.49/0.51  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.49/0.51  
% 0.49/0.51  % Proof found!
% 0.49/0.51  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.49/0.51  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.49/0.51  % Parsed axioms                        : 9
% 0.49/0.51  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.49/0.51  % Initial clauses                      : 9
% 0.49/0.51  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.49/0.51  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 9
% 0.49/0.51  % Processed clauses                    : 331
% 0.49/0.51  % ...of these trivial                  : 21
% 0.49/0.51  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.49/0.51  % ...remaining for further processing  : 310
% 0.49/0.51  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.49/0.51  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.49/0.51  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.49/0.51  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.49/0.51  % Generated clauses                    : 5220
% 0.49/0.51  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1269
% 0.49/0.51  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.49/0.51  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.49/0.51  % Paramodulations                      : 5220
% 0.49/0.51  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.49/0.51  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.49/0.51  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.49/0.51  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.49/0.51  % Total rewrite steps                  : 6798
% 0.49/0.51  % ...of those cached                   : 3552
% 0.49/0.51  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.49/0.51  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.49/0.51  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.49/0.51  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.49/0.51  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.49/0.51  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.49/0.51  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.49/0.51  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.49/0.51  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.49/0.51  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.49/0.51  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.49/0.51  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.49/0.51  % Current number of processed clauses  : 310
% 0.49/0.51  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 309
% 0.49/0.51  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.49/0.51  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.49/0.51  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.49/0.51  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 942
% 0.49/0.51  % ...number of literals in the above   : 942
% 0.49/0.51  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.49/0.51  % Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.49/0.51  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.49/0.51  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.49/0.51  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.49/0.51  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.49/0.51  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.49/0.51  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 3735
% 0.49/0.51  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.49/0.51  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.49/0.51  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.49/0.51  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 109356
% 0.49/0.51  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 2
% 0.49/0.51  
% 0.49/0.51  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.49/0.51  % User time                : 0.058 s
% 0.49/0.51  % System time              : 0.009 s
% 0.49/0.51  % Total time               : 0.066 s
% 0.49/0.51  % Maximum resident set size: 3588 pages
% 0.49/0.51  
% 0.49/0.51  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.49/0.51  % User time                : 0.249 s
% 0.49/0.51  % System time              : 0.044 s
% 0.49/0.51  % Total time               : 0.293 s
% 0.49/0.51  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.49/0.51  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------