%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem : LCL445-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 11:58:42 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.48s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 18 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 11 ( 6 ~; 5 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 16 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_q,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(v_p,v_H,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_q,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),v_H,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
fof(f3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_q,c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( ~ c_in(X0,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(X1,X2,tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)),X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3))
| c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,X0,X3),c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Odeduction_0) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,X3,X2),c_PropLog_Othms(X1,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2))
| ~ c_in(X0,c_PropLog_Othms(X1,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2))
| c_in(X3,c_PropLog_Othms(X1,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms_OMP_0) ).
fof(f6,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] : c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,X1,X2),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,X2),X1,X2),X1,X2),X2),c_PropLog_Othms(X3,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms__excluded__middle_0) ).
fof(f7,plain,
c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
inference(resolution,[],[f4,f1]) ).
fof(f8,plain,
c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
inference(resolution,[],[f4,f2]) ).
fof(f12,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,X1,X2),c_PropLog_Othms(X3,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2))
| c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,X2),X1,X2),X1,X2),c_PropLog_Othms(X3,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2)) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f5,f6]) ).
fof(f17,plain,
c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),v_q,t_a),v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
inference(resolution,[],[f12,f7]) ).
fof(f22,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))
| c_in(v_q,c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f17,f5]) ).
fof(f23,plain,
c_in(v_q,c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f22,f8]) ).
fof(f24,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f23,f3]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : LCL445-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.09 % Command : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.13/0.40 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.40 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.40 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.40 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.40 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.40 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.40 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.40 % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 15:43:45 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.41 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.41 Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.13/0.44 Running first-order model finding
% 0.13/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.48 % (2199421)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.19/0.48 % (2199431)ott+1_1_to=lpo:sil=16000:sp=reverse_arity:erd=off:random_seed=2019205695:i=131_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/131Mi)
% 0.19/0.48 % (2199431) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-2199421-2199431"...
% 0.19/0.48 % (2199431)...printing done.
% 0.19/0.48 % (2199431)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.48 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.48 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.48 % (2199431)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48 % (2199431)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.19/0.48 % (2199431)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.19/0.48 % (2199431)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.19/0.48 % (2199431)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.48 % (2199431)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.48 % (2199431)Peak memory usage: 11 MB
% 0.19/0.48 % (2199431)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.19/0.48 % (2199421)Success in time 0.035 s
% 0.19/0.48 % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------