↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : LCL445-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:06:40 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.69s 1.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.69s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (  22 unt;   7 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  144 (   7 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   51 (  27   ~;  24   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   10 (   8 usr;   8 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   47 (   0 sgn  47   !;   0   ?;  35   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_q,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(v_p,v_H,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_q,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),v_H,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

fof(f3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(v_q,c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,X0,X3),c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3))
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(X1,X2,tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)),X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Odeduction_0) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(X3,c_PropLog_Othms(X1,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2))
      | ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,X3,X2),c_PropLog_Othms(X1,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2))
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_PropLog_Othms(X1,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms_OMP_0) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] : c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,X1,X2),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,X2),X1,X2),X1,X2),X2),c_PropLog_Othms(X3,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms__excluded__middle_0) ).

tcf(c_55,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_q,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(v_p,v_H,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_56,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_q,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),v_H,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_57,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(v_q,c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tcf(c_58,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,X0,X3),c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3))
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(X1,X2,tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)),X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tcf(c_59,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(X3,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2))
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_PropLog_Othms(X3,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2))
      | ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,X1,X2),c_PropLog_Othms(X3,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_60,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] : c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,X1,X2),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,X2),X1,X2),X1,X2),X2),c_PropLog_Othms(X3,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tcf(c_81,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_82,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_83,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_84,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = c_insert(iPr_def_12,v_H,iPr_def_11),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_85,definition,
    iPr_def_14 = c_PropLog_Othms(iPr_def_13,t_a),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).

tcf(c_86,definition,
    iPr_def_15 = c_insert(v_p,v_H,iPr_def_11),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_15])],[]) ).

tcf(c_87,definition,
    iPr_def_16 = c_PropLog_Othms(iPr_def_15,t_a),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_16])],[]) ).

tcf(c_88,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(v_q,iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_57,c_82,c_81]) ).

tcf(c_89,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_q,iPr_def_14,iPr_def_11),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_56,c_83,c_84,c_85]) ).

tcf(c_90,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_q,iPr_def_16,iPr_def_11),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_86,c_87]) ).

tcf(c_261,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,X0,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(X2,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(X1,X2,iPr_def_11),t_a),iPr_def_11) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_82,c_58]) ).

tcf(c_263,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,X0,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(X2,t_a),iPr_def_11)
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(X1,X2,iPr_def_11),t_a),iPr_def_11) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_261,c_82]) ).

tcf(c_268,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,X0,t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(iPr_def_12,X0,t_a),X0,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(X1,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_83,c_60]) ).

tcf(c_275,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,X0,t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(iPr_def_12,X0,t_a),X0,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(X1,t_a),iPr_def_11),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_268,c_82]) ).

tcf(c_294,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))
      | ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,X1,t_a),iPr_def_10,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_81,c_59]) ).

tcf(c_310,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( c_in(X1,iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11)
      | ~ c_in(X0,iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11)
      | ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,X1,t_a),iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_294,c_81,c_82]) ).

tcf(c_412,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(iPr_def_12,X0,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),iPr_def_11)
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_PropLog_Othms(iPr_def_13,t_a),iPr_def_11) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_84,c_263]) ).

tcf(c_413,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,X0,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),iPr_def_11)
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_PropLog_Othms(iPr_def_15,t_a),iPr_def_11) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_86,c_263]) ).

tcf(c_414,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,X0,t_a),iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11)
      | ~ c_in(X0,iPr_def_16,iPr_def_11) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_413,c_81,c_87]) ).

tcf(c_417,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(iPr_def_12,X0,t_a),iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11)
      | ~ c_in(X0,iPr_def_14,iPr_def_11) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_412,c_81,c_85]) ).

tcf(c_456,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,X0,t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(iPr_def_12,X0,t_a),X0,t_a),t_a),iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_81,c_275]) ).

tcf(c_507,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(iPr_def_12,X0,t_a),X0,t_a),iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11)
      | ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,X0,t_a),iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_456,c_310]) ).

tcf(c_588,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11)
      | ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(iPr_def_12,X0,t_a),iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11)
      | ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,X0,t_a),iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_507,c_310]) ).

tcf(c_636,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11)
      | ~ c_in(X0,iPr_def_16,iPr_def_11)
      | ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(iPr_def_12,X0,t_a),iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_414,c_588]) ).

tcf(c_650,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_in(X0,iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11)
      | ~ c_in(X0,iPr_def_16,iPr_def_11)
      | ~ c_in(X0,iPr_def_14,iPr_def_11) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_417,c_636]) ).

tcf(c_664,plain,
    ( c_in(v_q,iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11)
    | ~ c_in(v_q,iPr_def_14,iPr_def_11) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_90,c_650]) ).

tcf(c_671,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_664,c_88,c_89]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : LCL445-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 23:25:37 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.10/0.43  % Proving...
% 1.69/1.28  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.69/1.28  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.69/1.28  
% 1.69/1.28  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.69/1.28  
% 1.69/1.28  % ------  iProver source info
% 1.69/1.28  
% 1.69/1.28  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.69/1.28  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.69/1.28  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.69/1.28  
% 1.69/1.28  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 1.69/1.28  
% 1.69/1.28  
% 1.69/1.28  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 1.69/1.28  
% 1.69/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 1.69/1.28  
% 1.69/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 1.69/1.28  
% 1.69/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 1.69/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 1.69/1.28  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 1.69/1.28  
% 1.69/1.28  % 
% 1.69/1.28  % clauses                               13
% 1.69/1.28  % conjectures                           3
% 1.69/1.28  % EPR                                   3
% 1.69/1.28  % Horn                                  13
% 1.69/1.28  % unary                                 11
% 1.69/1.28  % binary                                1
% 1.69/1.28  % lits                                  16
% 1.69/1.28  % lits eq                               7
% 1.69/1.28  % fd_pure                               0
% 1.69/1.28  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 1.69/1.28  % fd_cond                               0
% 1.69/1.28  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 1.69/1.28  % AC symbols                            0
% 1.69/1.28  
% 1.69/1.28  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 1.69/1.28  
% 1.69/1.28  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.69/1.28  
% 1.69/1.28  
% 1.69/1.28  % ------ 
% 1.69/1.28  % Current options:
% 1.69/1.28  % ------ 
% 1.69/1.28  
% 1.69/1.28  
% 1.69/1.28  % 
% 1.69/1.28  
% 1.69/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 1.69/1.28  % 
% 1.69/1.28  
% 1.69/1.28  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.69/1.28  
% 1.69/1.28  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.69/1.28  
% 1.69/1.28  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------