↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : LCL446-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:51:51 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.89s 16.80s
% Output   : Refutation 2.89s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    9 (   7 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   13 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  142 (   6   ~;   4   |;   0   &; 132   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (  12 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    8 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   26 (   0   ^;  26   !;   0   ?;  26   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(c_in_decl,type,
    c_in: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62_decl,type,
    c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62: $i > $i > $i > $i ).

thf(v_p_decl,type,
    v_p: $i ).

thf(t_a_decl,type,
    t_a: $i ).

thf(c_PropLog_Othms_decl,type,
    c_PropLog_Othms: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(v_H_decl,type,
    v_H: $i ).

thf(tc_PropLog_Opl_decl,type,
    tc_PropLog_Opl: $i > $i ).

thf(1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( t_a @ tc_PropLog_Opl @ ( t_a @ ( v_H @ c_PropLog_Othms ) @ ( t_a @ ( v_p @ ( v_p @ c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 ) ) @ c_in ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ~ ( t_a @ tc_PropLog_Opl @ ( t_a @ ( v_H @ c_PropLog_Othms ) @ ( t_a @ ( v_p @ ( v_p @ c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 ) ) @ c_in ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

thf(2,axiom,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] : ( C @ tc_PropLog_Opl @ ( C @ ( D @ c_PropLog_Othms ) @ ( C @ ( C @ ( A @ ( B @ c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 ) ) @ ( A @ c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 ) ) @ c_in ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms_OK_0) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] : ( C @ tc_PropLog_Opl @ ( C @ ( D @ c_PropLog_Othms ) @ ( C @ ( C @ ( A @ ( B @ c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 ) ) @ ( A @ c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 ) ) @ c_in ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ tc_PropLog_Opl @ ( C @ ( B @ c_PropLog_Othms ) @ ( D @ c_in ) ) )
      | ~ ( C @ tc_PropLog_Opl @ ( C @ ( B @ c_PropLog_Othms ) @ ( C @ ( D @ ( A @ c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 ) ) @ c_in ) ) )
      | ~ ( C @ tc_PropLog_Opl @ ( C @ ( B @ c_PropLog_Othms ) @ ( A @ c_in ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms_OMP_0) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ tc_PropLog_Opl @ ( C @ ( B @ c_PropLog_Othms ) @ ( D @ c_in ) ) )
      | ~ ( C @ tc_PropLog_Opl @ ( C @ ( B @ c_PropLog_Othms ) @ ( C @ ( D @ ( A @ c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 ) ) @ c_in ) ) )
      | ~ ( C @ tc_PropLog_Opl @ ( C @ ( B @ c_PropLog_Othms ) @ ( A @ c_in ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] : ( D @ tc_PropLog_Opl @ ( D @ ( E @ c_PropLog_Othms ) @ ( D @ ( D @ ( D @ ( C @ ( A @ c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 ) ) @ ( D @ ( B @ ( A @ c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 ) ) @ c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 ) ) @ ( D @ ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 ) ) @ ( A @ c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 ) ) @ c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 ) ) @ c_in ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms_OS_0) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ! [E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] : ( D @ tc_PropLog_Opl @ ( D @ ( E @ c_PropLog_Othms ) @ ( D @ ( D @ ( D @ ( C @ ( A @ c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 ) ) @ ( D @ ( B @ ( A @ c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 ) ) @ c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 ) ) @ ( D @ ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 ) ) @ ( A @ c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 ) ) @ c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 ) ) @ c_in ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(14,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[5,7,8,10]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL446-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.09/5.38   % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.09/5.38   % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/5.38   % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/5.38   % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/5.38   % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/15.67  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/15.67  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/15.67  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 22:34:25 UTC 2026
% 0.12/15.67  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/15.67  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.37/15.97  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.06/16.07  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (93ms). 
% 1.06/16.07  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.37/16.27  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.37/16.27  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.60/16.32  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 3 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 1.60/16.33  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 3 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 1.60/16.34  % [INFO] 	 Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF). 
% 1.60/16.34  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 1.60/16.34  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 2.67/16.79  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 2.67/16.80  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 2.67/16.80  % Time passed: 1036ms (effective reasoning time: 719ms)
% 2.89/16.80  % Axioms used in derivation (3): cls_PropLog_Othms_OK_0, cls_PropLog_Othms_OMP_0, cls_PropLog_Othms_OS_0
% 2.89/16.80  % No. of inferences in proof: 9
% 2.89/16.80  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1036 ms resp. 719 ms w/o parsing
% 2.89/16.83  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.89/16.83  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------