%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem : LCL446-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satcop --statistics %s
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep 7 01:03:52 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.03s 0.31s
% Output : Proof 0.03s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_p,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0)]) ).
cnf(g1,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(t_a,v_p,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))
| ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(t_a,v_p,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_p,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))
| c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_p,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms_OMP_0)]) ).
cnf(g2,plain,
c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(t_a,v_p,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms_OK_0)]) ).
cnf(g3,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(t_a,v_p,t_a),v_p,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))
| ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(t_a,v_p,t_a),v_p,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(t_a,v_p,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_p,t_a),t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))
| c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(t_a,v_p,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_p,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms_OMP_0)]) ).
cnf(g4,plain,
c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(t_a,v_p,t_a),v_p,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(t_a,v_p,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_p,t_a),t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms_OS_0)]) ).
cnf(g5,plain,
c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(t_a,v_p,t_a),v_p,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms_OK_0)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01 % Problem : LCL446-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.02 % Command : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.03/0.30 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.03/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.03/0.30 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.03/0.30 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.03/0.30 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.03/0.30 % DateTime : Sat Sep 5 14:11:27 UTC 2026
% 0.03/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.03/0.31 % symbols: 9
% 0.03/0.31 % clauses: 4
% 0.03/0.31 % start clauses: 1
% 0.03/0.31 % iterative deepening steps: 56
% 0.03/0.31 % maximum path limit: 4
% 0.03/0.31 % literal attempts: 274
% 0.03/0.31 % depth failures: 68
% 0.03/0.31 % regularity failures: 6
% 0.03/0.31 % tautology failures: 0
% 0.03/0.31 % reductions: 0
% 0.03/0.31 % extensions: 219
% 0.03/0.31 % SAT variables: 194
% 0.03/0.31 % SAT clauses: 202
% 0.03/0.31 % WalkSAT solutions: 195
% 0.03/0.31 % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.03/0.31 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.03/0.31 % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------