↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : LCL447-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:06:41 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.91s 6.29s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.91s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   11 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   16 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   13 (   8   ~;   5   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   20 (   0 sgn  20   !;   0   ?;  12   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1446,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] : c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,X0,X2),X2),c_PropLog_Othms(X3,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms_OK_0) ).

fof(f1447,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(X3,c_PropLog_Othms(X1,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2))
      | ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,X3,X2),c_PropLog_Othms(X1,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2))
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_PropLog_Othms(X1,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms_OMP_0) ).

fof(f1448,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_q,c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

fof(f1449,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

tcf(c_1420,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_q,c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1448]) ).

tcf(c_1421,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1449]) ).

tcf(c_1422,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(X3,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2))
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_PropLog_Othms(X3,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2))
      | ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,X1,X2),c_PropLog_Othms(X3,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1447]) ).

tcf(c_1423,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] : c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,X0,X2),X2),c_PropLog_Othms(X3,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1446]) ).

tcf(c_1630,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X3,X0,X2),c_PropLog_Othms(X1,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2))
      | ~ c_in(X0,c_PropLog_Othms(X1,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1423,c_1422]) ).

tcf(c_1643,plain,
    ~ c_in(v_q,c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1630,c_1421]) ).

tcf(c_1644,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1643,c_1420]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : LCL447-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.08/5.37  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.08/5.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/5.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/5.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/5.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/5.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/5.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/5.37  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 23:30:02 UTC 2026
% 0.08/5.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/5.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/5.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/5.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/5.42  
% 0.13/5.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.13/5.42  
% 0.13/5.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.13/5.43  % Proving...
% 0.91/6.29  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.91/6.29  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.91/6.29  
% 0.91/6.29  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 0.91/6.29  
% 0.91/6.29  % ------  iProver source info
% 0.91/6.29  
% 0.91/6.29  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 0.91/6.29  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 0.91/6.29  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.91/6.29  
% 0.91/6.29  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 0.91/6.29  
% 0.91/6.29  
% 0.91/6.29  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 0.91/6.29  
% 0.91/6.29  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 0.91/6.29  
% 0.91/6.29  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 0.91/6.29  
% 0.91/6.29  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 0.91/6.29  % ------ Proving...
% 0.91/6.29  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 0.91/6.29  
% 0.91/6.29  % 
% 0.91/6.29  % clauses                               7
% 0.91/6.29  % conjectures                           2
% 0.91/6.29  % EPR                                   0
% 0.91/6.29  % Horn                                  7
% 0.91/6.29  % unary                                 3
% 0.91/6.29  % binary                                3
% 0.91/6.29  % lits                                  12
% 0.91/6.29  % lits eq                               4
% 0.91/6.29  % fd_pure                               0
% 0.91/6.29  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 0.91/6.29  % fd_cond                               0
% 0.91/6.29  % fd_pseudo_cond                        2
% 0.91/6.29  % AC symbols                            0
% 0.91/6.29  
% 0.91/6.29  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 0.91/6.29  
% 0.91/6.29  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 0.91/6.29  
% 0.91/6.29  
% 0.91/6.29  % ------ 
% 0.91/6.29  % Current options:
% 0.91/6.29  % ------ 
% 0.91/6.29  
% 0.91/6.29  
% 0.91/6.29  % 
% 0.91/6.29  
% 0.91/6.29  % ------ Proving...
% 0.91/6.29  % 
% 0.91/6.29  
% 0.91/6.29  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.91/6.29  
% 0.91/6.29  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.91/6.29  
% 0.91/6.29  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------