↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : LCL451+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:58:58 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.17s 5.63s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   28 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   24 (  11   ~;   8   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   3 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (   0 sgn  15   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(implies_3,axiom,
    ( implies_3
  <=> ! [X,Y,Z] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(implies(Y,Z),implies(X,Z)))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',implies_3) ).

fof(cn1,axiom,
    ( cn1
  <=> ! [P,Q,R] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(P,Q),implies(implies(Q,R),implies(P,R)))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cn1) ).

fof(luka_cn1,conjecture,
    cn1,
    file('theBenchmark.p',luka_cn1) ).

fof(luka_cn1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ cn1,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[luka_cn1]) ).

cnf(c_46,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C))))
    | ~ implies_3 ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[implies_3]) ).

fof(nnf_19,plain,
    ( ( ? [P,Q,R] : ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(P,Q),implies(implies(Q,R),implies(P,R))))
      | cn1 )
    & ( ! [X0,X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X0,X2))))
      | ~ cn1 ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[cn1]) ).

fof(sk_cn1_sk,plain,
    ( ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(sK0,sK1),implies(implies(sK1,sK2),implies(sK0,sK2))))
      | cn1 )
    & ( ! [X0,X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X0,X2))))
      | ~ cn1 ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2]),skolemize(P,sK0),skolemize(Q,sK1),skolemize(R,sK2)],[nnf_19]) ).

fof(sk_cn1,plain,
    ( ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(sK0,sK1),implies(implies(sK1,sK2),implies(sK0,sK2))))
      | cn1 )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(VAR_0,VAR_1),implies(implies(VAR_1,VAR_2),implies(VAR_0,VAR_2))))
        | ~ cn1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_cn1_sk]) ).

cnf(c_73,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(sK0,sK1),implies(implies(sK1,sK2),implies(sK0,sK2))))
    | cn1 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_cn1]) ).

fof(hilbert_implies_3,axiom,
    implies_3,
    file('theBenchmark.p',hilbert_implies_3) ).

cnf(c_103,plain,
    implies_3,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[hilbert_implies_3]) ).

cnf(c_115,negated_conjecture,
    ~ cn1,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[luka_cn1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_123,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_103,c_46]) ).

cnf(c_132,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(sK0,sK1),implies(implies(sK1,sK2),implies(sK0,sK2)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_115,c_73]) ).

cnf(c_131,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_123,c_132]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL451+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/5.60  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.10/5.60  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/5.60  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/5.60  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/5.60  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/5.60  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/5.60  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/5.60  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 22:36:17 UTC 2026
% 0.17/5.60  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/5.60  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.17/5.60  % Process 2110008 was started by sandbox2 on n008,
% 0.17/5.60  % Fri Sep 25 22:36:17 2026
% 0.17/5.60  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.17/5.61  
% 0.17/5.61  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.17/5.63  
% 0.17/5.63  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.17/5.63  
% 0.17/5.63  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.17/5.63  % Length of proof is 9.
% 0.17/5.63  % Level of proof is 3.
% 0.17/5.63  % Maximum clause weight is 53.000.
% 0.17/5.63  % Given clauses 0.
% 0.17/5.63  
% 0.17/5.63  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------