↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : LCL452+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:06:41 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.10s 1.29s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   40 (  21 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   59 (  11 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   38 (  19   ~;  13   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   5 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   40 (   0 sgn  38   !;   2   ?;  14   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f10,axiom,
    ( or_1
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,or(X0,X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',or_1) ).

fof(f20,axiom,
    ( cn2
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(not(X0),X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',cn2) ).

fof(f27,axiom,
    ( op_or
   => ! [X0,X1] : or(X0,X1) = not(and(not(X0),not(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_or) ).

fof(f29,axiom,
    ( op_implies_and
   => ! [X0,X1] : implies(X0,X1) = not(and(X0,not(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_implies_and) ).

fof(f33,axiom,
    op_implies_and,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_op_implies_and) ).

fof(f43,axiom,
    or_1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_or_1) ).

fof(f50,axiom,
    op_or,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',luka_op_or) ).

fof(f53,conjecture,
    cn2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',luka_cn2) ).

fof(f54,negated_conjecture,
    ~ cn2,
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f53]) ).

fof(f55,plain,
    ~ cn2,
    inference(flattening,[],[f54]) ).

fof(f56,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(not(X0),X1)))
   => cn2 ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f20]) ).

fof(f62,plain,
    ( or_1
   => ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,or(X0,X1))) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f85,plain,
    ( ~ or_1
    | ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,or(X0,X1))) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f62]) ).

fof(f91,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1] : ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(not(X0),X1)))
    | cn2 ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f56]) ).

fof(f92,plain,
    ( ~ op_or
    | ! [X0,X1] : or(X0,X1) = not(and(not(X0),not(X1))) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).

fof(f93,plain,
    ( ~ op_implies_and
    | ! [X0,X1] : implies(X0,X1) = not(and(X0,not(X1))) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

fof(f95,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sK0,implies(not(sK0),sK1)))
    | cn2 ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1)],[f91]) ).

fof(f105,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ or_1
      | is_a_theorem(implies(X0,or(X0,X1))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f85]) ).

fof(f111,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sK0,implies(not(sK0),sK1)))
    | cn2 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f95]) ).

fof(f112,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ op_or
      | or(X0,X1) = not(and(not(X0),not(X1))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f92]) ).

fof(f113,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ op_implies_and
      | implies(X0,X1) = not(and(X0,not(X1))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f93]) ).

fof(f116,plain,
    op_implies_and,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f33]) ).

fof(f126,plain,
    or_1,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f43]) ).

fof(f133,plain,
    op_or,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f50]) ).

fof(f135,plain,
    ~ cn2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f55]) ).

tcf(c_58,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X0,or(X0,X1)))
      | ~ or_1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f105]) ).

tcf(c_64,plain,
    ( cn2
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sK0,implies(not(sK0),sK1))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f111]) ).

tcf(c_65,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( not(and(not(X0),not(X1))) = or(X0,X1) )
      | ~ op_or ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f112]) ).

tcf(c_66,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( not(and(X0,not(X1))) = implies(X0,X1) )
      | ~ op_implies_and ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f113]) ).

tcf(c_69,plain,
    op_implies_and,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f116]) ).

tcf(c_79,plain,
    or_1,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f126]) ).

tcf(c_86,plain,
    op_or,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f133]) ).

tcf(c_88,negated_conjecture,
    ~ cn2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f135]) ).

tcf(c_109,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,or(X0,X1))),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_58,c_79,c_58]) ).

tcf(c_119,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sK0,implies(not(sK0),sK1))),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_88,c_64]) ).

tcf(c_132,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : not(and(X0,not(X1))) = implies(X0,X1),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_66,c_69,c_66]) ).

tcf(c_143,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : not(and(not(X0),not(X1))) = or(X0,X1),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_65,c_86,c_65]) ).

tcf(c_248,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : implies(not(X0),X1) = or(X0,X1),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_143,c_132]) ).

tcf(c_250,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sK0,or(sK0,sK1))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_119,c_248]) ).

tcf(c_251,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_250,c_109]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL452+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 23:31:26 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.42  
% 0.11/0.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.11/0.42  
% 0.11/0.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.11/0.43  % Proving...
% 2.10/1.29  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.10/1.29  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.10/1.29  
% 2.10/1.29  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.10/1.29  
% 2.10/1.29  % ------  iProver source info
% 2.10/1.29  
% 2.10/1.29  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.10/1.29  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.10/1.29  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.10/1.29  
% 2.10/1.29  % ------ Parsing...
% 2.10/1.29  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 2.10/1.29  
% 2.10/1.29  % ------ Preprocessing...% 
% 2.10/1.29  
% 2.10/1.29  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.10/1.29  
% 2.10/1.29  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.10/1.29  
% 2.10/1.29  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------