↑ Up

ET---2.0.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : LCL453+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 10:11:18 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 1.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   62 (  33 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  116 (   5 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   91 (  37   ~;  35   |;  10   &)
%                                         (   7 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   11 (   9 usr;   9 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   17 (  17 usr;  14 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   85 (   5 sgn  32   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(modus_ponens,axiom,
    ( modus_ponens
  <=> ! [X1,X2] :
        ( ( is_a_theorem(X1)
          & is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) )
       => is_a_theorem(X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',modus_ponens) ).

fof(implies_2,axiom,
    ( implies_2
  <=> ! [X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,implies(X1,X2)),implies(X1,X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',implies_2) ).

fof(implies_3,axiom,
    ( implies_3
  <=> ! [X1,X2,X3] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',implies_3) ).

fof(hilbert_modus_ponens,axiom,
    modus_ponens,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_modus_ponens) ).

fof(hilbert_implies_2,axiom,
    implies_2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_implies_2) ).

fof(and_3,axiom,
    ( and_3
  <=> ! [X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,and(X1,X2)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',and_3) ).

fof(hilbert_implies_3,axiom,
    implies_3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_implies_3) ).

fof(hilbert_and_3,axiom,
    and_3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_and_3) ).

fof(op_implies_and,axiom,
    ( op_implies_and
   => ! [X1,X2] : implies(X1,X2) = not(and(X1,not(X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_implies_and) ).

fof(implies_1,axiom,
    ( implies_1
  <=> ! [X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',implies_1) ).

fof(hilbert_op_implies_and,axiom,
    op_implies_and,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_op_implies_and) ).

fof(modus_tollens,axiom,
    ( modus_tollens
  <=> ! [X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X2),not(X1)),implies(X1,X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',modus_tollens) ).

fof(hilbert_implies_1,axiom,
    implies_1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_implies_1) ).

fof(hilbert_modus_tollens,axiom,
    modus_tollens,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_modus_tollens) ).

fof(luka_cn3,conjecture,
    cn3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',luka_cn3) ).

fof(cn3,axiom,
    ( cn3
  <=> ! [X4] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X4),X4),X4)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',cn3) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ( ~ modus_ponens
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X3)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X3,X4))
        | is_a_theorem(X4) )
      & ( is_a_theorem(esk1_0)
        | modus_ponens )
      & ( is_a_theorem(implies(esk1_0,esk2_0))
        | modus_ponens )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(esk2_0)
        | modus_ponens ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[modus_ponens])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ( ~ implies_2
        | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X3,implies(X3,X4)),implies(X3,X4))) )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk9_0,implies(esk9_0,esk10_0)),implies(esk9_0,esk10_0)))
        | implies_2 ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[implies_2])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ( ~ implies_3
        | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X4,X5),implies(implies(X5,X6),implies(X4,X6)))) )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk11_0,esk12_0),implies(implies(esk12_0,esk13_0),implies(esk11_0,esk13_0))))
        | implies_3 ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[implies_3])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
    | ~ modus_ponens ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    modus_ponens,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_modus_ponens]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,implies(X1,X2)),implies(X1,X2)))
    | ~ implies_2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    implies_2,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_implies_2]) ).

fof(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ( ~ and_3
        | is_a_theorem(implies(X3,implies(X4,and(X3,X4)))) )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(esk18_0,implies(esk19_0,and(esk18_0,esk19_0))))
        | and_3 ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[and_3])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3))))
    | ~ implies_3 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    implies_3,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_implies_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20])]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,implies(X1,X2)),implies(X1,X2))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22])]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,and(X1,X2))))
    | ~ and_3 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    and_3,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_and_3]) ).

fof(c_0_30,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ op_implies_and
      | implies(X3,X4) = not(and(X3,not(X4))) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_implies_and])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3)))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25])]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X1,X2))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,and(X1,X2)))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29])]) ).

fof(c_0_34,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ( ~ implies_1
        | is_a_theorem(implies(X3,implies(X4,X3))) )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(esk7_0,implies(esk8_0,esk7_0)))
        | implies_1 ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[implies_1])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( implies(X1,X2) = not(and(X1,not(X2)))
    | ~ op_implies_and ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    op_implies_and,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_op_implies_and]) ).

fof(c_0_37,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ( ~ modus_tollens
        | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X4),not(X3)),implies(X3,X4))) )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(esk6_0),not(esk5_0)),implies(esk5_0,esk6_0)))
        | modus_tollens ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[modus_tollens])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X3,X2)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X3,X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,and(X1,X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X1)))
    | ~ implies_1 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    implies_1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_implies_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    not(and(X1,not(X2))) = implies(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36])]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),not(X2)),implies(X2,X1)))
    | ~ modus_tollens ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    modus_tollens,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_modus_tollens]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(and(X1,X1),X2),implies(X1,X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X1))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41])]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    not(and(X1,implies(X2,X3))) = implies(X1,and(X2,not(X3))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_42]) ).

fof(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    ~ cn3,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[luka_cn3]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),not(X2)),implies(X2,X1))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44])]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(and(X1,X1),X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(and(X1,not(X2)),not(and(X3,implies(X1,X2))))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47]) ).

fof(c_0_52,plain,
    ! [X5] :
      ( ( ~ cn3
        | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X5),X5),X5)) )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(esk44_0),esk44_0),esk44_0))
        | cn3 ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[cn3])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_53,negated_conjecture,
    ~ cn3,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_48]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(X2),not(X1))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_49]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(not(X1),not(and(X2,implies(not(X1),X1))))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_51]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,plain,
    ( cn3
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(esk44_0),esk44_0),esk44_0)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_52]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
    ~ cn3,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_53]) ).

cnf(c_0_58,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(and(X1,implies(not(X2),X2)),X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_55]) ).

cnf(c_0_59,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(esk44_0),esk44_0),esk44_0)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_57]) ).

cnf(c_0_60,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),X1),X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_58]) ).

cnf(c_0_61,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_59,c_0_60])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : LCL453+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jul  4 13:29:22 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/1.41  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.22/1.41  # Preprocessing time       : 0.019 s
% 0.22/1.41  
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof found!
% 0.22/1.41  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/1.41  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object total steps             : 62
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object clause steps            : 36
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object formula steps           : 26
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object conjectures             : 4
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 1
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 16
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 16
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object generating inferences   : 11
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 17
% 0.22/1.41  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.22/1.41  # Parsed axioms                        : 53
% 0.22/1.41  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Initial clauses                      : 82
% 0.22/1.41  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 82
% 0.22/1.41  # Processed clauses                    : 952
% 0.22/1.41  # ...of these trivial                  : 90
% 0.22/1.41  # ...subsumed                          : 321
% 0.22/1.41  # ...remaining for further processing  : 541
% 0.22/1.41  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Backward-subsumed                    : 9
% 0.22/1.41  # Backward-rewritten                   : 26
% 0.22/1.41  # Generated clauses                    : 36836
% 0.22/1.41  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 34413
% 0.22/1.41  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 130
% 0.22/1.41  # Paramodulations                      : 36824
% 0.22/1.41  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.22/1.42  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.22/1.42  # Current number of processed clauses  : 502
% 0.22/1.42  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 161
% 0.22/1.42  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 7
% 0.22/1.42  #    Negative unit clauses             : 32
% 0.22/1.42  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 302
% 0.22/1.42  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 32910
% 0.22/1.42  # ...number of literals in the above   : 73671
% 0.22/1.42  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.22/1.42  # Current number of archived clauses   : 35
% 0.22/1.42  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 10087
% 0.22/1.42  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9379
% 0.22/1.42  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 388
% 0.22/1.42  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2240
% 0.22/1.42  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.22/1.42  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2839
% 0.22/1.42  # BW rewrite match successes           : 26
% 0.22/1.42  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.22/1.42  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.22/1.42  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 825927
% 0.22/1.42  
% 0.22/1.42  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/1.42  # User time                : 0.447 s
% 0.22/1.42  # System time              : 0.019 s
% 0.22/1.42  # Total time               : 0.466 s
% 0.22/1.42  # Maximum resident set size: 39228 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------